Re: writing backend extensions using Visual Studio
- From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
- To: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
- Cc: <greg(dot)landrum(at)gmail(dot)com>, <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: writing backend extensions using Visual Studio
- Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 13:32:46 +0100
- Message-id: <E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E472BDC2(at)ratbert(dot)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Dunstan [mailto:andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net]
> Sent: 29 March 2005 12:34
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: greg(dot)landrum(at)gmail(dot)com; pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] writing backend extensions
> using Visual Studio
>
>
> Don't you need the (fairly large) tree that is normally rooted at
> include/postgresql/server? This will contain things like funcapi.h and
> fmgr.h.
Yeah - these used to be installed by 'make install-all-headers' iirc,
however that has gone now. I can't see anything in /INSTALL or the docs
on what to use instead other than the source tree (which doesn't ship
with pgInstaller of course).
So, a question to anyone who knows, do we really need to ship *all*
headers with the installer, or is there a useful subset?
Regards, Dave
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index