Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: Fwd: 8.0 Beta3 worked, RC1 didn't!
- From: "Merlin Moncure" <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>
- To: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
- Cc: <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
- Subject: Re: Fwd: 8.0 Beta3 worked, RC1 didn't!
- Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 08:49:42 -0500
- Message-id: <6EE64EF3AB31D5448D0007DD34EEB3412A7587(at)Herge(dot)rcsinc(dot)local>
> I've now had confirmation from one person (Edgars) that this solves his > problem. I'd like confirmation from at least one more, but things point > towards this being the reason. > > Tom - what's next? Do we want to roll RC3 with this ugly fix, or do we > want to look at a better fix right away? > > One thought - what if we hard-code the address to somewhere at the 1Gb > limit? That would limit us to 1Gb of shared buffers (or 2Gb if started > witht he /3G switch to give user programs 3Gb in windows), but I don't > see *anybody* needing 1Gb shared buffers... Or is that a bad idea? > > //Magnus I can confirm the patched version fixes my busted win2k box. I was unable to get Magnus's compiled binary to work, maybe because I'm using gcc 3.4.1. Merlin
- Prev by Date: Re: Fwd: 8.0 Beta3 worked, RC1 didn't!
- Next by Date: Re: Fwd: 8.0 Beta3 worked, RC1 didn't!
- Previous by thread: Re: Fwd: 8.0 Beta3 worked, RC1 didn't!
- Next by thread: Re: Fwd: 8.0 Beta3 worked, RC1 didn't!
- Indexes: