• Text Size: Normal / Large
• Donate
• Contact

Section Navigation

• Community
• Contributors
• Mailing Lists
  • Subscribe
  • User lists
  • Developer lists
    • pgsql-cluster-hackers
    • pgsql-committers
    • pgsql-hackers
    • pgsql-rrreviewers
    • pgsql-testers
    • pgsql-www
  • Regional lists
  • Associations
  • User groups
  • Project lists
  • Inactive lists
• IRC
• Featured Users
• International Sites
• Propaganda
• Resources
• Weekly News
• Community login
  • Profile
  • Lost password

pgsql-hackers 1997-01 Thread Index (2/6)

• Main Index
• [Prev Page]
• [Next Page]

• Re: [HACKERS] more on tzset(), (continued)
  • Re: [HACKERS] more on tzset() The Hermit Hacker (Fri 24 16:56)
  • Re: [HACKERS] more on tzset() Bruce Momjian (Fri 24 17:07)
  • Re: [HACKERS] more on tzset() The Hermit Hacker (Fri 24 17:22)
  • Re: [HACKERS] more on tzset() Bruce Momjian (Fri 24 17:23)
  • Re: [HACKERS] more on tzset() Thomas Straub (Fri 24 18:54)
  • Re: [HACKERS] more on tzset() Bruce Momjian (Sat 25 01:48)
  • Re: [HACKERS] more on tzset() Bruce Momjian (Sat 25 20:53)
• [HACKERS] Autoconf... The Hermit Hacker (Fri 24 00:50)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] Autoconf... Michael Graff (Fri 24 21:49)
• [HACKERS] Re: isViewRule(): SELECT failed Bruce Momjian (Thu 23 22:08)
• [HACKERS] Re: autoconf The Hermit Hacker (Thu 23 21:57)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: autoconf gnat (Thu 23 22:17)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: autoconf The Hermit Hacker (Thu 23 22:47)
• [HACKERS] autoconf Christopher Hicks (Thu 23 21:39)
• [HACKERS] 970123.tar.gz initdb bug afc (Thu 23 21:15)
• [HACKERS] Index bug? Alvaro Martinez Echevarria (Thu 23 20:57)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] Index bug? Bruce Momjian (Thu 23 21:33)
• [HACKERS] Re: [PG95]: REVOKE error (?) Bruce Momjian (Thu 23 20:38)
• [HACKERS] Re: Patches for 6.0 The Hermit Hacker (Thu 23 19:50)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [HACKERS] Re: Patches for 6.0 Massimo Dal Zotto (Thu 23 21:51)
• [HACKERS] SB_PAD removed Bruce Momjian (Thu 23 18:24)
• [HACKERS] Re: [PG95]: Kerberos support in version 6.0 Daniel Kalchev (Thu 23 18:23)
• Re: [HACKERS] Restore bug for date attributest Bruce Momjian (Thu 23 15:18)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] Restore bug for date attributest Frank Ridderbusch (Fri 24 13:20)
• Re: [HACKERS] Restore bug for date attributest Bruce Momjian (Fri 24 15:40)
• Re: [HACKERS] Restore bug for date attributest Frank Ridderbusch (Fri 24 20:14)
• [HACKERS] Re: your mail D'Arcy J.M. Cain (Thu 23 14:54)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [HACKERS] Re: your mail The Hermit Hacker (Thu 23 15:01)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: your mail Andrew Martin (Thu 23 15:12)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: your mail Brandon Ibach (Thu 23 19:27)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: your mail Dave (Thu 23 19:29)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: your mail The Hermit Hacker (Thu 23 19:51)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: your mail Brandon Ibach (Thu 23 20:27)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: your mail The Hermit Hacker (Thu 23 20:44)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: your mail Kurt J. Lidl (Thu 23 21:52)
• [HACKERS] Restore bug for date attributes Frank Ridderbusch (Thu 23 14:50)
• [HACKERS] Another Linux header problem... Andrew Martin (Thu 23 14:46)
• [HACKERS] Re: [PG95]: Indexes in 1.09 (and 6.0) unstable (fwd) System Administrator (Thu 23 14:39)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PG95]: Indexes in 1.09 (and 6.0) unstable (fwd) Vadim B. Mikheev (Fri 24 01:32)
• [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.0 970121 on SVR4 Frank Ridderbusch (Thu 23 14:39)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.0 970121 on SVR4 Bruce Momjian (Thu 23 15:13)
• Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.0 970121 on SVR4 The Hermit Hacker (Thu 23 15:58)
• [none] eigenstr (Thu 23 14:33)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [none] Owner of many system processes (Fri 24 14:53)
• [none] Owner of many system processes (Mon 27 12:21)
• [none] Owner of many system processes (Mon 27 12:31)
• [HACKERS] 970123 Andrew Martin (Thu 23 14:32)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] 970123 The Hermit Hacker (Thu 23 15:00)
• [HACKERS] invalid apostrophe character in attribute value? nyang (Thu 23 13:56)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] invalid apostrophe character in attribute value? Bruce Momjian (Thu 23 14:19)
• [HACKERS] Problems with pg_dump Keith Parks (Thu 23 09:24)
• [HACKERS] pg_dump not dumping Horace Posadas (Thu 23 05:45)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump not dumping Anton de Wet (Thu 23 16:54)
• Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump not dumping Bruce Momjian (Thu 23 17:06)
• Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump not dumping Anton de Wet (Thu 23 21:46)
• Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump not dumping Bruce Momjian (Thu 23 22:09)
• [HACKERS] User List? Web Master (Thu 23 01:46)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] User List? The Hermit Hacker (Thu 23 02:10)
• [HACKERS] Re: distance operator returns int4 rather than float8 Thomas Lockhart (Wed 22 22:55)
• pg_dump bug reports (was Re: [HACKERS] Minor whoopsie - syntax or data error?) John Robinson (Wed 22 19:25)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: pg_dump bug reports (was Re: [HACKERS] Minor whoopsie - syntax or data error?) Bruce Momjian (Thu 23 02:44)
• [HACKERS] Re: please help Bruce Momjian (Wed 22 16:19)
• [HACKERS] [PG95]: REVOKE error (?) (fwd) Bruce Momjian (Wed 22 16:12)
• [HACKERS] Fix in the module dl.c (FreeBSD port). Lenzi, Sergio (Wed 22 15:38)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] Fix in the module dl.c (FreeBSD port). The Hermit Hacker (Thu 23 16:08)
• [HACKERS] Fix in the module dl.c (FreeBSD port). Lenzi, Sergio (Thu 23 19:52)
• Re: [HACKERS] Fix in the module dl.c (FreeBSD port). The Hermit Hacker (Thu 23 22:08)
• Re: [HACKERS] Fix in the module dl.c (FreeBSD port). Lenzi, Sergio (Fri 24 18:38)
• [HACKERS] supping Randy Terbush (Wed 22 14:17)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] supping The Hermit Hacker (Wed 22 14:40)
• Re: [HACKERS] supping Bruce Momjian (Wed 22 16:25)
• [HACKERS] Other comments on Linux installation Andrew (Wed 22 13:56)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] Other comments on Linux installation Bruce Momjian (Wed 22 16:30)
• Re: [HACKERS] Other comments on Linux installation Andrew Martin (Wed 22 17:19)
• Re: [HACKERS] Other comments on Linux installation Bryan Henderson (Thu 23 05:12)
• Re: [HACKERS] Other comments on Linux installation Andrew Martin (Thu 23 10:20)
• Re: [HACKERS] Other comments on Linux installation Christopher Hicks (Thu 23 15:08)
• Re: [HACKERS] Other comments on Linux installation The Hermit Hacker (Thu 23 15:18)
• Re: [HACKERS] Other comments on Linux installation Christopher Hicks (Thu 23 15:30)
• Re: [HACKERS] Other comments on Linux installation Bruce Momjian (Thu 23 17:03)
• Re: [HACKERS] Other comments on Linux installation Andrew Martin (Thu 23 17:17)
• Re: [HACKERS] Other comments on Linux installation Christopher Hicks (Thu 23 17:52)
• Re: [HACKERS] Other comments on Linux installation Brandon Ibach (Thu 23 19:36)
• Re: [HACKERS] Other comments on Linux installation Christopher Hicks (Thu 23 19:40)
• [HACKERS] 970121 installation under Linux Andrew (Wed 22 13:24)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] 970121 installation under Linux Bryan Henderson (Thu 23 04:47)
• Re: [HACKERS] 970121 installation under Linux Bruce Momjian (Thu 23 05:10)
• Re: [HACKERS] 970121 installation under Linux Andrew Martin (Thu 23 10:13)
• Re: [HACKERS] 970121 installation under Linux Andrew Martin (Thu 23 10:17)
• Re: [HACKERS] 970121 installation under Linux Alistair Crooks (Thu 23 10:40)
• [HACKERS] Minor tweak of PORTNAME test in GNUmakefile Erik Bertelsen (Wed 22 11:04)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] Minor tweak of PORTNAME test in GNUmakefile Bryan Henderson (Thu 23 05:15)
• [HACKERS] AGAIN : Rules questions ??? Yann Courties (Wed 22 10:13)
• [HACKERS] small patch for indxpath.c Vadim B. Mikheev (Wed 22 06:52)
• [HACKERS] fixed bug in INDEXSCAN_PATCH Vadim B. Mikheev (Wed 22 05:16)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] fixed bug in INDEXSCAN_PATCH Vadim B. Mikheev (Wed 22 05:35)
• [HACKERS] PG 6.0 970120 backend does not link on i386_solaris Mark Wahl (Wed 22 03:46)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] PG 6.0 970120 backend does not link on i386_solaris The Hermit Hacker (Wed 22 04:16)
• [HACKERS] PG 6.0 970120 compilation stops due to warning on Solaris with gcc Mark Wahl (Wed 22 03:22)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] PG 6.0 970120 compilation stops due to warning on Solaris with gcc The Hermit Hacker (Wed 22 04:44)
• Re: [HACKERS] PG 6.0 970120 compilation stops due to warning on Solaris with gcc Erik Bertelsen (Wed 22 11:58)
• Re: [HACKERS] PG 6.0 970120 compilation stops due to warning on Solaris with gcc Keith Parks (Wed 22 23:17)
• Re: [HACKERS] PG 6.0 970120 compilation stops due to warning on Solaris with gcc Bryan Henderson (Thu 23 05:35)
• Re: [HACKERS] PG 6.0 970120 compilation stops due to warning on Solaris with gcc Bruce Momjian (Thu 23 06:03)
• Re: [HACKERS] PG 6.0 970120 compilation stops due to warning on Solaris with gcc The Hermit Hacker (Thu 23 06:19)
• Re: [HACKERS] PG 6.0 970120 compilation stops due to warning on Solaris with gcc D'Arcy J.M. Cain (Thu 23 08:30)
• Re: [HACKERS] PG 6.0 970120 compilation stops due to warning on Solaris with gcc Erik Bertelsen (Thu 23 20:28)
• [HACKERS] fix for OID/general casting fix Bruce Momjian (Wed 22 01:40)
• [HACKERS] MESSAGE_SIZE size... James W. Bennett (Wed 22 01:02)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] MESSAGE_SIZE size... Bruce Momjian (Wed 22 02:07)
• [HACKERS] Problem with pg_dump Anton de Wet (Tue 21 20:29)
• [HACKERS] Re: Getting involved Bruce Momjian (Tue 21 19:10)
• [HACKERS] Getting involved Christopher Hicks (Tue 21 18:53)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] Getting involved Vadim B. Mikheev (Wed 22 03:37)
• Re: [HACKERS] Getting involved lsh (Wed 22 14:38)
• [HACKERS] relations and postgres Jay (Tue 21 18:24)
• [HACKERS] Password-based authentication Dan McGuirk (Tue 21 16:31)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] Password-based authentication Bruce Momjian (Tue 21 18:45)
• Re: [HACKERS] Password-based authentication Dave (Tue 21 19:32)
• Re: [HACKERS] Password-based authentication Bryan Henderson (Thu 23 04:26)
• Re: [HACKERS] Password-based authentication Dave (Thu 23 18:11)
• Re: [HACKERS] PostgresPerl (fwd) Christopher Hicks (Tue 21 15:36)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] PostgresPerl (fwd) The Hermit Hacker (Tue 21 17:11)
• Re: [HACKERS] PostgresPerl (fwd) Christopher Hicks (Tue 21 17:25)
• Re: [HACKERS] PostgresPerl (fwd) Edmund Mergl (Tue 21 20:45)
• Re: [HACKERS] PostgresPerl (fwd) Edmund Mergl (Tue 21 21:33)
• [HACKERS] Rules questions ??? Yann Courties (Tue 21 13:54)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] Rules questions ??? wieck (Thu 23 08:52)
• [HACKERS] Re: [PG95]: pg95-6.0 unique indices - HOW? Christopher Hicks (Tue 21 10:51)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PG95]: pg95-6.0 unique indices - HOW? Andrew Martin (Tue 21 11:55)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PG95]: pg95-6.0 unique indices - HOW? Christopher Hicks (Tue 21 12:04)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PG95]: pg95-6.0 unique indices - HOW? Bruce Momjian (Tue 21 15:14)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PG95]: pg95-6.0 unique indices - HOW? Kurt J. Lidl (Tue 21 18:33)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PG95]: pg95-6.0 unique indices - HOW? Christopher Hicks (Tue 21 18:42)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PG95]: pg95-6.0 unique indices - HOW? Bruce Momjian (Tue 21 18:43)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PG95]: pg95-6.0 unique indices - HOW? Bruce Momjian (Tue 21 19:08)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: 970120 Bruce Momjian (Tue 21 03:23)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• [HACKERS] Re: 970120 Doug Sisk (Tue 21 03:55)
• Re: [HACKERS] Re: 970120 Erich Stamberger (Tue 21 07:51)
• [HACKERS] [QUESTIONS] postgres 6.0 Async Notification and Deadlock Issues (fwd) The Hermit Hacker (Tue 21 03:03)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] [QUESTIONS] postgres 6.0 Async Notification and Deadlock Issues (fwd) Edmund Mergl (Tue 21 20:16)
• [HACKERS] regression Makefile problem Bruce Momjian (Tue 21 01:33)
• [HACKERS] make install fails if /usr/local/pgsql not already created afc (Mon 20 20:54)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] make install fails if /usr/local/pgsql not already created Bryan Henderson (Tue 21 05:28)
• [HACKERS] 970120.tar.gz makefile fix afc (Mon 20 20:40)
• Re: [HACKERS] 970120.tar.gz compile bug; bitops.h solution afc (Mon 20 18:26)
• [HACKERS] JDBC Interface & Java version of libpq James W. Bennett (Mon 20 17:32)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] JDBC Interface & Java version of libpq Bruce Momjian (Mon 20 18:15)
• Re: [HACKERS] JDBC Interface & Java version of libpq Andrew Martin (Tue 21 11:14)
• [HACKERS] 970120.tar.gz compile bug afc (Mon 20 15:23)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] 970120.tar.gz compile bug Bruce Momjian (Mon 20 15:52)
• Re: [HACKERS] 970120.tar.gz compile bug Andrew Martin (Tue 21 11:06)
• Re: [HACKERS] 970120.tar.gz compile bug Bryan Henderson (Thu 23 03:55)
• Re: [HACKERS] 970120.tar.gz compile bug Bruce Momjian (Thu 23 04:18)
• Re: [HACKERS] 970120.tar.gz compile bug Bryan Henderson (Thu 23 05:57)
• Re: [HACKERS] 970120.tar.gz compile bug Bruce Momjian (Thu 23 06:07)
• Re: [HACKERS] 970120.tar.gz compile bug Bryan Henderson (Thu 23 06:27)
• Re: [HACKERS] 970120.tar.gz compile bug Andrew Martin (Thu 23 10:47)
• Re: [HACKERS] 970120.tar.gz compile bug Andrew Martin (Thu 23 10:51)
• [HACKERS] [PG95]: Bug with Float columns on AIX Patrice TROGNON (Mon 20 10:39)
• [HACKERS] Patch to customize script Andrew Martin (Mon 20 10:38)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] Patch to customize script The Hermit Hacker (Mon 20 12:17)
• [HACKERS] INSTALL file error Andrew Martin (Mon 20 10:36)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] INSTALL file error The Hermit Hacker (Mon 20 12:16)
• fixed: Re: [HACKERS] bug in bufmgr: Losing data changes Vadim B. Mikheev (Mon 20 05:45)
• fixed: Re: [HACKERS] Transaction problems Vadim B. Mikheev (Mon 20 05:05)
• [HACKERS] breaking pg_attribute. Keith Parks (Sun 19 20:04)
• [HACKERS] European dates Egghat (Sun 19 18:35)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] European dates The Hermit Hacker (Sun 19 18:49)
• Re: [HACKERS] European dates Bruce Momjian (Sun 19 19:37)
• Re: [HACKERS] European dates Andrew Martin (Mon 20 10:07)
• Re: [HACKERS] European dates Bryan Henderson (Tue 21 05:04)
• [HACKERS] European dates Andrew Martin (Mon 27 14:34)
• Re: [HACKERS] European dates The Hermit Hacker (Mon 27 20:53)
• [HACKERS] Problem with 6.0 and unique indices Olaf Klein (Sun 19 10:11)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] Problem with 6.0 and unique indices Bruce Momjian (Sun 19 10:24)
• [HACKERS] Failed assertion Craig S. Anderson (Sun 19 07:28)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] Failed assertion Vadim B. Mikheev (Mon 20 01:37)
• [HACKERS] Binary Distributions: Possible problem? The Hermit Hacker (Sat 18 17:41)
• <Possible follow-ups>
• Re: [HACKERS] Binary Distributions: Possible problem? Bryan Henderson (Sun 19 06:04)

---

• Main Index
• [Prev Page]
• [Next Page]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc