Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: [PATCHES] 300 seconds in less than 1 second with pg_autovacuum
- From: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
- To: <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
- Cc: <ghum(at)gmx(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: [PATCHES] 300 seconds in less than 1 second with pg_autovacuum
- Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 08:00:32 -0600 (CST)
- Message-id: <33833(dot)24(dot)211(dot)141(dot)25(dot)1106316032(dot)squirrel(at)www(dot)dunslane(dot)net>
Dave Page said: > >> >> Hmm: >> >> Windows: >> >> VOID Sleep(DWORD dwMilliseconds); >> >> Unix: >> >> unsigned int sleep(unsigned int seconds); >> >> D'oh! >> >> Patch coming up.... > We should not be using either of these, should we? pg_usleep() is platform independent. cheers andrew
- References:
- Re: 300 seconds in less than 1 second with pg_autovacuum
- From: Dave Page
- Re: 300 seconds in less than 1 second with pg_autovacuum
- Prev by Date: Re: 300 seconds in less than 1 second with pg_autovacuum
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCHES] 300 seconds in less than 1 second with pg_autovacuum
- Previous by thread: Re: 300 seconds in less than 1 second with pg_autovacuum
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCHES] 300 seconds in less than 1 second with pg_autovacuum
- Indexes: