• Text Size: Normal / Large
• Donate
• Contact

Section Navigation

• Community
• Contributors
• Mailing Lists
  • Subscribe
  • User lists
  • Developer lists
    • pgsql-cluster-hackers
    • pgsql-committers
    • pgsql-hackers
    • pgsql-rrreviewers
    • pgsql-testers
    • pgsql-www
  • Regional lists
  • Associations
  • User groups
  • Project lists
  • Inactive lists
• IRC
• Featured Users
• International Sites
• Propaganda
• Resources
• Weekly News
• Community login
  • Profile
  • Lost password

pgsql-hackers 1999-02 Chronological Index (1/4)

• Thread Index
• [Prev Page]
• [Next Page]

• 01 March 1999
  • IMPORTANT NOTICE II: pgsql-loophole(at)postgresql(dot)org The Hermit Hacker (01:20)
  • IMPORTANT NOTICE: pgsql-loophole(at)postgresql(dot)org The Hermit Hacker (00:50)
  • pgsql-loophole(at)postgresql(dot)org The Hermit Hacker (00:46)
  • Re: [HACKERS] libpq and SPI Gerald L. Gay (00:03)
• 28 February 1999
  • Testing news2mail gateway ... Marc G. Fournier (21:34)
  • hello dana lapidot (16:21)
  • Test 2...news2mail ... Marc G. Fournier (07:50)
• 27 February 1999
  • Re: [HACKERS] libpq and SPI frankpit (16:52)
  • Inherit View Clark Evans (00:11)
• 26 February 1999
  • Web page mail archive Ryan Bradetich (23:14)
  • Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE problem on linux Oleg Broytmann (10:56)
  • Re: [HACKERS] postmaster failure with 2-23 snapshot Tom Ivar Helbekkmo (07:24)
  • Re: [HACKERS] libpq and SPI Gerald L. Gay (01:06)
  • Re: [HACKERS] shouldn't pg_dumpall... Tom Lane (00:15)
• 25 February 1999
  • Re: [HACKERS] postmaster failure with 2-23 snapshot Tom Lane (23:31)
  • RE: [HACKERS] Linux: semaphores: How? Daryl W. Dunbar (23:17)
  • shouldn't pg_dumpall... Vince Vielhaber (22:50)
  • [no subject] budin (20:39)
  • Re: [HACKERS] postmaster failure with 2-23 snapshot The Hermit Hacker (19:10)
  • Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE problem on linux Ross J. Reedstrom (18:25)
  • Re: [HACKERS] postmaster failure with 2-23 snapshot Bruce Momjian (18:00)
  • Re: [HACKERS] postmaster failure with 2-23 snapshot Bruce Momjian (17:59)
  • Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE problem on linux Bruce Momjian (17:58)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Linux: semaphores: How? Oleg Broytmann (17:42)
  • Linux: semaphores: How? Terry Mackintosh (17:38)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Current tree is busted Bruce Momjian (17:28)
  • Re: [HACKERS] postmaster failure with 2-23 snapshot Ross J. Reedstrom (16:51)
  • Re: [HACKERS] postmaster failure with 2-23 snapshot Brian P Millett (16:51)
  • RE: [INTERFACES] Foreign Keys Michael Davis (16:48)
  • Re: [INTERFACES] Foreign Keys Byron Nikolaidis (16:16)
  • Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE problem on linux Angelos Karageorgiou (16:01)
  • Foreign Keys Michael Davis (15:34)
  • Re: [HACKERS] postmaster failure with 2-23 snapshot The Hermit Hacker (15:16)
  • Re: [HACKERS] libpq and SPI Tom Lane (14:55)
  • Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE problem on linux Oleg Broytmann (14:44)
  • Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE problem on linux Tom Lane (14:35)
  • Re: [HACKERS] postmaster failure with 2-23 snapshot Tom Lane (14:30)
  • Re: [HACKERS] postmaster failure with 2-23 snapshot Tom Ivar Helbekkmo (10:53)
  • RE: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE problem on linux Oleg Broytmann (08:59)
  • [CURRENT] large object fix Tatsuo Ishii (07:33)
  • Re: [HACKERS] KTH-KRB kerberos 4 patch Tom Ivar Helbekkmo (06:53)
  • Re: [HACKERS] postmaster failure with 2-23 snapshot Tom Ivar Helbekkmo (06:52)
  • Current tree is busted Tom Lane (05:15)
  • libpq and SPI Gerald L. Gay (05:09)
  • RE: [HACKERS] copyObject() ? Hiroshi Inoue (01:55)
  • BTW, datetime is busted in REL6_4 branch Tom Lane (01:51)
  • Re: [HACKERS] large objects failing (hpux10.20 sparc/solaris 2.6, gcc 2.8.1) Tatsuo Ishii (01:42)
  • Praise RHS Linux User (00:06)
• 24 February 1999
  • timezones revisited Vince Vielhaber (23:36)
  • RE: [HACKERS] OUTER joins Michael Davis (21:34)
  • OUTER joins Bruce Momjian (21:11)
  • RE: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE problem on linux Dan Gowin (20:05)
  • Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE problem on linux Tom Lane (18:36)
  • Re: [HACKERS] large objects failing (hpux10.20 sparc/solaris 2.6, gcc 2.8.1) Ron Snyder (17:34)
  • Re: [HACKERS] One I've never seen before: Bruce Momjian (17:32)
  • Re: [HACKERS] One I've never seen before: Bruce Momjian (17:31)
  • Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE problem on linux Oleg Broytmann (15:58)
  • Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE problem on linux Oleg Broytmann (15:48)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Problem with complex query Oleg Broytmann (15:36)
  • Re: [HACKERS] postmaster failure with 2-23 snapshot Tom Lane (15:34)
  • Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE problem on linux Vince Vielhaber (15:28)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Problem with complex query Tom Lane (15:26)
  • Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE problem on linux Oleg Broytmann (15:24)
  • Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE problem on linux Tom Lane (14:58)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Transaction logging Jan Wieck (14:29)
  • Re: [HACKERS] postmaster failure with 2-23 snapshot Brian P Millett (14:13)
  • Problem with complex query Oleg Broytmann (13:03)
  • Re: [HACKERS] OUTER joins Bruce Momjian (10:30)
  • OUTER joins Bruce Momjian (09:58)
  • Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM ANALYZE problem on linux Oleg Broytmann (09:49)
  • KTH-KRB kerberos 4 patch Rodney McDuff (05:04)
  • IN list and OR processing Bruce Momjian (04:46)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Transaction logging Bruce Momjian (04:43)
  • RE: [HACKERS] Transaction logging Michael Davis (04:34)
  • Re: [HACKERS] inet data type regression test fails Bruce Momjian (03:17)
  • Re: [GENERAL] Transaction logging Bruce Momjian (03:06)
  • Re: [HACKERS] inet data type regression test fails Tatsuo Ishii (03:03)
  • RE: [HACKERS] postmaster failure with 2-23 snapshot Daryl W. Dunbar (01:39)
  • Re: [HACKERS] postmaster failure with 2-23 snapshot Tom Lane (00:04)
• 23 February 1999
  • quick Date question Jackson, DeJuan (23:54)
  • RE: [GENERAL] Transaction logging Michael Davis (18:19)
  • Re: [HACKERS] discussion on proposed int8_ops patch Thomas G. Lockhart (18:07)
  • postmaster failure with 2-23 snapshot Brian P Millett (15:41)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Alterations to backend/client protocol Tom Lane (15:38)
  • postmaster fails with 2-23 snapshot Brian P Millett (15:33)
  • Re: [HACKERS] copyObject() ? Bruce Momjian (15:31)
  • Re: [HACKERS] copyObject() ? Tom Lane (15:17)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: Anyone understand shared-memory space usage? Tom Lane (15:07)
  • Alterations to backend/client protocol Philip Shiels (13:17)
  • Error messages, outer joins, etc Thomas G. Lockhart (08:14)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: Anyone understand shared-memory space usage? Bruce Momjian (04:00)
  • Re: [GENERAL] Postgres Future: Postgres on Digital Alpha Bruce Momjian (03:57)
  • Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules Thomas G. Lockhart (03:53)
  • Re: [HACKERS] SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT) Thomas G. Lockhart (03:13)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Updated developers list Bruce Momjian (03:01)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/src/test/regress/expected rules.out' Thomas G. Lockhart (02:58)
  • Re: [HACKERS] inet data type regression test fails Thomas G. Lockhart (02:49)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Updated developers list RHS Linux User (02:24)
  • Re: Anyone understand shared-memory space usage? Tom Lane (00:50)
  • copyObject() ? Hiroshi Inoue (00:10)
  • subscribe Chuang Fang-sheng (00:00)
• 22 February 1999
  • discussion on proposed int8_ops patch Ryan Bradetich (23:26)
  • Developers FAQ Bruce Momjian (22:16)
  • Updated developers list Bruce Momjian (21:28)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: Max backend limits cleaned up Bruce Momjian (19:38)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: Max backend limits cleaned up Tom Lane (17:53)
  • Re: Anyone understand shared-memory space usage? Tom Lane (17:41)
  • RE: [HACKERS] Re: Max backend limits cleaned up Daryl W. Dunbar (17:17)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: Max backend limits cleaned up Bruce Momjian (16:59)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: Max backend limits cleaned up Bruce Momjian (16:55)
  • Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules Bruce Momjian (16:49)
  • Re: start on outer join Bruce Momjian (16:47)
  • Re: [HACKERS] large objects failing (hpux10.20 sparc/solaris 2.6, gcc 2.8.1) Bruce Momjian (16:47)
  • Re: [HACKERS] optimizer cleanup Bruce Momjian (16:47)
  • Problem with complex join Oleg Broytmann (16:15)
  • RE: [HACKERS] Re: Max backend limits cleaned up Daryl W. Dunbar (16:08)
  • RE: [HACKERS] Re: Max backend limits cleaned up Michael Davis (16:07)
  • Re: [HACKERS] lower() broken? jose' soares (15:44)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: Max backend limits cleaned up Tom Lane (15:11)
  • Re: [HACKERS] inet data type regression test fails Tatsuo Ishii (14:09)
  • Re: [HACKERS] SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT) Andy Selle (13:46)
  • SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT) Oleg Broytmann (13:30)
  • Re: [HACKERS] trouble with rules Jan Wieck (10:09)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/src/test/regress/expected rules.out' Jan Wieck (10:00)
  • Playing with postgres Mohamed Hefny (09:42)
  • Tables names from query Philip Shiels (08:35)
  • Re: [HACKERS] large objects failing (hpux10.20 sparc/solaris 2.6, gcc 2.8.1) Tatsuo Ishii (07:30)
  • Re: [HACKERS] optimizer cleanup Thomas G. Lockhart (07:06)
  • Re: start on outer join Thomas G. Lockhart (06:57)
  • New source control system Taral (06:32)
  • lappend vs. lcons Bruce Momjian (06:30)
  • optimizer cleanup Bruce Momjian (06:02)
  • Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/src/test/regress/expected rules.out' Bruce Momjian (03:30)
  • Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/src/test/regress/expected rules.out' Thomas G. Lockhart (02:58)
  • inet data type regression test fails Tatsuo Ishii (02:54)
• 21 February 1999
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: Max backend limits cleaned up Bruce Momjian (22:32)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: Max backend limits cleaned up Bruce Momjian (22:32)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Update contributors page D'Arcy (22:30)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Anyone understand shared-memory space usage? Bruce Momjian (21:32)
  • Update contributors page Bruce Momjian (20:52)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Anyone understand shared-memory space usage? Bruce Momjian (19:29)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: Max backend limits cleaned up Bruce Momjian (19:28)
  • Anyone understand shared-memory space usage? Tom Lane (18:58)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: Max backend limits cleaned up Tom Lane (18:44)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: Max backend limits cleaned up Bruce Momjian (04:00)
  • Re: Max backend limits cleaned up Tom Lane (03:48)
• 20 February 1999
  • Re: [HACKERS] Major bug, possible, with Solaris 7? Tom Lane (21:50)
  • Bug in src/backend/nodes/print.c James Thompson (21:41)
  • RE: [HACKERS] Major bug, possible, with Solaris 7? Daryl W. Dunbar (19:22)
  • RE: [HACKERS] Major bug, possible, with Solaris 7? Daryl W. Dunbar (16:26)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] SQL-Query 2 get primary key Thomas G. Lockhart (16:17)
  • A few questions (was: SQL-Query 2 get primary key) Hannu Krosing (16:05)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] SQL-Query 2 get primary key Hannu Krosing (12:36)
  • Re: [HACKERS] lower() broken? Thomas G. Lockhart (06:17)
  • Re: [HACKERS] lower() broken? Vince Vielhaber (05:02)
  • Re: [SQL] SQL-Query 2 get primary key D'Arcy (04:59)
  • Re: [HACKERS] lower() broken? Roland Roberts (04:50)
  • RE: [HACKERS] Major bug, possible, with Solaris 7? The Hermit Hacker (04:48)
  • RE: [HACKERS] Major bug, possible, with Solaris 7? Daryl W. Dunbar (03:50)
  • Re: [HACKERS] lower() broken? Vince Vielhaber (03:43)
  • RE: [HACKERS] Major bug, possible, with Solaris 7? The Hermit Hacker (03:39)
  • Re: [HACKERS] lower() broken? Thomas G. Lockhart (02:45)
  • Re: [HACKERS] large objects failing (hpux10.20 sparc/solaris 2.6, gcc 2.8.1) Tatsuo Ishii (02:19)
• 19 February 1999
  • RE: [HACKERS] Major bug, possible, with Solaris 7? Daryl W. Dunbar (22:38)
  • New optimizer README Bruce Momjian (19:28)
  • Re: [HACKERS] large objects failing (hpux10.20 sparc/solaris 2.6, gcc 2.8.1) Ron Snyder (18:50)
  • lower() broken? Vince Vielhaber (18:31)
  • Major bug, possible, with Solaris 7? The Hermit Hacker (17:45)
  • What does it means? Dmitry Samersoff (14:17)
  • Re: [HACKERS] large objects failing (hpux10.20 sparc/solaris 2.6, gcc 2.8.1) Tatsuo Ishii (14:17)
  • Max backend limits cleaned up Tom Lane (06:58)
• 18 February 1999
  • large objects failing (hpux10.20 sparc/solaris 2.6, gcc 2.8.1) Ron Snyder (22:14)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Continued problems with pgdump, Large Objects and crashing backends Peter T Mount (22:04)
  • Re: [HACKERS] 6.4 Build Error from CVS snapshot Bruce Momjian (21:02)
  • RE: [HACKERS] 6.4 Build Error from CVS snapshot Vince Vielhaber (20:58)
  • 6.4 Build Error from CVS snapshot Clark Evans (20:32)
  • 6.4 Build Error from CVS snapshot Clark Evans (20:11)
  • Re: [HACKERS] CVS overwrite on merge fail? Bruce Momjian (19:54)
  • Re: [HACKERS] CVS overwrite on merge fail? Egon Schmid (19:36)
  • CVS overwrite on merge fail? Clark Evans (19:27)

• Thread Index
• [Prev Page]
• [Next Page]