Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
213 messages
30 April 1999
Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer fed bad data about some system-table indexes Bruce Momjian (20:51)
Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer fed bad data about some system-table indexes Tom Lane (20:49)
Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer fed bad data about some system-table indexes Bruce Momjian (20:13)
Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer fed bad data about some system-table indexes Tom Lane (19:54)
Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer fed bad data about some system-table indexes Bruce Momjian (19:29)
Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer fed bad data about some system-table indexes Tom Lane (19:07)
Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer fed bad data about some system-table indexes Bruce Momjian (17:51)
Re: [HACKERS] can't compile Bruce Momjian (16:23)
Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Webpage The Hermit Hacker (16:13)
patches for 6.5.0 Massimo Dal Zotto (15:55)
Optimizer fed bad data about some system-table indexes Tom Lane (15:55)
Mailing list 'relay' sites ... News servers ... WWW/FTP Mirrors The Hermit Hacker (15:00)
Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Webpage Charles C. Bennett, Jr. (14:56)
Re: [HACKERS] -T option ignored? Tom Lane (13:57)
can't compile Vadim Mikheev (05:43)
-T option ignored? Tatsuo Ishii (01:03)
Re: [HACKERS] How do I get the backend server into gdb? Bruce Momjian (00:02)
29 April 1999
RE: [HACKERS] How do I get the backend server into gdb? Michael J Davis (23:11)
Re: [HACKERS] PLpgSQL Stat Problem Tom Lane (22:40)
Re: [HACKERS] How do I get the backend server into gdb? Tom Lane (22:34)
Problem with insert into select from using aggregation Michael J Davis (20:50)
Re: [HACKERS] How do I get the backend server into gdb? Massimo Dal Zotto (19:48)
Re: SIGBUS in AllocSetAlloc & jdbc Brian P Millett (19:15)
PLpgSQL Stat Problem Andy Lewis (18:27)
Re: [SQL] LIMIT José Soares (18:13)
Re: SIGBUS in AllocSetAlloc & jdbc Peter T Mount (18:11)
Re: [HACKERS] v6.5 Release Date ... The Hermit Hacker (17:15)
Numeric data types (formerly "v6.5 Release Date ...") Michael J Davis (16:54)
SIGBUS in AllocSetAlloc & jdbc Brian P Millett (16:40)
Re: [HACKERS] Help/advice/suggestions on query optimizer for a large table Thomas Lockhart (16:29)
Re: [HACKERS] v6.5 Release Date ... Bruce Momjian (16:15)
Re: [HACKERS] v6.5 Release Date ... Jan Wieck (16:09)
Re: [HACKERS] numeric data type on 6.5 Jan Wieck (16:04)
Re: [HACKERS] numeric data type on 6.5 Thomas Lockhart (15:25)
Help/advice/suggestions on query optimizer for a large table Martin Weinberg (15:21)
Re: [HACKERS] FYI: snapshot 4/28/1999 (fwd) Brian P Millett (14:59)
Re: [SQL] LIMIT Mark Jewiss (14:57)
Re: [HACKERS] FYI: snapshot 4/28/1999 (fwd) Tom Lane (14:21)
Re: [SQL] LIMIT José Soares (14:04)
Re: [SQL] LIMIT José Soares (13:58)
Re: [HACKERS] Lock freeze ? in MVCC Vadim Mikheev (12:29)
[no subject] Atsushi Mano (10:12)
AW: [HACKERS] Pg takes at least 2 hours to retrieve 7650 rows Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5 (08:59)
Re: [HACKERS] Pg takes at least 2 hours to retrieve 7650 rows Vadim Mikheev (08:47)
Pg takes at least 2 hours to retrieve 7650 rows José Soares (08:32)
RE: [HACKERS] FYI: snapshot 4/28/1999 (fwd) Peter Mount (07:34)
RE: [HACKERS] FYI: snapshot 4/28/1999 (fwd) Michael J Davis (06:08)
Re: [HACKERS] Lock freeze ? in MVCC Bruce Momjian (06:01)
FYI: snapshot 4/28/1999 (fwd) Peter T Mount (05:55)
Re: [HACKERS] EGCS becomes GCC Michael Meskes (05:47)
RE: [HACKERS] Lock freeze ? in MVCC Hiroshi Inoue (05:31)
Re: [HACKERS] numeric data type on 6.5 Thomas Lockhart (01:38)
RE: [HACKERS] Issues with the latest 6.5 source Michael J Davis (01:30)
28 April 1999
Re: [HACKERS] How do I get the backend server into gdb? Bruce Momjian (21:56)
Re: [HACKERS] How do I get the backend server into gdb? Tom Lane (21:50)
RE: [HACKERS] How do I get the backend server into gdb? Vince Vielhaber (21:05)
RE: [HACKERS] How do I get the backend server into gdb? Michael J Davis (20:51)
RE: [HACKERS] How do I get the backend server into gdb? Michael J Davis (20:38)
