• Text Size: Normal / Large
• Donate
• Contact

Section Navigation

• Community
• Contributors
• Mailing Lists
  • Subscribe
  • User lists
  • Developer lists
    • pgsql-cluster-hackers
    • pgsql-committers
    • pgsql-hackers
    • pgsql-rrreviewers
    • pgsql-testers
    • pgsql-www
  • Regional lists
  • Associations
  • User groups
  • Project lists
  • Inactive lists
• IRC
• Featured Users
• International Sites
• Propaganda
• Resources
• Weekly News
• Community login
  • Profile
  • Lost password

pgsql-hackers 1999-01 Chronological Index (1/5)

• Thread Index
• [Prev Page]
• [Next Page]

• 01 February 1999
  • Re: [HACKERS] READ COMMITTED isolevel is implemented ... Vadim Mikheev (04:54)
  • Re: [HACKERS] READ COMMITTED isolevel is implemented ... Vadim Mikheev (03:05)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Reducing sema usage (was Postmaster dies with many child processes) Vadim Mikheev (02:45)
  • Table exists, but not accessible? Thomas Reinke (00:06)
• 31 January 1999
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: Reducing sema usage (was Postmaster dies with many child processes) Tom Lane (23:04)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: Reducing sema usage (was Postmaster dies with many child processes) Oliver Elphick (21:33)
  • Re: Problems with anon CVS? The Hermit Hacker (20:23)
  • Re: [HACKERS] nested loops in joins, ambiguous rewrite rules Bruce Momjian (19:36)
  • Re: [HACKERS] nested loops in joins, ambiguous rewrite rules Tom Lane (18:59)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Patches Bruce Momjian (18:39)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: Reducing sema usage (was Postmaster dies with many child processes) Tom Lane (18:01)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Patches Tom Lane (17:41)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: vacuumdb? Tom Lane (17:23)
  • Patch (was: tough locale bug) Goran Thyni (15:55)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Patches D'Arcy (13:20)
  • Re: [HACKERS] READ COMMITTED isolevel is implemented ... Tatsuo Ishii (09:22)
  • Re: [HACKERS] nested loops in joins, ambiguous rewrite rules Bruce Momjian (07:00)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Patches Bruce Momjian (06:00)
  • Re: [HACKERS] nested loops in joins, ambiguous rewrite rules Charles Hornberger (05:38)
  • Patches D'Arcy (03:42)
  • Re: [HACKERS] nested loops in joins, ambiguous rewrite rules Bruce Momjian (03:31)
  • Re: vacuumdb? D'Arcy (03:27)
  • Re: [HACKERS] nested loops in joins, ambiguous rewrite rules Charles Hornberger (02:35)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Reducing sema usage (was Postmaster dies with many child processes) Bruce Momjian (02:02)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: Reducing sema usage (was Postmaster dies with many child processes) Bruce Momjian (02:02)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Reducing sema usage (was Postmaster dies with many child processes) The Hermit Hacker (01:56)
  • Re: AW: [HACKERS] Another TEMP table trick Bruce Momjian (01:31)
  • Backends and semaphores Cary O'Brien (01:11)
  • Re: Reducing sema usage (was Postmaster dies with many child processes) Tom Lane (00:43)
  • Reducing sema usage (was Postmaster dies with many child processes) Tom Lane (00:12)
• 30 January 1999
  • Re: [HACKERS] nested loops in joins, ambiguous rewrite rules Tom Lane (21:08)
  • Re: [DOCS] Re: postgres v6.0 and pgsql-docs-digest V1 #401 The Hermit Hacker (20:37)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Postmaster dies with many child processes (spinlock/semget failed) Tom Lane (20:19)
  • Re: [HACKERS] new heap manager mmalloc Patrick Welche (15:08)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Postmaster dies with many child processes Cary O'Brien (14:09)
  • ERROR: heap_fetch: xinv19201 relation: ReadBuffer(81aeefe) failed Ian Grant (13:01)
  • ERROR: heap_fetch: xinv19073 relation: ReadBuffer(81aeefe) failed Ian Grant (12:49)
  • ERROR: heap_fetch: xinv19073 relation: ReadBuffer(81aeefe) failed Ian Grant (12:41)
  • Re: [HACKERS] READ COMMITTED isolevel is implemented ... Hannu Krosing (11:45)
  • Re: AW: [HACKERS] Another TEMP table trick Hannu Krosing (11:42)
  • Re: [HACKERS] READ COMMITTED isolevel is implemented ... Vadim Mikheev (11:12)
  • Re: [HACKERS] READ COMMITTED isolevel is implemented ... Vadim Mikheev (11:07)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Problems with anon CVS? Dr. Ernst Molitor (10:37)
  • Re: Visionary Michael Robinson (08:08)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Postmaster dies with many child processes (spinlock/semget failed) The Hermit Hacker (08:06)
  • Re: Visionary Michael Robinson (07:55)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof Bruce Momjian (06:32)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Visionary Bruce Momjian (06:31)
  • Re: [HACKERS] READ COMMITTED isolevel is implemented ... Bruce Momjian (06:31)
  • RE: [HACKERS] READ COMMITTED isolevel is implemented ... Hiroshi Inoue (06:27)
  • Re: AW: [HACKERS] Another TEMP table trick Bruce Momjian (05:30)
  • Re: [HACKERS] new heap manager mmalloc Bruce Momjian (05:30)
  • Re: [HACKERS] READ COMMITTED isolevel is implemented ... Vadim Mikheev (04:40)
  • Re: [GENERAL] nested loops in joins, ambiguous rewrite rules Charles Hornberger (04:20)
  • Re: [GENERAL] nested loops in joins, ambiguous rewrite rules Charles Hornberger (04:05)
  • Re: [GENERAL] nested loops in joins, ambiguous rewrite rules Charles Hornberger (02:09)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Postmaster dies with many child processes (spinlock/semget failed) Tatsuo Ishii (01:22)
  • RE: [HACKERS] READ COMMITTED isolevel is implemented ... Hiroshi Inoue (00:02)
• 29 January 1999
  • Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof Jan Wieck (22:09)
  • Problems with anon CVS? Keith Parks (22:05)
  • Visionary Dan Gowin (21:05)
  • License for PostgreSQL Contributions (Was: RE: DOM Implementation for C++) Clark Evans (20:18)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: SELECT DISTINCT ON ... ORDER BY ... Oliver Elphick (18:24)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Postmaster dies with many child processes (spinlock/semget failed) Tom Lane (18:15)
  • another ecpg patch Michael Meskes (18:13)
  • READ COMMITTED isolevel is implemented ... Vadim Mikheev (17:55)
  • Re: postgres v6.0 and pgsql-docs-digest V1 #401 Hannu Krosing (17:20)
  • Re: SELECT DISTINCT ON ... ORDER BY ... Tom Lane (17:04)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Postmaster dies with many child processes (spinlock/semget failed) Hannu Krosing (17:03)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof Tom Lane (16:21)
  • VACUUM ANALYZE failed on linux Oleg Broytmann (16:13)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Postmaster dies with many child processes (spinlock/semget failed) Patrick Verdon (16:05)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof Jan Wieck (14:15)
  • Re: [HACKERS] new heap manager mmalloc Jan Wieck (14:02)
  • AW: [HACKERS] Another TEMP table trick Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5 (08:38)
  • equal: don't know whether nodes of type 600 are equal Vadim Mikheev (07:07)
  • Re: [HACKERS] TEMP table code Bruce Momjian (07:00)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Postmaster dies with many child processes (spinlock/semget failed) Oleg Bartunov (06:41)
  • Re: [HACKERS] TEMP table code Thomas G. Lockhart (06:18)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Postmaster dies with many child processes (spinlock/semget failed) Vadim Mikheev (03:06)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Postmaster dies with many child processes (spinlock/semget failed) The Hermit Hacker (01:32)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Postmaster dies with many child processes (spinlock/semget failed) Tatsuo Ishii (01:10)
• 28 January 1999
  • Postmaster dies with many child processes (spinlock/semget failed) Patrick Verdon (23:51)
  • Postmaster dies with many child processes (spinlock/semget failed) Patrick Verdon (23:40)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Another TEMP table trick Bruce Momjian (23:32)
  • Another TEMP table trick Bruce Momjian (23:19)
  • tough locale bug Goran Thyni (21:48)
  • [Fwd: DBD::Pg::db do failed: pqReadData() Error] Edmund Mergl (21:48)
  • tough locale bug Goran Thyni (21:46)
  • TEMP table code Bruce Momjian (21:39)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Bug or feature? COPY ignores column defaults Tom Lane (20:06)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Bug or feature? COPY ignores column defaults Tom Lane (19:50)
  • RE: [HACKERS] Problem with multiple SUMs Jackson, DeJuan (19:45)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof Tom Lane (19:42)
  • Re: [HACKERS] new heap manager mmalloc Tom Lane (19:03)
  • Theory and practice of free software Tom Lane (18:44)
  • Re: [HACKERS] new heap manager mmalloc Bruce Momjian (18:02)
  • Using PostgreSQL in spite of ASE silvio_paiva (18:00)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Problem with multiple SUMs D'Arcy (17:23)
  • RE: [HACKERS] Problem with multiple SUMs Jackson, DeJuan (16:27)
  • Re: [HACKERS] new heap manager mmalloc Tom Lane (15:51)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Bug or feature? COPY ignores column defaults Tom Lane (15:43)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Bug or feature? COPY ignores column defaults Oliver Elphick (15:07)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Postgres Speed or lack thereof Massimo Dal Zotto (14:31)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Bug or feature? COPY ignores column defaults Jan Wieck (14:30)
  • (Fwd) Re: [ADMIN] Running Postgres on a HP-Ux 10.10 System Reiner Nippes (14:19)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Death! Oleg Broytmann (14:15)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Bug or feature? COPY ignores column defaults Vadim Mikheev (14:12)
  • Bug or feature? COPY ignores column defaults Oliver Elphick (13:28)
  • Re: [HACKERS] new heap manager mmalloc The Hermit Hacker (12:41)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Death! The Hermit Hacker (12:41)
  • Re: [HACKERS] PL/pgSQL and SPI Jan Wieck (12:24)
  • PL/pgSQL mixed case support Jan Wieck (11:54)
  • new heap manager mmalloc Ulrich Voss (11:05)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Death! Oleg Broytmann (10:12)
  • Testing... Marc G. Fournier (10:06)
  • Death! The Hermit Hacker (09:54)
  • Tsest .. The Hermit Hacker (09:52)
  • Test two... The Hermit Hacker (09:51)
  • a test Marc G. Fournier (09:51)
  • a test Marc G. Fournier (09:50)
  • a test Marc G. Fournier (09:47)
  • Re: [HACKERS] FOR UPDATE question Vadim Mikheev (08:22)
  • Another small ecpg bug fixed Michael Meskes (06:44)
  • FOR UPDATE question Michael Meskes (06:44)
  • Re: [HACKERS] NAN on FreeBSD 2.2.8 Vince Vielhaber (02:43)
  • Re: [HACKERS] NAN on FreeBSD 2.2.8 Bruce Momjian (02:02)
  • Re: [HACKERS] NAN on FreeBSD 2.2.8 Vince Vielhaber (01:48)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Problem with multiple SUMs D'Arcy (01:34)
  • Re: [HACKERS] NAN on FreeBSD 2.2.8 The Hermit Hacker (00:19)
• 27 January 1999
  • NAN on FreeBSD 2.2.8 Vince Vielhaber (23:45)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Another speedup idea (two, even) Bruce Momjian (22:32)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Another speedup idea (two, even) Tom Lane (21:45)
  • Re: [HACKERS] PL/pgSQL and SPI Vadim Mikheev (21:27)
  • Something wacko about EXPLAIN cost stats Tom Lane (20:19)
  • Re: [HACKERS] regression test HAVING fixed Vadim Mikheev (18:53)
  • Re: [HACKERS] PL/pgSQL and SPI Vadim Mikheev (18:44)
  • Re: [HACKERS] regression test HAVING fixed Tom Lane (18:36)
  • Re: [HACKERS] TEMP tables Bruce Momjian (18:00)
  • Re: [HACKERS] PL/pgSQL and SPI Jan Wieck (17:58)
  • Re: [HACKERS] PL/pgSQL and SPI Vadim Mikheev (17:43)
  • Re: [HACKERS] TEMP tables Vadim Mikheev (17:10)
  • PL/pgSQL and SPI Jan Wieck (17:01)
  • TEMP tables Bruce Momjian (17:00)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Problem with multiple SUMs Bruce Momjian (16:17)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: Non-blocking queries in postgresql Tom Lane (16:07)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Problem with multiple SUMs Bruce Momjian (16:00)
  • regression test HAVING fixed Bruce Momjian (16:00)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Problem with multiple SUMs Tom Lane (15:32)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Problem with multiple SUMs Bruce Momjian (14:30)
  • Re: Non-blocking queries in postgresql Bruce Momjian (14:30)
  • Problem with multiple SUMs D'Arcy (12:51)
  • MB big5 support patch (current) Tatsuo Ishii (07:23)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Major breakage? Vadim Mikheev (02:24)
  • Re: [PATCHES] mb support fix The Hermit Hacker (01:18)
  • mb support fix Tatsuo Ishii (00:59)
• 26 January 1999
  • Re: alloca (was: Postgres Speed or lack thereof) The Hermit Hacker (23:47)
  • Re: alloca (was: Postgres Speed or lack thereof) Goran Thyni (23:37)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Major breakage? Bruce Momjian (22:06)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Major breakage? Tom Lane (19:45)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: alloca (was: Postgres Speed or lack thereof) Tom Lane (19:05)
  • dump doesn't save views and blobs lorenzo (18:56)
  • Re: alloca (was: Postgres Speed or lack thereof) The Hermit Hacker (18:09)
  • Re: alloca (was: Postgres Speed or lack thereof) Goran Thyni (17:49)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: alloca (was: Postgres Speed or lack thereof) Goran Thyni (17:49)
  • Re: [HACKERS] MySQL vulnerability Goran Thyni (17:49)
  • Re: Non-blocking queries in postgresql Bruce Momjian (15:54)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Primary keys additional D'Arcy (14:14)
  • Primary keys additional D'Arcy (13:45)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Major breakage? Vadim Mikheev (13:06)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: datetime regress test busted by incomplete checkin Oleg Broytmann (13:00)
  • Major breakage? Tom Lane (06:56)
  • Re: [HACKERS] help bug and comment char. Thomas G. Lockhart (03:19)
  • Re: [HACKERS] handling 64bit time_t's Thomas G. Lockhart (03:10)
  • help bug and comment char. Terry Mackintosh (00:38)
• 25 January 1999
  • Re: [HACKERS] FW: [CORE] create database bug Tom Lane (23:45)
  • handling 64bit time_t's Adrian Gartland (19:48)
  • RE: [HACKERS] FW: [CORE] create database bug Dan Gowin (18:42)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: datetime regress test busted by incomplete checkin Bruce Momjian (18:31)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Another source of snprintf/vsnprintf code The Hermit Hacker (18:29)

• Thread Index
• [Prev Page]
• [Next Page]