• Text Size: Normal / Large
• Donate
• Contact

Section Navigation

• Community
• Contributors
• Mailing Lists
  • Subscribe
  • User lists
  • Developer lists
    • pgsql-cluster-hackers
    • pgsql-committers
    • pgsql-hackers
    • pgsql-rrreviewers
    • pgsql-testers
    • pgsql-www
  • Regional lists
  • Associations
  • User groups
  • Project lists
  • Inactive lists
• IRC
• Featured Users
• International Sites
• Propaganda
• Resources
• Weekly News
• Community login
  • Profile
  • Lost password

pgsql-hackers 1998-09 Thread Index (1/4)

• Main Index
• [Prev Page]
• [Next Page]

• backend crashes under 6.4beta Marcus Mascari (Wed 30 22:28)
• 6.4 beta crashed backend Marcus Mascari (Wed 30 17:26)
• RE: [HACKERS] Make error in current cvs. Jackson, DeJuan (Wed 30 16:47)
• [no subject] Sergio Brandano (Wed 30 16:18)
• Make error in current cvs. Jackson, DeJuan (Wed 30 16:08)
• Re: [HACKERS] Make error in current cvs. Jan Wieck (Wed 30 16:43)
• initdb question Joost Kraaijeveld (Wed 30 13:47)
• Windows NT port: what file are created by initdb? Joost Kraaijeveld (Wed 30 08:02)
• Patches for gram.y and keywords.c Thomas G. Lockhart (Wed 30 05:53)
• Re: [HACKERS] PL/pgSQL in template1? Keith Parks (Tue 29 21:34)
• RE: [HACKERS] SQL92 Jackson, DeJuan (Tue 29 17:01)
• Re: [HACKERS] SQL92 Thomas G. Lockhart (Wed 30 01:46)
• Re: [HACKERS] SQL92 Jose' Soares (Wed 30 12:09)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• RE: [HACKERS] SQL92 Jackson, DeJuan (Wed 30 15:28)
• RE: [HACKERS] SQL92 Jackson, DeJuan (Wed 30 15:46)
• SQL92 Jackson, DeJuan (Tue 29 14:51)
• Re: [HACKERS] SQL92 Thomas G. Lockhart (Tue 29 16:45)
• Re: Antwort: [HACKERS] ecpg parser Thomas G. Lockhart (Tue 29 12:55)
• Re: Antwort: [HACKERS] ecpg parser Michael Meskes (Wed 30 07:08)
• rules ON SELECT Jan Wieck (Tue 29 12:53)
• Patch - please apply Jan Wieck (Tue 29 10:03)
• Re: [HACKERS] Patch - please apply The Hermit Hacker (Tue 29 12:40)
• Re: [HACKERS] Patch - please apply Jan Wieck (Tue 29 13:02)
• Re: [HACKERS] Patch - please apply The Hermit Hacker (Thu 01 03:36)
• PL/pgSQL in template1? Jan Wieck (Tue 29 07:25)
• Re: [HACKERS] PL/pgSQL in template1? David Hartwig (Tue 29 16:49)
• Re: [HACKERS] PL/pgSQL in template1? Jan Wieck (Tue 29 17:14)
• ecpg parser Thomas G. Lockhart (Tue 29 05:28)
• pg_dump Thomas G. Lockhart (Tue 29 04:41)
• Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump Tom Lane (Tue 29 12:55)
• SGI Port of Postgresql 6.4 snapshot of 09/28/98 Robert Bruccoleri (Tue 29 03:32)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: SGI Port of Postgresql 6.4 snapshot of 09/28/98 Robert Bruccoleri (Tue 29 15:01)
• Fix for pg_views/pg_rules and new system views Jan Wieck (Mon 28 22:02)
• Little parser question Jan Wieck (Mon 28 16:52)
• Re: [HACKERS] Little parser question Thomas G. Lockhart (Tue 29 04:29)
• Proper cleanup at backend exit Tom Lane (Mon 28 14:28)
• Re: [HACKERS] Proper cleanup at backend exit Massimo Dal Zotto (Mon 28 17:04)
• Re: [HACKERS] Proper cleanup at backend exit Tom Lane (Mon 28 18:03)
• RE: [HACKERS] LIBPQ for WIN32 Magnus Hagander (Mon 28 08:31)
• RE: [HACKERS] LIBPQ for WIN32 Hiroshi Inoue (Mon 28 23:55)
• RE: [HACKERS] LIBPQ for WIN32 Vince Vielhaber (Tue 29 00:27)
• RE: [HACKERS] LIBPQ for WIN32 Hiroshi Inoue (Tue 29 01:43)
• RE: [HACKERS] LIBPQ for WIN32 Vince Vielhaber (Tue 29 10:09)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• RE: [HACKERS] LIBPQ for WIN32 Magnus Hagander (Tue 29 12:08)
• RE: [HACKERS] LIBPQ for WIN32 Taral (Tue 29 14:32)
• RE: [HACKERS] LIBPQ for WIN32 Magnus Hagander (Tue 29 12:25)
• rewrite rules patch Jan Wieck (Mon 28 07:59)
• LIBPQ for WIN32 Hiroshi Inoue (Mon 28 04:06)
• spinlock code for ns32k (again) Jon Buller (Mon 28 03:27)
• It sorta works, but I'm confused about locking Tom Lane (Sun 27 21:34)
• Re: [HACKERS] It sorta works, but I'm confused about locking Massimo Dal Zotto (Mon 28 16:51)
• Re: [HACKERS] It sorta works, but I'm confused about locking Tom Lane (Mon 28 18:09)
• Think we need major revisions in async.c... Tom Lane (Sun 27 01:05)
• Re: [HACKERS] Think we need major revisions in async.c... Bruce Momjian (Sun 27 05:41)
• Re: [HACKERS] Think we need major revisions in async.c... Massimo Dal Zotto (Mon 28 16:44)
• Re: [HACKERS] Think we need major revisions in async.c... Tom Lane (Mon 28 19:15)
• functional indexes Daniel Kalchev (Sat 26 09:54)
• How to destroy your entire Postgres installation Tom Lane (Fri 25 22:18)
• Re: [HACKERS] How to destroy your entire Postgres installation Nick Bastin (Fri 25 23:02)
• Re: [HACKERS] How to destroy your entire Postgres installation Tom Lane (Fri 25 23:36)
• RE: [PHP3] [OFF-TOPIC] POSTGRES Jackson, DeJuan (Fri 25 18:54)
• Installation instructions Thomas G. Lockhart (Fri 25 14:53)
• Re: [DOCS] Installation instructions Bruce Momjian (Fri 25 15:53)
• unfortunately... Vadim Mikheev (Fri 25 03:53)
• Re: [HACKERS] unfortunately... Thomas G. Lockhart (Fri 25 04:49)
• Re: [HACKERS] unfortunately... The Hermit Hacker (Fri 25 11:18)
• Re: [HACKERS] unfortunately... Bruce Momjian (Fri 25 15:48)
• Re: unfortunately... D'Arcy J.M. Cain (Fri 25 17:08)
• Can slock_t ever be unaligned? Tom Lane (Thu 24 18:26)
• configure... Matthew C. Aycock (Thu 24 14:56)
• [no subject] Theo Kramer (Thu 24 13:20)
• bug on CHAR_LENGTH function ? Jose' Soares (Thu 24 07:43)
• Re: [HACKERS] bug on CHAR_LENGTH function ? Thomas G. Lockhart (Thu 24 13:51)
• Yipes, I'm getting bit by duplicate tuples Tom Lane (Wed 23 21:04)
• Re: [HACKERS] Yipes, I'm getting bit by duplicate tuples Bruce Momjian (Wed 23 22:23)
• NOTIFY interlock broken (was Yipes, I'm getting bit by duplicate tuples) Tom Lane (Sat 26 21:18)
• Re: [HACKERS] NOTIFY interlock broken (was Yipes, I'm getting bit by duplicate tuples) Bruce Momjian (Sat 26 22:03)
• Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump, problem with user defined types? Keith Parks (Wed 23 21:01)
• Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump, problem with user defined types? Bruce Momjian (Wed 23 21:32)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump, problem with user defined types? Keith Parks (Wed 23 23:20)
• Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump, problem with user defined types? Bruce Momjian (Thu 24 02:11)
• Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump, problem with user defined types? Thomas G. Lockhart (Thu 24 06:08)
• fix for multi-byte partial truncating Tatsuo Ishii (Thu 24 09:20)
• Re: [HACKERS] fix for multi-byte partial truncating Bruce Momjian (Fri 25 01:47)
• Re: [HACKERS] fix for multi-byte partial truncating Tatsuo Ishii (Fri 25 09:04)
• Re: [HACKERS] fix for multi-byte partial truncating Bruce Momjian (Fri 25 15:51)
• Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump, problem with user defined types? Thomas G. Lockhart (Fri 25 02:33)
• Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump, problem with user defined types? Bruce Momjian (Fri 25 03:38)
• Problem on TODO list Michael Meskes (Wed 23 17:17)
• Re: [HACKERS] Problem on TODO list Bruce Momjian (Wed 23 17:48)
• Re: [HACKERS] Problem on TODO list Michael Meskes (Wed 23 18:18)
• Recursive Unions Michael Meskes (Wed 23 17:17)
• Re: [SQL] Question re: null Sferacarta Software (Wed 23 15:25)
• Re: [HACKERS] Transaction system (proposal for 6.5) rmiranda (Wed 23 14:45)
• default rights of new users maloune (Wed 23 14:28)
• Re: [SQL] 2 questions. Chris Johnson (Wed 23 12:54)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [SQL] 2 questions. Sferacarta Software (Wed 23 13:46)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] 2 questions. Thomas G. Lockhart (Thu 24 02:34)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] 2 questions. Jose' Soares (Thu 24 11:20)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] 2 questions. Thomas G. Lockhart (Thu 24 13:49)
• pg_dump, problem with user defined types? Keith Parks (Wed 23 10:11)
• Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump, problem with user defined types? Bruce Momjian (Wed 23 17:09)
• Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump, problem with user defined types? Thomas G. Lockhart (Thu 24 02:57)
• funny comment Bruce Momjian (Tue 22 21:46)
• Problem dropping databases Thomas G. Lockhart (Tue 22 13:49)
• Re: [HACKERS] Problem dropping databases Thomas G. Lockhart (Tue 22 16:20)
• Re: Problem dropping databases Bruce Momjian (Tue 22 20:01)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: Problem dropping databases Sferacarta Software (Thu 24 13:47)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: Problem dropping databases Thomas G. Lockhart (Thu 24 14:17)
• Message not available
  • Re: [HACKERS] Re: Problem dropping databases Thomas G. Lockhart (Fri 25 14:39)
• Re: [HACKERS] Errors inside transactions Andreas Zeugswetter (Tue 22 06:46)
• regress[ion].* files? Brook Milligan (Mon 21 20:42)
• Re: [HACKERS] regress[ion].* files? The Hermit Hacker (Tue 22 00:50)
• Re: [HACKERS] regress[ion].* files? Bruce Momjian (Tue 22 16:52)
• Foreign Keys: check_primary_function Anand Surelia (Mon 21 19:05)
• Re: [HACKERS] oid8types() borken? Bruce Momjian (Mon 21 15:42)
• [no subject] jkraai (Mon 21 15:07)
• [no subject] jkraai (Mon 21 15:05)
• Errors inside transactions Tom Lane (Mon 21 14:58)
• Re: [HACKERS] Errors inside transactions Thomas G. Lockhart (Mon 21 15:45)
• Re: [HACKERS] Errors inside transactions Tom Lane (Mon 21 16:47)
• Re: [HACKERS] query crashes backend - cvs Bruce Momjian (Mon 21 11:31)
• yet another query to crash the backend Tatsuo Ishii (Mon 21 03:32)
• Re: [HACKERS] yet another query to crash the backend Bruce Momjian (Mon 21 04:17)
• Re: [HACKERS] yet another query to crash the backend Tatsuo Ishii (Mon 21 04:31)
• Re: [HACKERS] query crashes backend - cvs (fwd) Oleg Bartunov (Mon 21 02:36)
• Version numbers (was Re: [PATCHES] Several libpgtcl fixes) Tom Lane (Mon 21 01:48)
• Re: [HACKERS] Version numbers (was Re: [PATCHES] Several libpgtcl fixes) Bruce Momjian (Mon 21 03:29)
• Re: [HACKERS] Version numbers (was Re: [PATCHES] Several libpgtcl fixes) The Hermit Hacker (Mon 21 06:07)
• current- crash Michael Reifenberger (Sun 20 18:51)
• Re: [HACKERS] current- crash Oleg Bartunov (Sun 20 19:37)
• Re: [HACKERS] current- crash Bruce Momjian (Mon 21 02:25)
• Re: [HACKERS] current- crash Jose' Soares (Tue 22 09:16)
• Re: [HACKERS] current- crash Bruce Momjian (Tue 22 20:02)
• Re: [HACKERS] current- crash Michael Reifenberger (Tue 22 21:24)
• Re: [HACKERS] current- crash Bruce Momjian (Tue 22 22:01)
• datetime questions and fix to dt.c Tatsuo Ishii (Wed 23 07:56)
• Re: [HACKERS] datetime questions and fix to dt.c Bruce Momjian (Wed 23 17:52)
• BSDI 2.1, postgresql-6.3.2 HELP!!! Christopher Akritides (Sun 20 17:23)
• Re: [HACKERS] Indixing problems... (fwd) Michael Reifenberger (Sun 20 11:33)
• SQL Triggers D'Arcy J.M. Cain (Sun 20 04:45)
• Re: [HACKERS] SQL Triggers Jan Wieck (Thu 24 08:56)
• Re: [HACKERS] SQL Triggers David Hartwig (Thu 24 15:12)
• PL/pgSQL Makefile (was: Re: [HACKERS] SQL Triggers) Jan Wieck (Fri 25 07:08)
• Re: PL/pgSQL Makefile (was: Re: [HACKERS] SQL Triggers) Bruce Momjian (Fri 25 15:50)
• Re: [HACKERS] SQL Triggers D'Arcy J.M. Cain (Fri 25 17:01)
• Re: [HACKERS] SQL Triggers Jan Wieck (Fri 25 17:48)
• UnixWare 7 vacuum failures on the regression database. Billy G. Allie (Sun 20 04:38)
• Results of port of Sept 18 port of PostgreSQL Robert Bruccoleri (Sun 20 03:50)
• Re: Results of port of Sept 18 port of PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian (Mon 21 02:25)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: Results of port of Sept 18 port of PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian (Tue 22 16:42)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: Results of port of Sept 18 port of PostgreSQL The Hermit Hacker (Wed 23 01:48)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: Results of port of Sept 18 port of PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian (Wed 23 02:34)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: Results of port of Sept 18 port of PostgreSQL The Hermit Hacker (Wed 23 03:13)
• RE: [HACKERS] Re: Results of port of Sept 18 port of PostgreSQL Taral (Thu 24 01:13)
• Regression results from HPUX 9/PA-RISC Tom Lane (Sun 20 01:58)
• My patches Michael Meskes (Sat 19 14:26)
• Re: My patches The Hermit Hacker (Mon 21 05:55)
• Windows NT port of Postgres Joost Kraaijeveld (Sat 19 12:17)
• Re: [HACKERS] Windows NT port of Postgres Thomas G. Lockhart (Mon 21 00:25)
• Re: [HACKERS] Windows NT port of Postgres Bruce Momjian (Mon 21 02:25)
• select not b from t1 -- electric fence Taral (Sat 19 05:14)
• Re: [HACKERS] select not b from t1 -- electric fence Bruce Momjian (Tue 22 21:46)
• Serial Data Type Failure David Hartwig (Fri 18 18:10)
• Re: Serial Data Type Failure Thomas G. Lockhart (Mon 21 00:49)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: Serial Data Type Failure Thomas G. Lockhart (Mon 21 05:40)
• [sferac(at)bo(dot)nettuno(dot)it: Re: [HACKERS] BUG: NOT boolfield kills backend] Christopher Oliver (Fri 18 18:02)
• Re: [sferac(at)bo(dot)nettuno(dot)it: Re: [HACKERS] BUG: NOT boolfield kills backend] J. Michael Roberts (Fri 18 19:58)
• Re: [sferac(at)bo(dot)nettuno(dot)it: Re: [HACKERS] BUG: NOT boolfield kills backend] Bruce Momjian (Fri 18 20:57)
• Re: [sferac(at)bo(dot)nettuno(dot)it: Re: [HACKERS] BUG: NOT boolfield kills backend] Thomas G. Lockhart (Mon 21 00:19)
• Re: [sferac(at)bo(dot)nettuno(dot)it: Re: [HACKERS] BUG: NOT boolfield kills backend] Christopher Oliver (Mon 21 00:54)
• Re: [sferac(at)bo(dot)nettuno(dot)it: Re: [HACKERS] BUG: NOT boolfield kills backend] Bruce Momjian (Mon 21 02:27)
• Re: [sferac(at)bo(dot)nettuno(dot)it: Re: [HACKERS] BUG: NOT boolfield kills backend] Christopher Oliver (Mon 21 05:39)
• Re: [sferac(at)bo(dot)nettuno(dot)it: Re: [HACKERS] BUG: NOT boolfield kills backend] Oleg Bartunov (Mon 21 06:42)
• Re: [sferac(at)bo(dot)nettuno(dot)it: Re: [HACKERS] BUG: NOT boolfield kills backend] Bruce Momjian (Mon 21 11:07)
• Re: [sferac(at)bo(dot)nettuno(dot)it: Re: [HACKERS] BUG: NOT boolfield kills backend] The Hermit Hacker (Tue 22 00:54)
• Re: [sferac(at)bo(dot)nettuno(dot)it: Re: [HACKERS] BUG: NOT boolfield kills backend] Thomas G. Lockhart (Mon 21 16:39)
• Re: [sferac(at)bo(dot)nettuno(dot)it: Re: [HACKERS] BUG: NOT boolfield kills backend] The Hermit Hacker (Tue 22 00:56)
• Re: [sferac(at)bo(dot)nettuno(dot)it: Re: [HACKERS] BUG: NOT boolfield kills backend] Bruce Momjian (Mon 21 11:08)
• Re: [sferac(at)bo(dot)nettuno(dot)it: Re: [HACKERS] BUG: NOT boolfield kills backend] J. Michael Roberts (Mon 21 16:22)

---

• Main Index
• [Prev Page]
• [Next Page]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc