Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
667 messages
30 September 1998
6.4 beta crashed backend Marcus Mascari (17:26)
RE: [HACKERS] Make error in current cvs. Jackson, DeJuan (16:47)
Re: [HACKERS] Make error in current cvs. Jan Wieck (16:43)
[no subject] Sergio Brandano (16:18)
Make error in current cvs. Jackson, DeJuan (16:08)
RE: [HACKERS] SQL92 Jackson, DeJuan (15:46)
RE: [HACKERS] SQL92 Jackson, DeJuan (15:28)
initdb question Joost Kraaijeveld (13:47)
Re: [HACKERS] SQL92 Jose' Soares (12:09)
Windows NT port: what file are created by initdb? Joost Kraaijeveld (08:02)
Re: Antwort: [HACKERS] ecpg parser Michael Meskes (07:08)
Patches for gram.y and keywords.c Thomas G. Lockhart (05:53)
Re: [HACKERS] SQL92 Thomas G. Lockhart (01:46)
29 September 1998
Re: [HACKERS] PL/pgSQL in template1? Jan Wieck (17:14)
RE: [HACKERS] SQL92 Jackson, DeJuan (17:01)
Re: [HACKERS] PL/pgSQL in template1? David Hartwig (16:49)
Re: [HACKERS] SQL92 Thomas G. Lockhart (16:45)
Re: SGI Port of Postgresql 6.4 snapshot of 09/28/98 Robert Bruccoleri (15:01)
SQL92 Jackson, DeJuan (14:51)
RE: [HACKERS] LIBPQ for WIN32 Taral (14:32)
Re: [HACKERS] Patch - please apply Jan Wieck (13:02)
Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump Tom Lane (12:55)
Re: Antwort: [HACKERS] ecpg parser Thomas G. Lockhart (12:55)
rules ON SELECT Jan Wieck (12:53)
Re: [HACKERS] Patch - please apply The Hermit Hacker (12:40)
RE: [HACKERS] LIBPQ for WIN32 Magnus Hagander (12:25)
RE: [HACKERS] LIBPQ for WIN32 Magnus Hagander (12:08)
RE: [HACKERS] LIBPQ for WIN32 Vince Vielhaber (10:09)
Patch - please apply Jan Wieck (10:03)
PL/pgSQL in template1? Jan Wieck (07:25)
ecpg parser Thomas G. Lockhart (05:28)
pg_dump Thomas G. Lockhart (04:41)
Re: [HACKERS] Little parser question Thomas G. Lockhart (04:29)
SGI Port of Postgresql 6.4 snapshot of 09/28/98 Robert Bruccoleri (03:32)
RE: [HACKERS] LIBPQ for WIN32 Hiroshi Inoue (01:43)
RE: [HACKERS] LIBPQ for WIN32 Vince Vielhaber (00:27)
28 September 1998
Fix for pg_views/pg_rules and new system views Jan Wieck (22:02)
Re: [HACKERS] Think we need major revisions in async.c... Tom Lane (19:15)
Re: [HACKERS] It sorta works, but I'm confused about locking Tom Lane (18:09)
Re: [HACKERS] Proper cleanup at backend exit Tom Lane (18:03)
Re: [HACKERS] Proper cleanup at backend exit Massimo Dal Zotto (17:04)
Little parser question Jan Wieck (16:52)
Re: [HACKERS] It sorta works, but I'm confused about locking Massimo Dal Zotto (16:51)
Re: [HACKERS] Think we need major revisions in async.c... Massimo Dal Zotto (16:44)
Proper cleanup at backend exit Tom Lane (14:28)
RE: [HACKERS] LIBPQ for WIN32 Magnus Hagander (08:31)
rewrite rules patch Jan Wieck (07:59)
subscribe Stan Thomas (06:13)
LIBPQ for WIN32 Hiroshi Inoue (04:06)
spinlock code for ns32k (again) Jon Buller (03:27)
27 September 1998
Re: [HACKERS] Think we need major revisions in async.c... Bruce Momjian (05:41)
Think we need major revisions in async.c... Tom Lane (01:05)
26 September 1998
NOTIFY interlock broken (was Yipes, I'm getting bit by duplicate tuples) Tom Lane (21:18)
functional indexes Daniel Kalchev (09:54)
25 September 1998
Re: [HACKERS] How to destroy your entire Postgres installation Nick Bastin (23:02)
How to destroy your entire Postgres installation Tom Lane (22:18)
RE: [PHP3] [OFF-TOPIC] POSTGRES Jackson, DeJuan (18:54)
Re: [HACKERS] SQL Triggers Jan Wieck (17:48)
Re: unfortunately... D'Arcy J.M. Cain (17:08)
Re: [HACKERS] SQL Triggers D'Arcy J.M. Cain (17:01)
Re: [DOCS] Installation instructions Bruce Momjian (15:53)
Re: [HACKERS] fix for multi-byte partial truncating Bruce Momjian (15:51)
Re: PL/pgSQL Makefile (was: Re: [HACKERS] SQL Triggers) Bruce Momjian (15:50)
Re: [HACKERS] unfortunately... Bruce Momjian (15:48)
Installation instructions Thomas G. Lockhart (14:53)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Problem dropping databases Thomas G. Lockhart (14:39)
Re: [HACKERS] unfortunately... The Hermit Hacker (11:18)
Re: [HACKERS] crash on new system views Jan Wieck (09:30)
Re: [HACKERS] fix for multi-byte partial truncating Tatsuo Ishii (09:04)
PL/pgSQL Makefile (was: Re: [HACKERS] SQL Triggers) Jan Wieck (07:08)
Re: [HACKERS] unfortunately... Thomas G. Lockhart (04:49)
unfortunately... Vadim Mikheev (03:53)
Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump, problem with user defined types? Bruce Momjian (03:38)
Re: [HACKERS] Transaction system (proposal for 6.5) Vadim Mikheev (02:43)
Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump, problem with user defined types? Thomas G. Lockhart (02:33)
Re: [HACKERS] fix for multi-byte partial truncating Bruce Momjian (01:47)
24 September 1998
Re: [HACKERS] SQL Triggers David Hartwig (15:12)
configure... Matthew C. Aycock (14:56)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Problem dropping databases Thomas G. Lockhart (14:17)
Re: [HACKERS] bug on CHAR_LENGTH function ? Thomas G. Lockhart (13:51)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] 2 questions. Thomas G. Lockhart (13:49)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Problem dropping databases Sferacarta Software (13:47)
[no subject] Theo Kramer (13:20)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] 2 questions. Jose' Soares (11:20)
fix for multi-byte partial truncating Tatsuo Ishii (09:20)
Re: [HACKERS] SQL Triggers Jan Wieck (08:56)
bug on CHAR_LENGTH function ? Jose' Soares (07:43)
Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump, problem with user defined types? Thomas G. Lockhart (06:08)
Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump, problem with user defined types? Thomas G. Lockhart (02:57)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] 2 questions. Thomas G. Lockhart (02:34)
Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump, problem with user defined types? Bruce Momjian (02:11)
RE: [HACKERS] Re: Results of port of Sept 18 port of PostgreSQL Taral (01:13)
23 September 1998
Re: [HACKERS] Yipes, I'm getting bit by duplicate tuples Bruce Momjian (22:23)
Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump, problem with user defined types? Bruce Momjian (21:32)
Yipes, I'm getting bit by duplicate tuples Tom Lane (21:04)
Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump, problem with user defined types? Keith Parks (21:01)
Re: [HACKERS] Problem on TODO list Michael Meskes (18:18)
Re: [HACKERS] datetime questions and fix to dt.c Bruce Momjian (17:52)
Re: [HACKERS] Problem on TODO list Bruce Momjian (17:48)
Problem on TODO list Michael Meskes (17:17)
Recursive Unions Michael Meskes (17:17)
Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump, problem with user defined types? Bruce Momjian (17:09)
Re: [SQL] Question re: null Sferacarta Software (15:25)
Re: [HACKERS] Transaction system (proposal for 6.5) rmiranda (14:45)
default rights of new users maloune (14:28)
Re: [SQL] 2 questions. Sferacarta Software (13:46)
Re: [SQL] 2 questions. Chris Johnson (12:54)
pg_dump, problem with user defined types? Keith Parks (10:11)
datetime questions and fix to dt.c Tatsuo Ishii (07:56)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Results of port of Sept 18 port of PostgreSQL The Hermit Hacker (03:13)
Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 Items Nick Bastin (03:03)
Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 Items Bruce Momjian (02:34)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Results of port of Sept 18 port of PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian (02:34)
Re: [HACKERS] Open 6.4 Items Nick Bastin (02:20)
Re: NOT boolfield kills backend Bruce Momjian (02:00)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Results of port of Sept 18 port of PostgreSQL The Hermit Hacker (01:48)
Re: NOT boolfield kills backend Thomas G. Lockhart (01:30)
22 September 1998
Re: NOT boolfield kills backend Bruce Momjian (21:46)
funny comment Bruce Momjian (21:46)
Re: [HACKERS] BUG: NOT boolfield kills backend Bruce Momjian (21:46)
Re: [HACKERS] select not b from t1 -- electric fence Bruce Momjian (21:46)
Re: [HACKERS] current- crash Michael Reifenberger (21:24)
Re: [HACKERS] current- crash Bruce Momjian (20:02)
Re: Problem dropping databases Bruce Momjian (20:01)
Re: [HACKERS] oid8types() borken? Bruce Momjian (20:01)
Re: NOT boolfield kills backend Bruce Momjian (19:31)
Re: [HACKERS] union regression test Bruce Momjian (16:53)
Re: [HACKERS] regress[ion].* files? Bruce Momjian (16:52)
Re: Results of port of Sept 18 port of PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian (16:42)
Re: [HACKERS] Problem dropping databases Thomas G. Lockhart (16:20)
Re: [HACKERS] oid8types() borken? Tatsuo Ishii (16:02)
Problem dropping databases Thomas G. Lockhart (13:49)
Re: [HACKERS] current- crash Jose' Soares (09:16)
Re: [HACKERS] Errors inside transactions Andreas Zeugswetter (06:46)
Re: [sferac(at)bo(dot)nettuno(dot)it: Re: [HACKERS] BUG: NOT boolfield kills backend] Bruce Momjian (05:02)
Re: NOT boolfield kills backend Thomas G. Lockhart (03:55)
Re: [sferac(at)bo(dot)nettuno(dot)it: Re: [HACKERS] BUG: NOT boolfield kills backend] The Hermit Hacker (00:56)
Re: [sferac(at)bo(dot)nettuno(dot)it: Re: [HACKERS] BUG: NOT boolfield kills backend] The Hermit Hacker (00:54)
Re: [HACKERS] regress[ion].* files? The Hermit Hacker (00:50)
21 September 1998
regress[ion].* files? Brook Milligan (20:42)
Re: [HACKERS] union regression test Brook Milligan (20:37)
Foreign Keys: check_primary_function Anand Surelia (19:05)
Re: [sferac(at)bo(dot)nettuno(dot)it: Re: [HACKERS] BUG: NOT boolfield kills backend] Thomas G. Lockhart (17:43)
Re: [sferac(at)bo(dot)nettuno(dot)it: Re: [HACKERS] BUG: NOT boolfield kills backend] Thomas G. Lockhart (17:04)
Re: [HACKERS] Errors inside transactions Tom Lane (16:47)
Re: [sferac(at)bo(dot)nettuno(dot)it: Re: [HACKERS] BUG: NOT boolfield kills backend] Thomas G. Lockhart (16:39)
Re: [sferac(at)bo(dot)nettuno(dot)it: Re: [HACKERS] BUG: NOT boolfield kills backend] J. Michael Roberts (16:22)
Re: [HACKERS] union regression test Brook Milligan (16:22)
Re: [HACKERS] Transaction system (proposal for 6.5) Michael Graff (15:55)
Re: [HACKERS] Errors inside transactions Thomas G. Lockhart (15:45)
Re: [HACKERS] oid8types() borken? Bruce Momjian (15:42)
Re: [HACKERS] union regression test Thomas G. Lockhart (15:33)
Re: [HACKERS] union regression test Brook Milligan (15:07)
[no subject] jkraai (15:07)
[no subject] jkraai (15:05)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: NOTICE: _outNode: don't know how to print type 715 Jose' Soares (15:04)
Errors inside transactions Tom Lane (14:58)
Re: [sferac(at)bo(dot)nettuno(dot)it: Re: [HACKERS] BUG: NOT boolfield kills backend] Bruce Momjian (12:37)
Re: [HACKERS] query crashes backend - cvs Bruce Momjian (11:31)
Re: [sferac(at)bo(dot)nettuno(dot)it: Re: [HACKERS] BUG: NOT boolfield kills backend] Bruce Momjian (11:08)
Re: [sferac(at)bo(dot)nettuno(dot)it: Re: [HACKERS] BUG: NOT boolfield kills backend] Bruce Momjian (11:07)
Re: [sferac(at)bo(dot)nettuno(dot)it: Re: [HACKERS] BUG: NOT boolfield kills backend] Oleg Bartunov (06:42)
Re: [HACKERS] Version numbers (was Re: [PATCHES] Several libpgtcl fixes) The Hermit Hacker (06:07)
Re: [HACKERS] Transaction system (proposal for 6.5) The Hermit Hacker (06:03)
Re: My patches The Hermit Hacker (05:55)
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Serial Data Type Failure Thomas G. Lockhart (05:40)
Re: [sferac(at)bo(dot)nettuno(dot)it: Re: [HACKERS] BUG: NOT boolfield kills backend] Christopher Oliver (05:39)
Re: [sferac(at)bo(dot)nettuno(dot)it: Re: [HACKERS] BUG: NOT boolfield kills backend] Thomas G. Lockhart (05:10)
Re: [HACKERS] yet another query to crash the backend Tatsuo Ishii (04:31)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
pgsql-hackers 1998-09 Chronological Index (1/4)
Last updated: Wed Jan 18 03:39:43 2012667 messages
- Thread Index
- [Prev Page]
- [Next Page]
- 01 October 1998
- Re: [HACKERS] Patch - please apply The Hermit Hacker (03:36)
- backend crashes under 6.4beta Marcus Mascari (22:28)
- Re: [HACKERS] PL/pgSQL in template1? Keith Parks (21:34)
- RE: [HACKERS] LIBPQ for WIN32 Hiroshi Inoue (23:55)
- It sorta works, but I'm confused about locking Tom Lane (21:34)
- Re: [HACKERS] NOTIFY interlock broken (was Yipes, I'm getting bit by duplicate tuples) Bruce Momjian (22:03)
- Re: [HACKERS] How to destroy your entire Postgres installation Tom Lane (23:36)
- Can slock_t ever be unaligned? Tom Lane (18:26)
- Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump, problem with user defined types? Keith Parks (23:20)
- Re: [HACKERS] current- crash Bruce Momjian (22:01)
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] Odbc parser error Herouth Maoz (23:40)
- Thread Index
- [Prev Page]
- [Next Page]