Re: [HACKERS] How do I get the backend server into gdb? Theo Kramer (20:09)
Re: [HACKERS] How do I get the backend server into gdb? Bruce Momjian (19:54)
RE: [HACKERS] How do I get the backend server into gdb? Michael J Davis (18:02)
RE: [HACKERS] How do I get the backend server into gdb? Michael J Davis (18:01)
RE: [HACKERS] How do I get the backend server into gdb? The Hermit Hacker (16:18)
RE: [HACKERS] How do I get the backend server into gdb? Michael J Davis (16:09)
rule bug again Brook Milligan (15:39)
Re: AW: [HACKERS] rules bug? Brook Milligan (14:19)
Re: [HACKERS] Issues with the latest 6.5 source Tom Lane (14:03)
Re: [HACKERS] numeric & decimal José Soares (13:05)
Re: [HACKERS] Hacker found bug in Postgres ? Cary O'Brien (13:04)
Re: [HACKERS] v6.5 Release Date ... The Hermit Hacker (12:31)
Re: [HACKERS] v6.5 Release Date ... Vince Vielhaber (12:11)
v6.5 Release Date ... The Hermit Hacker (12:07)
Re: [HACKERS] Lock freeze ? in MVCC Vadim Mikheev (11:12)
Re: [HACKERS] Lock freeze ? in MVCC Vadim Mikheev (11:03)
RE: [HACKERS] Lock freeze ? in MVCC Hiroshi Inoue (09:56)
Re: [HACKERS] EGCS becomes GCC Oleg Bartunov (08:39)
AW: [HACKERS] rules bug? Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5 (08:04)
Re: [HACKERS] EGCS becomes GCC Dmitry Samersoff (07:54)
Re: [HACKERS] EGCS becomes GCC Ryan Bradetich (07:46)
EGCS becomes GCC Oleg Broytmann (07:30)
rules bug? Brook Milligan (06:54)
Re: [HACKERS] Hacker found bug in Postgres ? Tom Lane (06:01)
RE: [HACKERS] Lock freeze ? in MVCC Hiroshi Inoue (05:39)
rule plan string too big? Brook Milligan (04:33)
Re: [HACKERS] Lock freeze ? in MVCC Bruce Momjian (04:00)
Re: [HACKERS] Lock freeze ? in MVCC Vadim Mikheev (04:00)
Re: [HACKERS] HSavage bug in Postgresql beta? Chris Bitmead (00:38)
27 April 1999
Issues with the latest 6.5 source Michael J Davis (21:35)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) Taral (19:54)
Re: [HACKERS] Number of tuples (20300) not the same as heap (20301) G. Anthony Reina (17:16)
Re: [HACKERS] Hacker found bug in Postgres ? Matthias Schmitt (17:10)
Re: [HACKERS] Hacker found bug in Postgres ? Matthias Schmitt (17:07)
Re: [HACKERS] Hacker found bug in Postgres ? Vince Vielhaber (17:00)
Re: [HACKERS] Hacker found bug in Postgres ? Bruce Momjian (16:49)
Re: [HACKERS] Lock freeze ? in MVCC Bruce Momjian (16:31)
Re: [HACKERS] RE: Mysql comparison Bruce Momjian (16:31)
Re: [HACKERS] numeric & decimal Bruce Momjian (16:31)
Hacker found bug in Postgres ? Matthias Schmitt (16:22)
Re: [HACKERS] views and group by (formerly: create view as selec Jan Wieck (16:22)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] unknown symbol 'lo_unlink' Tatsuo Ishii (15:07)
Re: [HACKERS] numeric data type on 6.5 Tom Lane (15:01)
Re: [HACKERS] views and group by (formerly: create view as selec Tom Lane (14:51)
Re: [HACKERS] RE: Mysql comparison Thomas Lockhart (14:42)
Re: [HACKERS] numeric data type on 6.5 Thomas Lockhart (14:28)
Re: [HACKERS] HSavage bug in Postgresql beta? Tom Lane (14:26)
Re: [HACKERS] RE: Mysql comparison Oleg Broytmann (14:02)
Re: [HACKERS] numeric data type on 6.5 Jan Wieck (13:55)
Re: [HACKERS] views and group by (formerly: create view as selec Jan Wieck (13:55)
Re: [HACKERS] RE: Mysql comparison Thomas Lockhart (13:53)
TRAP: Bad Argument to Function Call Brian P Millett (13:49)
Re: [HACKERS] numeric & decimal Jan Wieck (13:35)
Re: [GENERAL] unknown symbol 'lo_unlink' JP Rosevear (13:29)
Re: [HACKERS] numeric & decimal Jan Wieck (13:27)
RE: [INTERFACES] JDBC and waiting for commit on a locked table in 6.4.2 Peter Mount (11:33)
Re: [INTERFACES] JDBC and waiting for commit on a locked table in6.4.2 Vadim Mikheev (10:53)
Re: [HACKERS] Lock freeze ? in MVCC Vadim Mikheev (10:52)
RE: [HACKERS] Lock freeze ? in MVCC Hiroshi Inoue (10:20)
Re: [HACKERS] It would be nice if this could be fixed... Chris Bitmead (10:18)
Re: [HACKERS] It would be nice if this could be fixed... Chris Bitmead (10:08)
fix for _copyUnique() Tatsuo Ishii (09:59)
Re: [HACKERS] numeric data type on 6.5 Tatsuo Ishii (09:48)
Re: [HACKERS] numeric data type on 6.5 D'Arcy (09:37)
numeric data type on 6.5 Tatsuo Ishii (09:10)
Re: [HACKERS] psql bug ? José Soares (08:20)
HSavage bug in Postgresql beta? Chris Bitmead (05:15)
Re: [HACKERS] Lock freeze ? in MVCC Bruce Momjian (05:00)
Re: [HACKERS] RE: Mysql comparison Tom (04:51)
Lock freeze ? in MVCC Hiroshi Inoue (03:45)
Re: [HACKERS] MVCC Question Todd Graham Lewis (03:29)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) Todd Graham Lewis (02:57)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) Taral (02:50)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) The Hermit Hacker (02:42)
Re: [HACKERS] Efficiency of LIMIT ? Leslie Mikesell (01:53)
unknown symbol 'lo_unlink' Tatsuo Ishii (01:32)
Re: [HACKERS] Number of tuples (20300) not the same as heap (20301) Tim Perdue (01:29)
Number of tuples (20300) not the same as heap (20301) G. Anthony Reina (01:17)
RE: Mysql comparison Vince Vielhaber (01:06)
26 April 1999
Re: [HACKERS] Re: ERROR: index_rescan: invalid amrescan regproc ??? Brian P Millett (20:58)
Re: [HACKERS] create view as select distinct (fwd) Ryan Bradetich (19:07)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) Todd Graham Lewis (18:48)
Quoting backticks golliher (18:45)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) Michael Lausch (18:40)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) Taral (18:25)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) Taral (18:21)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) Taral (18:20)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) Todd Graham Lewis (18:20)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) Todd Graham Lewis (18:19)
Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) Taral (18:14)
Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) Taral (18:07)
Re: [HACKERS] It would be nice if this could be fixed... The Hermit Hacker (16:39)
[Fwd: 6.5beta] Clayton Cottingham (16:14)
CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) Goran Thyni (15:52)
Re: [HACKERS] create view as select distinct (fwd) Jan Wieck (15:47)
Re: [HACKERS] psql bug ? Bruce Momjian (15:24)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: ERROR: index_rescan: invalid amrescan regproc ??? Tom Lane (14:59)
Re: [HACKERS] psql bug ? Tom Lane (14:59)
Re: [HACKERS] It would be nice if this could be fixed... Jan Wieck (14:51)
Re: [HACKERS] It would be nice if this could be fixed... The Hermit Hacker (14:38)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: ERROR: index_rescan: invalid amrescan regproc ??? Brian P Millett (14:19)
psql bug ? José Soares (13:42)
Re: [HACKERS] regression output The Hermit Hacker (13:40)
decimal and numeric types José Soares (09:03)
Re: [INTERFACES] CASE tools? (slightly off-topic) Oleg Bartunov (07:48)
Re: [INTERFACES] CASE tools? (slightly off-topic) Oleg Bartunov (07:46)
AW: [HACKERS] Re: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol hand ling Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5 (07:01)
Re: [HACKERS] A patch for FATAL 1:btree: BTP_CHAIN flag was expected Vadim Mikheev (06:57)
Re: [HACKERS] create view as select distinct (fwd) Jan Wieck (06:56)
Re: [HACKERS] Cygwin32 fix for current Tatsuo Ishii (04:47)
Re: [HACKERS] A patch for FATAL 1:btree: BTP_CHAIN flag was expected Tatsuo Ishii (02:53)
Re: [HACKERS] Functions with aggregations (i.e. group by) causes an abort Tom Lane (00:47)
25 April 1999
Re: [HACKERS] create view as select distinct (fwd) Ryan Bradetich (19:42)
Re: [HACKERS] Efficiency of LIMIT ? Bruce Momjian (19:41)
Re: [HACKERS] Efficiency of LIMIT ? Adam Haberlach (18:49)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
pgsql-hackers 1999-04 Chronological Index (1/2)
Last updated: Wed Jan 18 03:38:46 2012213 messages
- Thread Index
- [Prev Page]
- [Next Page]
- 01 May 1999
- A select with aggretion is failing, still subtle problems with ag gregation Michael J Davis (03:38)
- Re: [HACKERS] Optimizer fed bad data about some system-table indexes Bruce Momjian (20:57)
- Re: [HACKERS] PLpgSQL Stat Problem Andy Lewis (23:23)
- Re: [HACKERS] Issues with the latest 6.5 source Tom Lane (22:29)
- Looking for an old LabVIEW SQL toolkit licence... J.V. (21:38)
- RE: [HACKERS] views and group by (formerly: create view as selec t distinct) Michael J Davis (23:10)
- Functions with aggregations (i.e. group by) causes an abort Michael J Davis (21:13)
- Thread Index
- [Prev Page]
- [Next Page]