Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: "Operation on non-socket" analysis
- From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
- To: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: "Operation on non-socket" analysis
- Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 09:02:20 +0100
- Message-id: <E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4306632@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk> <text/plain>
> -----Original Message----- > From: pgsql-hackers-win32-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org > [mailto:pgsql-hackers-win32-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf > Of Magnus Hagander > Sent: 22 September 2004 12:57 > To: pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org > Subject: [pgsql-hackers-win32] "Operation on non-socket" analysis > > Does anybody have any further ideas on this subject? Nice catch. I'm dubious about nasty workarounds to fix other ppls broken software however (especially when things like SSL don't work yet :-p ). I would vote for simply detecting the problem and pointing people at some documentation on it's cause. Regards, Dave
- Prev by Date: Re: installer automation
- Next by Date: Documentation
- Previous by thread: "Operation on non-socket" analysis
- Next by thread: installer automation
- Indexes: