Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: [HACKERS] Changing the default wal_sync_method to open_sync for
- From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
- To: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
- Cc: Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org, Merlin Moncure <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>
- Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Changing the default wal_sync_method to open_sync for
- Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 12:30:37 -0500 (EST)
- Message-id: <200503171730(dot)j2HHUbD09748(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Dave Page wrote: > > 2. Another question is what to do with 8.0.X? Do we > > backpatch this for > > Win32 performance? Can we test it enough to know it will work well? > > 8.0.2 is going to have a more rigorous testing cycle because of the > > buffer manager changes. > > This question was asked earlier, and iirc, a few people said yes, and > no-one said no. I'm most definitely in the yes camp. I have backpatched O_SYNC for Win32 to 8.0.X. Everyone seems to agree it should be supported by wal_sync_method. --- the "default" issue still needs discussion. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [HACKERS] Changing the default wal_sync_method to open_sync for
- From: Marc G. Fournier
- Re: [HACKERS] Changing the default wal_sync_method to open_sync for
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Changing the default wal_sync_method to open_sync for Win32?
- Next by Date: Re: [HACKERS] Changing the default wal_sync_method to open_sync for
- Previous by thread: Re: [HACKERS] Changing the default wal_sync_method to open_sync for Win32?
- Next by thread: Re: [HACKERS] Changing the default wal_sync_method to open_sync for
- Indexes: