• Text Size: Normal / Large
• Donate
• Contact

Section Navigation

• Community
• Contributors
• Mailing Lists
  • Subscribe
  • User lists
  • Developer lists
    • pgsql-cluster-hackers
    • pgsql-committers
    • pgsql-hackers
    • pgsql-rrreviewers
    • pgsql-testers
    • pgsql-www
  • Regional lists
  • Associations
  • User groups
  • Project lists
  • Inactive lists
• IRC
• Featured Users
• International Sites
• Propaganda
• Resources
• Weekly News
• Community login
  • Profile
  • Lost password

pgsql-hackers 1997-03 Thread Index (1/3)

• Main Index
• [Prev Page]
• [Next Page]

• [HACKERS] Re: postgres The Hermit Hacker (Mon 31 21:16)
• [HACKERS] Getting number of modified records? David Wetzel (Mon 31 18:31)
• [HACKERS] Holdlock? David Wetzel (Mon 31 18:26)
• [HACKERS] Documentation on client protocol adrian (Mon 31 14:22)
• [HACKERS] backend terminated A. R. Van Hook D/834 ext 3531 (Mon 31 11:39)
• [HACKERS] Are there Postgres veterans? Gunther Schadow (Sun 30 12:34)
• [HACKERS] 6.1b: ipc stuff doesn't compiles under Linux Oleg Bartunov (Sun 30 12:05)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] 6.1b: ipc stuff doesn't compiles under Linux Thomas Lockhart (Mon 31 17:22)
• [HACKERS] Incrementing time D'Arcy J.M. Cain (Sat 29 15:53)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] Incrementing time Thomas Lockhart (Sun 30 15:45)
• Re: [HACKERS] Incrementing time Thomas Lockhart (Sun 30 16:01)
• [HACKERS] cursors and transactions Edmund Mergl (Sat 29 08:00)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] cursors and transactions Maarten Boekhold (Sat 29 09:53)
• Re: [HACKERS] cursors and transactions Edmund Mergl (Sat 29 22:33)
• [HACKERS] Linux USE_POSIX_SIGNALS typo Dan McGuirk (Fri 28 22:31)
• [HACKERS] Decimal types D'Arcy J.M. Cain (Fri 28 21:49)
• [HACKERS] Little bug... Gabriel Akos (Fri 28 08:27)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] Little bug... The Hermit Hacker (Fri 28 09:44)
• Re: [HACKERS] Little bug... D'Arcy J.M. Cain (Fri 28 13:46)
• Re: [HACKERS] Little bug... The Hermit Hacker (Fri 28 19:06)
• Re: [HACKERS] Little bug... darcy (Fri 28 20:42)
• Re: [HACKERS] Little bug... Thomas Lockhart (Fri 28 21:07)
• Re: [HACKERS] Configuring under NetBSD (from sup'd source) The Hermit Hacker (Fri 28 07:13)
• [HACKERS] FreeBSD execution traces Derek Glidden (Thu 27 23:38)
• [HACKERS] Duplicate postings Henry B. Hotz (Thu 27 21:26)
• [HACKERS] FreeBSD performance "problems" Derek Glidden (Thu 27 20:14)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] FreeBSD performance "problems" Henry B. Hotz (Thu 27 20:52)
• [HACKERS] configure and Linux Thomas Lockhart (Thu 27 18:05)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] configure and Linux The Hermit Hacker (Thu 27 20:14)
• Re: [HACKERS] Porting PostgreSQL to the damned M*soft Windows David Friend (Thu 27 17:29)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] Porting PostgreSQL to the damned M*soft Windows James Hughes (Thu 27 17:46)
• Re: [HACKERS] Porting PostgreSQL to the damned M*soft Windows James A. Hillyerd (Sun 30 02:16)
• Re: [HACKERS] abstime "now" broken Thomas Lockhart (Thu 27 15:58)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] abstime "now" broken The Hermit Hacker (Fri 28 07:09)
