Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: [HACKERS] win32 performance - fsync question
- From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
- To: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
- Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>
- Subject: Re: [HACKERS] win32 performance - fsync question
- Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 19:52:00 -0000
- Message-id: <E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E407B525(at)ratbert(dot)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
-----Original Message----- From: pgsql-hackers-win32-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org on behalf of Bruce Momjian Sent: Sun 2/27/2005 12:54 AM To: Magnus Hagander Cc: Tom Lane; pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org; pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org; Merlin Moncure Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] [HACKERS] win32 performance - fsync question > Patch applied. Thanks. > > I assume this is not approprate for 8.0.X. I think it would be good to backpatch it given proper testing - the changes are relatively minor, and they do give a significant performance boost. Regards, Dave
- Prev by Date: Re: [HACKERS] win32 performance - fsync question
- Next by Date: Re: [HACKERS] win32 performance - fsync question
- Previous by thread: Re: [HACKERS] win32 performance - fsync question
- Next by thread: Re: [HACKERS] win32 performance - fsync question
- Indexes: