Re: [HACKERS] Changing the default wal_sync_method to open_sync for Win32?
- From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
- To: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
- Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>
- Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Changing the default wal_sync_method to open_sync for Win32?
- Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 09:05:41 -0000
- Message-id: <E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E472BBF1(at)ratbert(dot)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Bruce Momjian
> Sent: 17 March 2005 04:20
> To: Magnus Hagander
> Cc: Tom Lane; pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org;
> pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org; Merlin Moncure
> Subject: [HACKERS] Changing the default wal_sync_method to
> open_sync for Win32?
>
> 1. Should it be the default wal_sync_method for Win32?
Yes.
> 2. Another question is what to do with 8.0.X? Do we
> backpatch this for
> Win32 performance? Can we test it enough to know it will work well?
> 8.0.2 is going to have a more rigorous testing cycle because of the
> buffer manager changes.
This question was asked earlier, and iirc, a few people said yes, and
no-one said no. I'm most definitely in the yes camp.
Regards, Dave.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index