Re: [HACKERS] win32 performance - fsync question
- From: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
- To: "Michael Paesold" <mpaesold(at)gmx(dot)at>, "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
- Cc: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>
- Subject: Re: [HACKERS] win32 performance - fsync question
- Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 12:26:22 +0100
- Message-id: <6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE4769D3(at)algol(dot)sollentuna(dot)se>
>> Patch applied. Thanks.
>>
>> I assume this is not approprate for 8.0.X.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>> > Magnus prepared a trivial patch which added the O_SYNC flag
>>> > for windows and mapped it to FILE_FLAG_WRITE_THROUGH in
>>> > win32_open.c.
>>>
>>> Attached is this trivial patch. As Merlin says, it needs some more
>>> reliability testing. But the numbers are at least reasonable - it
>>> *seems* like it's doing the right thing (as long as you
>turn off write
>>> cache). And it's certainly a significant performance increase - it
>>> brings the speed almost up to the same as linux.
>
>
>The original patch did not have any documentation. Have you
>added some?
>Since this has to be configured in GUC (wal_sync_method), the
>implications
>should be documented somewhere, no?
The patch just implements behaviour that was already documented (for
unix) on a new platform (win32). The documentation in general appears to
have very little information on what to pick there, though ;-)
//Magnus
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index