Re: Fwd: 8.0 Beta3 worked, RC1 didn't!
- From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
- To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- Cc: Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org, nico(at)def2shoot(dot)com, merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com
- Subject: Re: Fwd: 8.0 Beta3 worked, RC1 didn't!
- Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 11:27:01 -0500 (EST)
- Message-id: <200412281627(dot)iBSGR3v02251(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > What if we malloc 100k just before we create the postmaster segment and
> > then free it and see if that fixes the postgres.exe problem?
>
> That was suggested already. As a permanent fix it's certainly
> unspeakably ugly, but it would be useful to try it just to prove
> (or disprove) that we understand the problem.
>
> It would probably be a good idea to make the padding at least 256K,
> since the numbers that have been tossed around seem to indicate that
> Windows may be aligning things on 128K boundaries.
>
> My inclination for a permanent fix would be to try to do the shmat()
> much earlier, but I don't think we should go to the effort of doing
> that code rearrangement until we've proven that this is indeed the
> issue.
Right. Merlin, I added you to this email. Can you test that? Do you
need us to send you a patch for testing?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index