• Text Size: Normal / Large
• Donate
• Contact

Section Navigation

• Community
• Contributors
• Mailing Lists
  • Subscribe
  • User lists
  • Developer lists
  • Regional lists
  • Associations
  • User groups
  • Project lists
  • Inactive lists
    • pgsql-benchmarks
    • pgsql-chat
    • pgsql-cygwin
    • pgsql-hackers-pitr
    • pgsql-hackers-win32
    • pgsql-interfaces
    • pgsql-patches
    • pgsql-ports
• IRC
• Featured Users
• International Sites
• Propaganda
• Resources
• Weekly News
• Community login
  • Profile
  • Lost password

pgsql-hackers-win32 2005-03 Chronological Index (1/1)

• Thread Index
• [Prev Page]
• [Next Page]

• 18 January 2012
  • [no subject] Unknown (03:41)
• 30 March 2005
  • Re: [BUGS] Enhancement: Remove NT/Interactive from Power Users Group Magnus Hagander (07:10)
  • Re: [BUGS] Enhancement: Remove NT/Interactive from Power Users Group Bruce Momjian (06:35)
• 29 March 2005
  • Re: writing backend extensions using Visual Studio Dave Page (15:46)
  • Re: writing backend extensions using Visual Studio Tom Lane (15:22)
  • Re: writing backend extensions using Visual Studio Dave Page (15:08)
  • Re: writing backend extensions using Visual Studio Greg Landrum (15:06)
  • Re: writing backend extensions using Visual Studio Magnus Hagander (15:05)
  • Re: writing backend extensions using Visual Studio Dave Page (14:55)
  • Re: writing backend extensions using Visual Studio Greg Landrum (14:52)
  • Re: writing backend extensions using Visual Studio Dave Page (12:33)
  • Re: writing backend extensions using Visual Studio Andrew Dunstan (11:24)
  • Re: writing backend extensions using Visual Studio Dave Page (07:37)
• 28 March 2005
  • Re: writing backend extensions using Visual Studio Greg Landrum (22:31)
  • Re: writing backend extensions using Visual Studio Dave Page (21:07)
  • Re: writing backend extensions using Visual Studio Greg Landrum (19:46)
• 26 March 2005
  • Re: writing backend extensions using Visual Greg Landrum (19:41)
  • Re: writing backend extensions using Visual Tom Lane (18:55)
  • Re: writing backend extensions using Visual Studio Bruce Momjian (17:40)
  • Re: writing backend extensions using Visual Studio Greg Landrum (16:39)
  • Re: writing backend extensions using Visual Andrew Dunstan (16:25)
  • Re: writing backend extensions using Visual Studio Greg Landrum (15:58)
• 25 March 2005
  • Re: writing backend extensions using Visual Studio Tom Lane (22:57)
  • writing backend extensions using Visual Studio Greg Landrum (22:28)
• 24 March 2005
  • Re: [HACKERS] win32 performance - fsync question Bruce Momjian (04:31)
  • Re: [GENERAL] Simple query takes a long time on win2K A. Mous (03:49)
• 23 March 2005
  • Re: [GENERAL] Simple query takes a long time on win2K A. Mous (19:57)
  • Re: [GENERAL] Simple query takes a long time on win2K Magnus Hagander (19:04)
  • Re: [GENERAL] Simple query takes a long time on win2K Tom Lane (18:11)
• 21 March 2005
  • Re: explain analyze timings Magnus Hagander (08:49)
• 20 March 2005
  • Re: Half filled xlogs Simon Riggs (23:09)
  • Re: explain analyze timings Tom Lane (22:30)
  • Re: explain analyze timings Magnus Hagander (18:37)
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests Andrew Dunstan (18:24)
  • Re: explain analyze timings Tom Lane (17:43)
  • Re: Half filled xlogs Magnus Hagander (16:02)
  • Re: explain analyze timings John A Meinel (16:01)
  • Half filled xlogs Simon Riggs (15:38)
  • Re: explain analyze timings Simon Riggs (15:32)
  • Re: explain analyze timings Magnus Hagander (13:42)
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests Bruce Momjian (05:11)
• 18 March 2005
  • Re: [HACKERS] Changing the default wal_sync_method to open_sync for Christopher Kings-Lynne (01:59)
• 17 March 2005
  • Re: [HACKERS] win32 performance - fsync question Bruce Momjian (19:38)
  • Re: [HACKERS] win32 performance - fsync question Tom Lane (19:36)
  • Re: [HACKERS] win32 performance - fsync question Dann Corbit (19:24)
  • Re: [HACKERS] win32 performance - fsync question Tom Lane (19:02)
  • Re: [HACKERS] win32 performance - fsync question Bruce Momjian (18:53)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Changing the default wal_sync_method to open_sync for Bruce Momjian (18:43)
  • Re: [HACKERS] win32 performance - fsync question Tom Lane (18:41)
  • Re: [HACKERS] win32 performance - fsync question Bruce Momjian (18:35)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Changing the default wal_sync_method to open_sync for Marc G. Fournier (18:15)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Changing the default wal_sync_method to open_sync for Marc G. Fournier (18:11)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Changing the default wal_sync_method to open_sync for Bruce Momjian (17:30)
  • Re: Changing the default wal_sync_method to open_sync for Win32? Merlin Moncure (13:19)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Changing the default wal_sync_method to open_sync for Dave Page (09:12)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Changing the default wal_sync_method to open_sync for Win32? Dave Page (09:06)
  • Re: [HACKERS] win32 performance - fsync question Magnus Hagander (09:05)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Changing the default wal_sync_method to open_sync for Win32? Magnus Hagander (08:45)
  • Re: [HACKERS] win32 performance - fsync question Michael Paesold (07:08)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Changing the default wal_sync_method to open_sync for Marc G. Fournier (05:32)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Changing the default wal_sync_method to open_sync for Bruce Momjian (04:32)
  • Re: [HACKERS] win32 performance - fsync question Bruce Momjian (04:29)
  • Re: Changing the default wal_sync_method to open_sync for Win32? Tom Lane (04:26)
  • Changing the default wal_sync_method to open_sync for Win32? Bruce Momjian (04:20)
• 16 March 2005
  • Re: [PATCHES] [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression Bruce Momjian (21:31)
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests Bruce Momjian (15:07)
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Nicolai Tufar (11:36)
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests Bruce Momjian (06:00)
  • Re: [HACKERS] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 Bruce Momjian (00:48)
• 15 March 2005
  • Re: [HACKERS] UNICODE/UTF-8 on win32 Bruce Momjian (04:01)
• 14 March 2005
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Tom Lane (19:41)
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests Bruce Momjian (19:39)
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Tom Lane (19:19)
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests Bruce Momjian (18:55)
• 12 March 2005
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Nicolai Tufar (15:01)
• 11 March 2005
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Nicolai Tufar (23:58)
  • Re: Repleacement for src/port/snprintf.c Bruce Momjian (21:31)
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression Bruce Momjian (17:44)
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression Bruce Momjian (17:37)
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression Tom Lane (17:23)
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression Bruce Momjian (17:14)
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression pgsql (17:01)
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests Bruce Momjian (16:21)
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests Bruce Momjian (16:18)
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Nicolai Tufar (06:41)
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Tom Lane (06:14)
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Nicolai Tufar (05:58)
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression Bruce Momjian (04:10)
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests Tom Lane (03:58)
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression pgsql (01:28)
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests Bruce Momjian (00:21)
• 10 March 2005
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Tom Lane (23:55)
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests Nicolai Tufar (22:43)
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests Bruce Momjian (21:26)
  • Re: Repleacement for src/port/snprintf.c Bruce Momjian (21:26)
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Nicolai Tufar (19:22)
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests Bruce Momjian (03:51)
• 09 March 2005
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression pgsql (15:37)
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Nicolai Tufar (12:40)
• 08 March 2005
  • Connection is closed in pg801 using pgadmin3 Rodrigo Moreno (20:37)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Help with tuning this query (with Magnus Hagander (09:05)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Help with tuning this query (with John A Meinel (04:35)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Help with tuning this query (with PFC (03:53)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Help with tuning this query (with Steinar H. Gunderson (02:06)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Help with tuning this query (with Tom Lane (02:02)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Help with tuning this query (with Steinar H. Gunderson (01:38)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Help with tuning this query (with Dave Held (00:29)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Help with tuning this query (with Dave Held (00:11)
• 07 March 2005
  • Re: [PERFORM] Help with tuning this query (with Greg Stark (23:15)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Help with tuning this query (with Dave Page (23:09)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Help with tuning this query (with Tom Lane (22:56)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Help with tuning this query (with John A Meinel (22:48)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Help with tuning this query (with explain analyze finally) Dave Held (22:34)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Help with tuning this query (with Dave Held (22:30)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Help with tuning this query (with Greg Stark (18:05)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Help with tuning this query (with John A Meinel (17:24)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Help with tuning this query (with explain analyze finally) Tom Lane (16:39)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Help with tuning this query (with John A Meinel (16:30)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Help with tuning this query (with explain analyze finally) Tom Lane (14:45)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Help with tuning this query (with explain analyze finally) Magnus Hagander (14:36)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Help with tuning this query (with explain analyze finally) Tom Lane (14:11)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Help with tuning this query (with explain analyze finally) Magnus Hagander (08:55)
• 06 March 2005
  • Fw: Question about odbc E U (16:06)
• 05 March 2005
  • Question about odbc E U (19:21)
• 03 March 2005
  • Re: [HACKERS] unexpected and reproducable crash in pl/pgsql function Merlin Moncure (21:29)
  • Re: [HACKERS] unexpected and reproducable crash in pl/pgsql function Tom Lane (21:20)
  • Re: [HACKERS] unexpected and reproducable crash in pl/pgsql function Merlin Moncure (21:04)
  • unexpected and reproducable crash in pl/pgsql function Merlin Moncure (19:49)
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests Bruce Momjian (00:02)
• 02 March 2005
  • Re: [PERFORM] Help with tuning this query (with explain analyze finally) Dave Held (23:01)
  • Re: [PERFORM] Help with tuning this query (with explain analyze finally) Tom Lane (22:29)
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression pgsql (21:39)
  • Re: Problem during postgresql-8.0.msi installation Magnus Hagander (18:48)
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Tom Lane (18:21)
  • Problem during postgresql-8.0.msi installation massimo . zanforlin (17:58)
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression pgsql (16:01)
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests Bruce Momjian (15:40)
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail pgsql (12:10)
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Nicolai Tufar (09:13)
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Joerg Hessdoerfer (08:24)
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Bruce Momjian (04:31)
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Bruce Momjian (04:22)
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Tom Lane (04:21)
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Bruce Momjian (03:23)
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Bruce Momjian (02:38)
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Tom Lane (02:32)
  • Re: snprintf causes regression tests to fail Bruce Momjian (01:54)
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Tom Lane (00:28)
  • Re: snprintf causes regression tests to fail Bruce Momjian (00:00)
• 01 March 2005
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Tom Lane (23:53)
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Nicolai Tufar (23:38)
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Tom Lane (23:15)
  • Re: snprintf causes regression tests to fail Nicolai Tufar (23:09)
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Nicolai Tufar (22:57)
  • Re: snprintf causes regression tests to fail Tom Lane (22:45)
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression Nicolai Tufar (22:26)
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Tom Lane (22:13)
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Nicolai Tufar (21:59)
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Joerg Hessdoerfer (21:43)
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Tom Lane (21:22)
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression pgsql (21:19)
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Nicolai Tufar (20:58)
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Magnus Hagander (20:44)
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression pgsql (20:37)
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests Tom Lane (20:31)
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression pgsql (20:27)
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Nicolai Tufar (20:20)
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests Bruce Momjian (14:28)
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Nicolai Tufar (14:23)
  • Re: [HACKERS] snprintf causes regression tests to fail Bruce Momjian (05:55)
  • Re: snprintf causes regression tests to fail Bruce Momjian (04:54)
  • Re: [HACKERS] Thread-safe snprintf() vsnprintf() and printf() Bruce Momjian (00:38)

• Thread Index
• [Prev Page]
• [Next Page]