Re: [HACKERS] more dirmod CYGWIN
- From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
- To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
- Cc: "Reini Urban" <rurban(at)x-ray(dot)at>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "PostgreSQL Win32 port list" <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: [HACKERS] more dirmod CYGWIN
- Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 09:43:16 +0100
- Message-id: <E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E407B400(at)ratbert(dot)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-hackers-win32-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org on behalf of Tom Lane
Sent: Fri 9/10/2004 10:20 PM
To: Bruce Momjian
Cc: Reini Urban; PostgreSQL-development; PostgreSQL Win32 port list
Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] [HACKERS] more dirmod CYGWIN
> We don't --- apparently the win32 crowd hadn't bothered to try it until
> recently. There are a couple of patches in the queue that claim to make
> individual modules work, but I dunno what the overall situation is.
I posted a list of a 8-10 a few days ago that didn't compile. Most do, and as Tom says, a few patches have been posted. There are some such as pg_logger that I believe are now obsolete on all platforms incidently.
Regards, Dave
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index