• [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] Porting PostgreSQL to the damned M*soft Windows Bruce Momjian (Thu 27 15:29)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] Porting PostgreSQL to the damned M*soft Windows The Hermit Hacker (Thu 27 20:12)
• [HACKERS] FreeBSD performance Derek Glidden (Thu 27 15:09)
• [HACKERS] Just to inform You Vadim B. Mikheev (Thu 27 09:11)
• [HACKERS] Insert performance on FreeBSD Derek Glidden (Thu 27 01:06)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] Insert performance on FreeBSD The Hermit Hacker (Thu 27 01:28)
• Re: [HACKERS] Insert performance on FreeBSD Bruce Momjian (Thu 27 01:39)
• [HACKERS] Is GEQO turned on in 6.1? Colin Kabaara (Thu 27 00:37)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] Is GEQO turned on in 6.1? The Hermit Hacker (Thu 27 00:56)
• [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] Insert performance. The Hermit Hacker (Wed 26 23:58)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] Insert performance. HANNU (Thu 27 00:07)
• [HACKERS] Err, what I meant to say was... Dan McGuirk (Wed 26 23:24)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] Err, what I meant to say was... The Hermit Hacker (Fri 28 07:02)
• Re: [HACKERS] Err, what I meant to say was... Dan McGuirk (Fri 28 11:59)
• Re: [HACKERS] Err, what I meant to say was... The Hermit Hacker (Fri 28 19:08)
• [HACKERS] Oops: tmin writeback patch fix. Dan McGuirk (Wed 26 23:20)
• [HACKERS] More fun with abstime Dan McGuirk (Wed 26 22:48)
• [HACKERS] abstime 'now' broken Dan McGuirk (Wed 26 22:43)
• [HACKERS] Time changes Dan McGuirk (Wed 26 22:38)
• [HACKERS] How to do an explicit CAST ?? Yann Courties (Wed 26 17:55)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] How to do an explicit CAST ?? Bruce Momjian (Wed 26 18:11)
• [HACKERS] backend/libpq/password.c D'Arcy J.M. Cain (Wed 26 15:59)
• [HACKERS] backend/utils/error/exc.c D'Arcy J.M. Cain (Wed 26 15:58)
• [HACKERS] backend/utils/adt/dt.c D'Arcy J.M. Cain (Wed 26 15:55)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] backend/utils/adt/dt.c The Hermit Hacker (Fri 28 06:53)
• [HACKERS] Small date patches (resubmitted) Thomas Lockhart (Wed 26 15:00)
• [HACKERS] 6.1/sparc-solaris 2.5: NAN undefined? Colin Kabaara (Wed 26 13:04)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] 6.1/sparc-solaris 2.5: NAN undefined? Colin Kabaara (Wed 26 13:33)
• Re: [HACKERS] 6.1/sparc-solaris 2.5: NAN undefined? The Hermit Hacker (Wed 26 16:42)
• Re: [HACKERS] 6.1/sparc-solaris 2.5: NAN undefined? Colin Kabaara (Thu 27 00:52)
• [HACKERS] parser supports mci creation now Vadim B. Mikheev (Wed 26 03:35)
• [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] Re: [PG95]: ignore "compile errors" :) Thomas Lockhart (Wed 26 00:56)
• [HACKERS] question about perl interface to the Postgres95 nyang (Tue 25 20:48)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] question about perl interface to the Postgres95 The Hermit Hacker (Tue 25 21:04)
• Re: [HACKERS] question about perl interface to the Postgres95 The Hermit Hacker (Tue 25 21:04)
• Re: [HACKERS] question about perl interface to the Postgres95 nyang (Tue 25 21:42)
• Re: [HACKERS] question about perl interface to the Postgres95 James Hughes (Tue 25 21:52)
• Re: [HACKERS] question about perl interface to the Postgres95 D'Arcy J.M. Cain (Tue 25 21:56)
• Re: [HACKERS] question about perl interface to the Postgres95 rasmus (Tue 25 22:03)
• Re: [HACKERS] question about perl interface to the Postgres95 Edmund Mergl (Tue 25 22:40)
• Re: [HACKERS] question about perl interface to the Postgres95 The Hermit Hacker (Wed 26 01:46)
• [HACKERS] C/C++ Users Journal links to PostgreSql. Darren King (Tue 25 20:14)
• [HACKERS] Re[2]: [QUESTIONS] Stored procedures alternatives lsh (Tue 25 17:55)
• [HACKERS] tmin writeback optimization Dan McGuirk (Tue 25 17:22)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] tmin writeback optimization The Hermit Hacker (Fri 28 07:03)
• [HACKERS] Stored procedures alternatives lsh (Tue 25 17:13)
• [HACKERS] about one strange things in "update" behavior. Maxim Kozin (Tue 25 16:22)
• [HACKERS] Date formats in backend/utils/adt/datetime.c D'Arcy J.M. Cain (Tue 25 15:43)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] Date formats in backend/utils/adt/datetime.c Christopher Hicks (Tue 25 19:20)
• Re: [HACKERS] Date formats in backend/utils/adt/datetime.c Kurt J. Lidl (Wed 26 05:53)
• Re: [HACKERS] Date formats in backend/utils/adt/datetime.c The Hermit Hacker (Fri 28 07:18)
• Re: [HACKERS] Date formats in backend/utils/adt/datetime.c Vadim B. Mikheev (Fri 28 07:43)
• Re: [HACKERS] Date formats in backend/utils/adt/datetime.c Thomas Lockhart (Fri 28 22:30)
• [HACKERS] Various cleanups D'Arcy J.M. Cain (Tue 25 15:28)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] Various cleanups The Hermit Hacker (Fri 28 07:17)
• [none] Martin J. Laubach (Tue 25 14:43)
• [HACKERS] Small datetime patches Thomas Lockhart (Tue 25 14:25)
• [HACKERS] [Question] POSTGRES MAX USER limit ? swjeong (Tue 25 11:26)
• [HACKERS] [Question] POSTGRES MAX USER Configuration swjeong (Tue 25 11:26)
• [HACKERS] TWO table with EQUAL name simultaneously exists. Maxim Kozin (Tue 25 08:27)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [HACKERS] TWO table with EQUAL name simultaneously exists. Maxim Kozin (Tue 25 09:02)
• Re: [HACKERS] TWO table with EQUAL name simultaneously exists. The Hermit Hacker (Tue 25 09:04)
• Re: [HACKERS] TWO table with EQUAL name simultaneously exists. Maxim Kozin (Tue 25 09:12)
• Re: [HACKERS] TWO table with EQUAL name simultaneously exists. Vadim B. Mikheev (Tue 25 09:33)
• Re: [HACKERS] TWO table with EQUAL name simultaneously exists. Vadim B. Mikheev (Tue 25 10:03)
• [HACKERS] More patches for date/time Thomas Lockhart (Tue 25 07:05)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] More patches for date/time The Hermit Hacker (Tue 25 08:06)
• [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] possible buffer porblems Vadim B. Mikheev (Tue 25 04:05)
• [HACKERS] Warning message patch Thomas Lockhart (Tue 25 03:21)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] Warning message patch Vadim B. Mikheev (Tue 25 03:55)
• Re: [HACKERS] Warning message patch Dan McGuirk (Tue 25 21:22)
