Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: Performance on Win32 vs Cygwin
- From: Reini Urban <rurban(at)x-ray(dot)at>
- To: pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: Performance on Win32 vs Cygwin
- Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 21:40:59 +0200
- Message-id: <416ED64B(dot)3070000(at)x-ray(dot)at>
Magnus Hagander schrieb:
IIRC, previous versions of postgresql (< 8.0) did not correctly sync disks when running on Cygwin. I'm not 100% sure, can someone confirm? 8.0 does, and I beleive it does both under native win32 and cygwin.
yes, sync is a NOOP on cygwin.
It's been my experience that the native version is slightly faster than the cygwin one, but I've only compared 8.0 to 8.0.
Sure. This is expected. Cygwin's interim's layer costs a lot of time. (process handling, path resolution)
-- Reini Urban http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/
- References:
- Re: Performance on Win32 vs Cygwin
- From: Magnus Hagander
- Re: Performance on Win32 vs Cygwin
- Prev by Date: Is there going to be an installer for V8 Beta 3?
- Next by Date: Re: Is there going to be an installer for V8 Beta 3?
- Previous by thread: Re: Performance on Win32 vs Cygwin
- Next by thread: Re: Performance on Win32 vs Cygwin
- Indexes: