• Text Size: Normal / Large
• Donate
• Contact

Section Navigation

• Community
• Contributors
• Mailing Lists
  • Subscribe
  • User lists
  • Developer lists
    • pgsql-cluster-hackers
    • pgsql-committers
    • pgsql-hackers
    • pgsql-rrreviewers
    • pgsql-testers
    • pgsql-www
  • Regional lists
  • Associations
  • User groups
  • Project lists
  • Inactive lists
• IRC
• Featured Users
• International Sites
• Propaganda
• Resources
• Weekly News
• Community login
  • Profile
  • Lost password

pgsql-hackers 1999-01 Thread Index (1/5)

• Main Index
• [Prev Page]
• [Next Page]

• Re: [HACKERS] READ COMMITTED isolevel is implemented ... Vadim Mikheev (Mon 01 04:54)
• Table exists, but not accessible? Thomas Reinke (Mon 01 00:06)
• Re: vacuumdb? D'Arcy (Sun 31 03:27)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: vacuumdb? Tom Lane (Sun 31 17:23)
• Backends and semaphores Cary O'Brien (Sun 31 01:11)
• Re: [HACKERS] Postmaster dies with many child processes Cary O'Brien (Sat 30 14:09)
• ERROR: heap_fetch: xinv19201 relation: ReadBuffer(81aeefe) failed Ian Grant (Sat 30 13:01)
• ERROR: heap_fetch: xinv19073 relation: ReadBuffer(81aeefe) failed Ian Grant (Sat 30 12:49)
• ERROR: heap_fetch: xinv19073 relation: ReadBuffer(81aeefe) failed Ian Grant (Sat 30 12:41)
• Re: [GENERAL] nested loops in joins, ambiguous rewrite rules Charles Hornberger (Sat 30 02:09)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [GENERAL] nested loops in joins, ambiguous rewrite rules Charles Hornberger (Sat 30 04:05)
• Re: [GENERAL] nested loops in joins, ambiguous rewrite rules Charles Hornberger (Sat 30 04:20)
• Re: [HACKERS] nested loops in joins, ambiguous rewrite rules Tom Lane (Sat 30 21:08)
• Re: [HACKERS] nested loops in joins, ambiguous rewrite rules Charles Hornberger (Sun 31 02:35)
• Re: [HACKERS] nested loops in joins, ambiguous rewrite rules Bruce Momjian (Sun 31 03:31)
• Re: [HACKERS] nested loops in joins, ambiguous rewrite rules Charles Hornberger (Sun 31 05:38)
• Re: [HACKERS] nested loops in joins, ambiguous rewrite rules Bruce Momjian (Sun 31 07:00)
• Re: [HACKERS] nested loops in joins, ambiguous rewrite rules Tom Lane (Sun 31 18:59)
• Re: [HACKERS] nested loops in joins, ambiguous rewrite rules Bruce Momjian (Sun 31 19:36)
• Problems with anon CVS? Keith Parks (Fri 29 22:05)
• Re: [HACKERS] Problems with anon CVS? Dr. Ernst Molitor (Sat 30 10:37)
• Re: Problems with anon CVS? The Hermit Hacker (Sun 31 20:23)
• Visionary Dan Gowin (Fri 29 21:05)
• Re: [HACKERS] Visionary Bruce Momjian (Sat 30 06:31)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: Visionary Michael Robinson (Sat 30 07:55)
• Re: Visionary Michael Robinson (Sat 30 08:08)
• License for PostgreSQL Contributions (Was: RE: DOM Implementation for C++) Clark Evans (Fri 29 20:18)
• another ecpg patch Michael Meskes (Fri 29 18:13)
• READ COMMITTED isolevel is implemented ... Vadim Mikheev (Fri 29 17:55)
• RE: [HACKERS] READ COMMITTED isolevel is implemented ... Hiroshi Inoue (Sat 30 00:02)
• Re: [HACKERS] READ COMMITTED isolevel is implemented ... Vadim Mikheev (Sat 30 04:40)
• RE: [HACKERS] READ COMMITTED isolevel is implemented ... Hiroshi Inoue (Sat 30 06:27)
• Re: [HACKERS] READ COMMITTED isolevel is implemented ... Vadim Mikheev (Sat 30 11:07)
• Re: [HACKERS] READ COMMITTED isolevel is implemented ... Bruce Momjian (Sat 30 06:31)
• Re: [HACKERS] READ COMMITTED isolevel is implemented ... Vadim Mikheev (Sat 30 11:12)
• Re: [HACKERS] READ COMMITTED isolevel is implemented ... Hannu Krosing (Sat 30 11:45)
• Re: [HACKERS] READ COMMITTED isolevel is implemented ... Tatsuo Ishii (Sun 31 09:22)
• Re: [HACKERS] READ COMMITTED isolevel is implemented ... Vadim Mikheev (Mon 01 03:05)
• Re: postgres v6.0 and pgsql-docs-digest V1 #401 Hannu Krosing (Fri 29 17:20)
• Re: [DOCS] Re: postgres v6.0 and pgsql-docs-digest V1 #401 The Hermit Hacker (Sat 30 20:37)
• Re: SELECT DISTINCT ON ... ORDER BY ... Tom Lane (Fri 29 17:04)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: SELECT DISTINCT ON ... ORDER BY ... Oliver Elphick (Fri 29 18:24)
• VACUUM ANALYZE failed on linux Oleg Broytmann (Fri 29 16:13)
• Re: [HACKERS] Postmaster dies with many child processes (spinlock/semget failed) Patrick Verdon (Fri 29 16:05)
• Re: [HACKERS] Postmaster dies with many child processes (spinlock/semget failed) Hannu Krosing (Fri 29 17:03)
• Re: [HACKERS] Postmaster dies with many child processes (spinlock/semget failed) Tom Lane (Fri 29 18:15)
• Re: [HACKERS] Postmaster dies with many child processes (spinlock/semget failed) Tatsuo Ishii (Sat 30 01:22)
• Re: [HACKERS] Postmaster dies with many child processes (spinlock/semget failed) Tom Lane (Sat 30 20:19)
• Reducing sema usage (was Postmaster dies with many child processes) Tom Lane (Sun 31 00:12)
• Re: Reducing sema usage (was Postmaster dies with many child processes) Tom Lane (Sun 31 00:43)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: Reducing sema usage (was Postmaster dies with many child processes) Bruce Momjian (Sun 31 02:02)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: Reducing sema usage (was Postmaster dies with many child processes) Tom Lane (Sun 31 18:01)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: Reducing sema usage (was Postmaster dies with many child processes) Oliver Elphick (Sun 31 21:33)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: Reducing sema usage (was Postmaster dies with many child processes) Tom Lane (Sun 31 23:04)
• Re: [HACKERS] Reducing sema usage (was Postmaster dies with many child processes) The Hermit Hacker (Sun 31 01:56)
• Re: [HACKERS] Reducing sema usage (was Postmaster dies with many child processes) Bruce Momjian (Sun 31 02:02)
• Re: [HACKERS] Reducing sema usage (was Postmaster dies with many child processes) Vadim Mikheev (Mon 01 02:45)
• Re: [HACKERS] Postmaster dies with many child processes (spinlock/semget failed) The Hermit Hacker (Sat 30 08:06)
• AW: [HACKERS] Another TEMP table trick Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5 (Fri 29 08:38)
• Re: AW: [HACKERS] Another TEMP table trick Bruce Momjian (Sat 30 05:30)
• Re: AW: [HACKERS] Another TEMP table trick Hannu Krosing (Sat 30 11:42)
• Re: AW: [HACKERS] Another TEMP table trick Bruce Momjian (Sun 31 01:31)
• equal: don't know whether nodes of type 600 are equal Vadim Mikheev (Fri 29 07:07)
• Postmaster dies with many child processes (spinlock/semget failed) Patrick Verdon (Thu 28 23:40)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Postmaster dies with many child processes (spinlock/semget failed) Patrick Verdon (Thu 28 23:51)
• Re: [HACKERS] Postmaster dies with many child processes (spinlock/semget failed) Tatsuo Ishii (Fri 29 01:10)
• Re: [HACKERS] Postmaster dies with many child processes (spinlock/semget failed) The Hermit Hacker (Fri 29 01:32)
• Re: [HACKERS] Postmaster dies with many child processes (spinlock/semget failed) Vadim Mikheev (Fri 29 03:06)
• Re: [HACKERS] Postmaster dies with many child processes (spinlock/semget failed) Oleg Bartunov (Fri 29 06:41)
• Another TEMP table trick Bruce Momjian (Thu 28 23:19)
• Re: [HACKERS] Another TEMP table trick Bruce Momjian (Thu 28 23:32)
• [Fwd: DBD::Pg::db do failed: pqReadData() Error] Edmund Mergl (Thu 28 21:48)
• TEMP table code Bruce Momjian (Thu 28 21:39)
• Re: [HACKERS] TEMP table code Thomas G. Lockhart (Fri 29 06:18)
• Re: [HACKERS] TEMP table code Bruce Momjian (Fri 29 07:00)
• Theory and practice of free software Tom Lane (Thu 28 18:44)
• Using PostgreSQL in spite of ASE silvio_paiva (Thu 28 18:00)
• (Fwd) Re: [ADMIN] Running Postgres on a HP-Ux 10.10 System Reiner Nippes (Thu 28 14:19)
• Bug or feature? COPY ignores column defaults Oliver Elphick (Thu 28 13:28)
• Re: [HACKERS] Bug or feature? COPY ignores column defaults Vadim Mikheev (Thu 28 14:12)
• Re: [HACKERS] Bug or feature? COPY ignores column defaults Jan Wieck (Thu 28 14:30)
• Re: [HACKERS] Bug or feature? COPY ignores column defaults Oliver Elphick (Thu 28 15:07)
• Re: [HACKERS] Bug or feature? COPY ignores column defaults Tom Lane (Thu 28 19:50)
• Re: [HACKERS] Bug or feature? COPY ignores column defaults Tom Lane (Thu 28 20:06)
• Re: [HACKERS] Bug or feature? COPY ignores column defaults Tom Lane (Thu 28 15:43)
• PL/pgSQL mixed case support Jan Wieck (Thu 28 11:54)
• new heap manager mmalloc Ulrich Voss (Thu 28 11:05)
• Re: [HACKERS] new heap manager mmalloc The Hermit Hacker (Thu 28 12:41)
• Re: [HACKERS] new heap manager mmalloc Tom Lane (Thu 28 15:51)
• Re: [HACKERS] new heap manager mmalloc Bruce Momjian (Thu 28 18:02)
• Re: [HACKERS] new heap manager mmalloc Tom Lane (Thu 28 19:03)
• Re: [HACKERS] new heap manager mmalloc Jan Wieck (Fri 29 14:02)
• Re: [HACKERS] new heap manager mmalloc Bruce Momjian (Sat 30 05:30)
• Re: [HACKERS] new heap manager mmalloc Patrick Welche (Sat 30 15:08)
• Testing... Marc G. Fournier (Thu 28 10:06)
• Death! The Hermit Hacker (Thu 28 09:54)
• Re: [HACKERS] Death! Oleg Broytmann (Thu 28 10:12)
• Re: [HACKERS] Death! The Hermit Hacker (Thu 28 12:41)
• Re: [HACKERS] Death! Oleg Broytmann (Thu 28 14:15)
• Tsest .. The Hermit Hacker (Thu 28 09:52)
• Test two... The Hermit Hacker (Thu 28 09:51)
• Another small ecpg bug fixed Michael Meskes (Thu 28 06:44)
• FOR UPDATE question Michael Meskes (Thu 28 06:44)
• Re: [HACKERS] FOR UPDATE question Vadim Mikheev (Thu 28 08:22)
• NAN on FreeBSD 2.2.8 Vince Vielhaber (Wed 27 23:45)
• Re: [HACKERS] NAN on FreeBSD 2.2.8 The Hermit Hacker (Thu 28 00:19)
• Re: [HACKERS] NAN on FreeBSD 2.2.8 Vince Vielhaber (Thu 28 01:48)
• Re: [HACKERS] NAN on FreeBSD 2.2.8 Bruce Momjian (Thu 28 02:02)
• Re: [HACKERS] NAN on FreeBSD 2.2.8 Vince Vielhaber (Thu 28 02:43)
• Something wacko about EXPLAIN cost stats Tom Lane (Wed 27 20:19)
• PL/pgSQL and SPI Jan Wieck (Wed 27 17:01)
• Re: [HACKERS] PL/pgSQL and SPI Vadim Mikheev (Wed 27 17:43)
• Re: [HACKERS] PL/pgSQL and SPI Jan Wieck (Wed 27 17:58)
• Re: [HACKERS] PL/pgSQL and SPI Vadim Mikheev (Wed 27 18:44)
• Re: [HACKERS] PL/pgSQL and SPI Vadim Mikheev (Wed 27 21:27)
• Re: [HACKERS] PL/pgSQL and SPI Jan Wieck (Thu 28 12:24)
• TEMP tables Bruce Momjian (Wed 27 17:00)
• Re: [HACKERS] TEMP tables Vadim Mikheev (Wed 27 17:10)
• Re: [HACKERS] TEMP tables Bruce Momjian (Wed 27 18:00)
• Re: [HACKERS] Problem with multiple SUMs Bruce Momjian (Wed 27 16:00)
• Re: [HACKERS] Problem with multiple SUMs D'Arcy (Thu 28 01:34)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• RE: [HACKERS] Problem with multiple SUMs Jackson, DeJuan (Thu 28 16:27)
• Re: [HACKERS] Problem with multiple SUMs D'Arcy (Thu 28 17:23)
• RE: [HACKERS] Problem with multiple SUMs Jackson, DeJuan (Thu 28 19:45)
• regression test HAVING fixed Bruce Momjian (Wed 27 16:00)
• Re: [HACKERS] regression test HAVING fixed Tom Lane (Wed 27 18:36)
• Re: [HACKERS] regression test HAVING fixed Vadim Mikheev (Wed 27 18:53)
• Problem with multiple SUMs D'Arcy (Wed 27 12:51)
• Re: [HACKERS] Problem with multiple SUMs Bruce Momjian (Wed 27 14:30)
• Re: [HACKERS] Problem with multiple SUMs Tom Lane (Wed 27 15:32)
• Re: [HACKERS] Problem with multiple SUMs Bruce Momjian (Wed 27 16:17)
• MB big5 support patch (current) Tatsuo Ishii (Wed 27 07:23)
• mb support fix Tatsuo Ishii (Wed 27 00:59)
• Re: [PATCHES] mb support fix The Hermit Hacker (Wed 27 01:18)
• dump doesn't save views and blobs lorenzo (Tue 26 18:56)
• Re: Non-blocking queries in postgresql Bruce Momjian (Tue 26 15:54)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: Non-blocking queries in postgresql Bruce Momjian (Wed 27 14:30)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: Non-blocking queries in postgresql Tom Lane (Wed 27 16:07)
• Primary keys additional D'Arcy (Tue 26 13:45)
• Re: [HACKERS] Primary keys additional D'Arcy (Tue 26 14:14)
• Major breakage? Tom Lane (Tue 26 06:56)
• Re: [HACKERS] Major breakage? Vadim Mikheev (Tue 26 13:06)