• [HACKERS] Program FlowChart Noah Chanin (Tue 25 02:23)
• [HACKERS] Re: Linux and POSIX signals Chris Dunlop (Tue 25 01:56)
• [HACKERS] Linux and POSIX signals Dan McGuirk (Mon 24 20:12)
• [HACKERS] auth.c fixed Dan McGuirk (Mon 24 19:29)
• [HACKERS] auth.c broken Dan McGuirk (Mon 24 19:22)
• [HACKERS] bug report receieved? Brett McCormick (Mon 24 18:53)
• Re: [HACKERS] date/time data type (formerly include/utils/dt.h) Thomas Lockhart (Mon 24 18:17)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] date/time data type (formerly include/utils/dt.h) Michael P. Snyder (Mon 24 20:01)
• Re: [HACKERS] date/time data type (formerly include/utils/dt.h) Thomas Lockhart (Mon 24 20:42)
• Re: [HACKERS] date/time data type (formerly include/utils/dt.h) Henry B. Hotz (Tue 25 19:12)
• [HACKERS] multi-column indices, again Vadim B. Mikheev (Mon 24 11:02)
• Re: [HACKERS] Patch for nbtree.c (6.1 970323) Bruce Momjian (Sun 23 19:58)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] Patch for nbtree.c (6.1 970323) Vadim B. Mikheev (Mon 24 03:57)
• [HACKERS] Changes to 970321.tar.gz for i386-solaris2.4 Christoph Kaesling (Sun 23 14:08)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] Changes to 970321.tar.gz for i386-solaris2.4 The Hermit Hacker (Tue 25 09:20)
• new to postgresql, but... FT14 (Sat 22 17:36)
• [HACKERS] signing ioff... ;-) Burak DAYIOGLU (Sat 22 07:50)
• [HACKERS] 970322 problem (Linux) Oleg Bartunov (Sat 22 07:39)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] 970322 problem (Linux) The Hermit Hacker (Sat 22 09:28)
• Re: [HACKERS] 970322 problem (Linux) Oleg Bartunov (Sat 22 12:13)
• [HACKERS] 970322.tar.gz nad endian.h (Linux) Oleg Bartunov (Sat 22 07:15)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] 970322.tar.gz nad endian.h (Linux) D'Arcy J.M. Cain (Sat 22 12:54)
• Re: [HACKERS] 970322.tar.gz nad endian.h (Linux) The Hermit Hacker (Tue 25 08:19)
• [HACKERS] backend/Makefile D'Arcy J.M. Cain (Fri 21 20:41)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] backend/Makefile The Hermit Hacker (Tue 25 08:15)
• [HACKERS] Need a clue :-) Michael P. Snyder (Fri 21 17:55)
• [HACKERS] Differences between PostgreSQL and Postgres95 ?? Yann Courties (Fri 21 17:09)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] Differences between PostgreSQL and Postgres95 ?? David Friend (Fri 21 17:24)
• Re: [HACKERS] Differences between PostgreSQL and Postgres95 ?? The Hermit Hacker (Fri 21 19:00)
• [HACKERS] backend/utils/adt/timestamp.c D'Arcy J.M. Cain (Fri 21 16:31)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] backend/utils/adt/timestamp.c The Hermit Hacker (Fri 21 18:59)
• Re: [HACKERS] backend/utils/adt/timestamp.c Dan McGuirk (Mon 24 18:36)
• Re: [HACKERS] backend/utils/adt/timestamp.c Thomas Lockhart (Mon 24 18:42)
• Re: [HACKERS] backend/utils/adt/timestamp.c Dan McGuirk (Mon 24 19:40)
• Re: [HACKERS] backend/utils/adt/timestamp.c Christopher Hicks (Mon 24 20:09)
• Re: [HACKERS] backend/utils/adt/timestamp.c Thomas Lockhart (Mon 24 20:33)
• Re: [HACKERS] backend/utils/adt/timestamp.c The Hermit Hacker (Tue 25 09:24)
• Re: [HACKERS] backend/utils/adt/timestamp.c Dan McGuirk (Tue 25 17:03)
• [HACKERS] configure and strerror() D'Arcy J.M. Cain (Fri 21 15:29)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] configure and strerror() The Hermit Hacker (Fri 21 18:56)
• [HACKERS] backend/utils/adt/nabstime.c D'Arcy J.M. Cain (Fri 21 15:28)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] backend/utils/adt/nabstime.c The Hermit Hacker (Fri 21 18:53)
• [HACKERS] backend/utils/adt/nabstime.c D'Arcy J.M. Cain (Wed 26 15:57)
• [HACKERS] A good way of storing date & time. David Friend (Fri 21 15:22)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] A good way of storing date & time. D'Arcy J.M. Cain (Fri 21 16:37)
• Re: [HACKERS] A good way of storing date & time. James A. Hillyerd (Fri 21 19:35)
• Re: [HACKERS] A good way of storing date & time. Henry B. Hotz (Sat 22 01:09)
• Re: [HACKERS] A good way of storing date & time. David Friend (Mon 24 14:44)
• Re: [HACKERS] A good way of storing date & time. Christopher Hicks (Mon 24 18:29)
• Re: [HACKERS] A good way of storing date & time. Thomas Lockhart (Tue 25 00:25)
• Re: [HACKERS] A good way of storing date & time. Henry B. Hotz (Tue 25 01:42)
• Re: [HACKERS] A good way of storing date & time. Mr Bojangle (Tue 25 08:05)
• Re: [HACKERS] A good way of storing date & time. Henry B. Hotz (Tue 25 19:15)
• Re: [HACKERS] A good way of storing date & time. Christopher Hicks (Tue 25 19:17)
• Re: [HACKERS] A good way of storing date & time. Thomas Lockhart (Thu 27 19:55)
• Re: [HACKERS] A good way of storing date & time. Gunther Schadow (Sat 29 09:53)
• [HACKERS] include/utils/dt.h D'Arcy J.M. Cain (Fri 21 14:43)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] include/utils/dt.h Henry B. Hotz (Fri 21 21:18)
• [HACKERS] Re: remove time-travel feature -- why? Vadim B. Mikheev (Fri 21 09:06)
• [HACKERS] remove time-travel feature -- why? schadow (Fri 21 08:21)
• [HACKERS] test for flex 2.5.3 Bruce Momjian (Fri 21 06:57)
• [HACKERS] Adding Univel/Unixware... Michael P. Snyder (Fri 21 01:38)
• [HACKERS] Sorry... Martin J. Laubach (Thu 20 22:43)
• [HACKERS] Lock timeout constant? Craig S. Anderson (Thu 20 20:24)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] Lock timeout constant? The Hermit Hacker (Thu 20 20:47)
• [HACKERS] Re: configure failes for 970319.tar.gz The Hermit Hacker (Thu 20 18:26)
• [HACKERS] libpq/pqcomm stuff and Solaris byte order D'Arcy J.M. Cain (Thu 20 16:15)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] libpq/pqcomm stuff and Solaris byte order The Hermit Hacker (Thu 20 18:22)
• Re: [HACKERS] libpq/pqcomm stuff and Solaris byte order D'Arcy J.M. Cain (Thu 20 18:30)
• Re: [HACKERS] libpq/pqcomm stuff and Solaris byte order The Hermit Hacker (Thu 20 19:13)
• Re: [HACKERS] libpq/pqcomm stuff and Solaris byte order darcy (Thu 20 19:28)
• Re: [HACKERS] libpq/pqcomm stuff and Solaris byte order The Hermit Hacker (Thu 20 19:40)
• Re: [HACKERS] libpq/pqcomm stuff and Solaris byte order Thomas Lockhart (Fri 21 01:48)
• Re: [HACKERS] libpq/pqcomm stuff and Solaris byte order Gunther Schadow (Fri 21 13:19)
• [HACKERS] RE: [QUESTIONS] string compare doesn't work Christopher Hicks (Thu 20 10:10)

---

• Main Index
• [Prev Page]
• [Next Page]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc