Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
pgsql-hackers 1999-08 Chronological Index (1/4)
Last updated: Wed Jan 18 03:38:04 2012
697 messages
31 August 1999
OID 718 and Circle G. Anthony Reina (22:18)
Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: Unable to locate type oid 718 in catalog G. Anthony Reina (22:06)
Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2 Tom Lane (21:53)
CVS Broken? Keith Parks (21:51)
Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: Unable to locate type oid 718 in catalog Tom Lane (21:48)
Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2 Massimo Dal Zotto (20:49)
Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2 Massimo Dal Zotto (20:49)
Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: Unable to locate type oid 718 in catalog G. Anthony Reina (20:09)
Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: Unable to locate type oid 718 in catalog Tom Lane (19:52)
Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2 The Hermit Hacker (19:51)
Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: Unable to locate type oid 718 in catalog G. Anthony Reina (19:03)
Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: Unable to locate type oid 718 in catalog Tom Lane (18:33)
[no subject] fjcuberos (18:27)
Re: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Leon (18:12)
Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2 Tom Lane (17:52)
ERROR: Unable to locate type oid 718 in catalog G. Anthony Reina (16:50)
Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2 Massimo Dal Zotto (16:40)
bug in array contrib Massimo Dal Zotto (16:40)
Re: [HACKERS] File descriptor leakage? Vadim Mikheev (16:22)
Re: [HACKERS] File descriptor leakage? Tom Lane (15:50)
Re: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Thomas Lockhart (15:24)
Re: [HACKERS] File descriptor leakage? The Hermit Hacker (15:23)
Re: [HACKERS] File descriptor leakage? Cyrus Rahman (15:12)
RE: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Ansley, Michael (14:21)
Re: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Tom Lane (14:19)
RE: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Ansley, Michael (14:08)
Re: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Tom Lane (14:01)
Re: [HACKERS] File descriptor leakage? Tom Lane (13:52)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/include/parser (parse_node.h parse_oper.h) Tom Lane (13:48)
Re: [HACKERS] optimizer pruning problem Tom Lane (13:37)
optimizer pruning problem Roberto Cornacchia (12:13)
Re: [HACKERS] Implications of multi-byte support in a distribution Oleg Bartunov (12:10)
Re: [HACKERS] Implications of multi-byte support in a distribution Tatsuo Ishii (09:30)
Re: [HACKERS] Implications of multi-byte support in a distribution Oleg Broytmann (08:36)
Re: IPC on win32 - additions for 6.5.2 and current trees yutaka tanida (08:30)
Re: [HACKERS] Implications of multi-byte support in a distribution Thomas Lockhart (07:04)
Re: [HACKERS] ANSI SQL compliance Thomas Lockhart (06:47)
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/include/parser (parse_node.h parse_oper.h) Thomas Lockhart (05:11)
RE: [HACKERS] File descriptor leakage? Hiroshi Inoue (04:46)
Re: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Thomas Lockhart (04:11)
Re: libpq drops error messages received just before backend crash Tom Lane (01:54)
Re: [HACKERS] File descriptor leakage? Tom Lane (01:51)
[no subject] Hub.Org News Admin (00:04)
File descriptor leakage? Cyrus Rahman (00:03)
30 August 1999
File descriptor leakage? Cyrus Rahman (22:03)
[no subject] Hub.Org News Admin (21:20)
Implications of multi-byte support in a distribution Oliver Elphick (21:20)
[no subject] Hub.Org News Admin (20:54)
Re: [HACKERS] Quoting in stored procedures pgsql-hackers (20:54)
[no subject] Hub.Org News Admin (17:56)
bouncefilter added to majordomo lists ... The Hermit Hacker (17:55)
[no subject] Hub.Org News Admin (17:54)
Re: HELP Re: pg_group, etc.. Ricardo Coelho (17:54)
Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2 The Hermit Hacker (17:05)
Re: [HACKERS] An optimisation question Constantin Teodorescu (15:34)
[no subject] Hub.Org News Admin (15:07)
Re: [HACKERS] Why not sub-selects in targetlists? Tom Lane (15:05)
Re: [HACKERS] An optimisation question Tom Lane (14:34)
Re: [HACKERS] getting at the actual int4 value of an abstime José Soares (13:23)
IPC on win32 - additions for 6.5.2 and current trees Horak Daniel (12:15)
AW: [HACKERS] [Fwd: bug ? get_groname: group 0 not found] Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5 (09:59)
An optimisation question Constantin Teodorescu (06:43)
Re: [HACKERS] ANSI SQL compliance Jernej Zajc (06:27)
[no subject] Hub.Org News Admin (02:11)
Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2 Tatsuo Ishii (02:03)
Re: [HACKERS] Why not sub-selects in targetlists? Vadim Mikheev (01:40)
29 August 1999
[no subject] Hub.Org News Admin (20:09)
Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2 The Hermit Hacker (19:40)
Why not sub-selects in targetlists? Tom Lane (17:48)
Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2 Tom Lane (16:50)
Re: [HACKERS] ANSI SQL compliance Tom Lane (16:50)
PostgreSQL 6.5.2 Tatsuo Ishii (12:51)
ANSI SQL compliance Jernej Zajc (12:46)
[no subject] Hub.Org News Admin (10:40)
Cluster on (index-name) loose NOT NULL properties Constantin Teodorescu (07:29)
Re: [HACKERS] entries in pg_shadow Tom Lane (01:05)
Re: [HACKERS] Quoting in stored procedures Tom Lane (00:54)
Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: bug ? get_groname: group 0 not found] Tom Lane (00:51)
entries in pg_shadow Michael Richards (00:40)
28 August 1999
Quoting in stored procedures Jochen Topf (21:20)
[Fwd: bug ? get_groname: group 0 not found] Spirou (20:24)
27 August 1999
Re: [HACKERS] getting at the actual int4 value of an abstime Tom Lane (19:07)
Re: [HACKERS] Performance of MIN() and MAX() Tom Lane (15:31)
Performance of MIN() and MAX() Gene Sokolov (14:46)
Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: pull_var_clause: Cannot handle node type 108 Tom Lane (13:58)
Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: pull_var_clause: Cannot handle node type 108 José Soares (12:38)
26 August 1999
Files ... Dmitry Samersoff (16:43)
25 August 1999
stuck spinlock Lori Allen (17:40)
Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Leon (16:41)
Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Tom Lane (15:04)
Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size The Hermit Hacker (14:56)
AW: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5 (14:33)
Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Tom Lane (14:33)
RE: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Ansley, Michael (14:21)
RE: [HACKERS] vacuum process size The Hermit Hacker (14:19)
Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size The Hermit Hacker (14:06)
RE: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Ansley, Michael (14:00)
Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Tatsuo Ishii (13:57)
Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Tom Lane (13:46)
PATCH for Statement Triggers Support F.J. Cuberos (11:23)
RE: [HACKERS] Lex and things... Ansley, Michael (07:59)
RE: [HACKERS] Lex and things... Ansley, Michael (07:49)
pg_log 100MB per day !!! on 5MB of data Richard Bouska (06:36)
RE: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Hiroshi Inoue (01:09)
Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Bruce Momjian (00:25)
RE: [HACKERS] Sorting costs (was Caution: tonight's commits force initdb) Hiroshi Inoue (00:15)
Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Tatsuo Ishii (00:08)
24 August 1999
Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Tom Lane (20:52)
Re: memory requirements question Tom Lane (20:37)
Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Tom Lane (20:22)
[no subject] Hub.Org News Admin (19:15)
Re: [HACKERS] Sorting costs (was Caution: tonight's commits force initdb) Hannu Krosing (18:59)
Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Brian E Gallew (17:01)
Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Tom Lane (16:21)
Re: AW: [HACKERS] Caution: tonight's commits force initdb Theo Kramer (15:33)
Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Tom Lane (15:08)
Sorting costs (was Caution: tonight's commits force initdb) Tom Lane (14:59)
Re: [HACKERS] Lex and things... Leon (14:13)
Re: [HACKERS] Lex and things... Leon (14:12)
Re: [HACKERS] Lex and things... Adriaan Joubert (13:35)
RE: [HACKERS] Lex and things... Ansley, Michael (13:17)
Re: [HACKERS] Lex and things... Leon (12:28)
Re: [HACKERS] Lex and things... Leon (12:28)
RE: [HACKERS] Lex and things... Ansley, Michael (11:18)
RE: [HACKERS] Lex and things... Ansley, Michael (11:00)
Re: [HACKERS] Lex and things... Leon (10:37)
RE: [HACKERS] Caution: tonight's commits force initdb Hiroshi Inoue (10:36)
AW: [HACKERS] Caution: tonight's commits force initdb Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5 (09:48)
Lex and things... Ansley, Michael (08:24)
Re: [HACKERS] Tangent ... you know what's scary? The Hermit Hacker (05:21)
Re: [HACKERS] Inefficiencies in COPY command Bruce Momjian (04:31)
Re: [HACKERS] Tangent ... you know what's scary? Bruce Momjian (04:02)
Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Bruce Momjian (04:01)
[no subject] Hub.Org News Admin (02:35)
Re: [HACKERS] vacuum process size Tatsuo Ishii (01:18)
23 August 1999
Re: [MIRRORS] Attempt to crack ftp site The Hermit Hacker (23:20)
Attempt to crack ftp site Daniele Orlandi (22:45)
Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: pull_var_clause: Cannot handle node type 108 Tom Lane (15:32)
Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: pull_var_clause: Cannot handle node type 108 José Soares (15:19)
Re: [HACKERS] Array-fields and many-to-many relations Tom Lane (14:24)
Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: pull_var_clause: Cannot handle node type 108 Tom Lane (14:21)
Re: [HACKERS] RE: [SQL] datediff function José Soares (14:04)
OID and PL/pgSQL trigger :-( Alke (13:54)
Array-fields and many-to-many relations Alke (13:53)
ERROR: pull_var_clause: Cannot handle node type 108 José Soares (13:08)
trigger: run in transaction Zakkr (12:08)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Bug#43221: postgresql: When disk is full, insert corrupts indices Vadim Mikheev (11:16)
[no subject] Hub.Org News Admin (09:40)
22 August 1999
Re: [HACKERS] Tangent ... you know what's scary? Adam Haberlach (18:48)
Re: [HACKERS] pg_log >> growing to infinity in 6.5.1 Theo Kramer (05:32)
Re: [HACKERS] pg_log >> growing to infinity in 6.5.1 Theo Kramer (03:29)
21 August 1999
Re: [HACKERS] Inefficiencies in COPY command Wayne Piekarski (06:33)
Caution: tonight's commits force initdb Tom Lane (03:59)
sorting by << correct for rtrees? Tom Lane (02:15)
20 August 1999
[no subject] Hub.Org News Admin (20:37)
Re: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Leon (18:30)
What does it mean? Dmitry Samersoff (16:37)
Re: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Tom Lane (16:33)
Re: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Tom Lane (16:20)
Re: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Brook Milligan (14:57)
RE: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Ansley, Michael (14:38)
RE: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Ansley, Michael (14:06)
Re: [HACKERS] Postgres' lexer Leon (13:34)