• Re: [HACKERS] Major breakage? Tom Lane (Tue 26 19:45)
• Re: [HACKERS] Major breakage? Bruce Momjian (Tue 26 22:06)
• Re: [HACKERS] Major breakage? Vadim Mikheev (Wed 27 02:24)
• help bug and comment char. Terry Mackintosh (Tue 26 00:38)
• Re: [HACKERS] help bug and comment char. Thomas G. Lockhart (Tue 26 03:19)
• handling 64bit time_t's Adrian Gartland (Mon 25 19:48)
• Re: [HACKERS] handling 64bit time_t's Thomas G. Lockhart (Tue 26 03:10)
• RE: [HACKERS] FW: [CORE] create database bug Dan Gowin (Mon 25 18:42)
• Re: [HACKERS] FW: [CORE] create database bug Tom Lane (Mon 25 23:45)
• FW: [CORE] create database bug Dan Gowin (Mon 25 16:55)
• Re: [HACKERS] FW: [CORE] create database bug Jan Wieck (Mon 25 18:27)
• postgres (zombie) Constantin Teodorescu (Mon 25 11:00)
• Re: [HACKERS] postgres (zombie) Tom Lane (Mon 25 15:38)
• Problem with 6.5 and tables >2Gb Peter T Mount (Mon 25 10:27)
• Another speedup idea (two, even) Tom Lane (Mon 25 01:06)
• Re: [HACKERS] Another speedup idea (two, even) Bruce Momjian (Mon 25 02:31)
• Re: [HACKERS] Another speedup idea (two, even) Tom Lane (Wed 27 21:45)
• Re: [HACKERS] Another speedup idea (two, even) Bruce Momjian (Wed 27 22:32)
• Odd behavior of type coercion for datetime Tom Lane (Sun 24 23:37)
• Re: Odd behavior of type coercion for datetime Thomas G. Lockhart (Mon 25 02:33)
• Foreign key parsing and inherited classes Oliver Elphick (Sun 24 20:37)
• Another source of snprintf/vsnprintf code Tom Lane (Sun 24 18:42)
• Re: [HACKERS] Another source of snprintf/vsnprintf code Todd Graham Lewis (Mon 25 07:25)
• Re: [HACKERS] Another source of snprintf/vsnprintf code Tom Lane (Mon 25 15:51)
• Re: [HACKERS] Another source of snprintf/vsnprintf code The Hermit Hacker (Mon 25 18:29)
• Q about heap_getattr Tom Lane (Sun 24 17:54)
• Re: [HACKERS] Q about heap_getattr Vadim Mikheev (Sun 24 18:09)
• Re: [HACKERS] Q about heap_getattr Tom Lane (Sun 24 18:32)
• Re: [HACKERS] Q about heap_getattr Bruce Momjian (Sun 24 19:01)
• Re: [HACKERS] Q about heap_getattr Tom Lane (Sun 24 20:06)
• Re: [HACKERS] Q about heap_getattr Bruce Momjian (Sun 24 21:00)
• [HACKERS] Adding some const keywords to external interfaces (fwd) The Hermit Hacker (Sun 24 08:13)
• cvsup RPMs available Thomas G. Lockhart (Sun 24 06:08)
• Re: datetime regress test busted by incomplete checkin Bruce Momjian (Sat 23 21:36)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: datetime regress test busted by incomplete checkin Oleg Broytmann (Mon 25 09:26)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: datetime regress test busted by incomplete checkin Bruce Momjian (Mon 25 15:24)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: datetime regress test busted by incomplete checkin Oleg Broytmann (Mon 25 15:38)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: datetime regress test busted by incomplete checkin Bruce Momjian (Mon 25 16:01)

---

• Main Index
• [Prev Page]
• [Next Page]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc