Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: [HACKERS] Testing needed for recent
- From: markir(at)coretech(dot)co(dot)nz
- To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
- Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Testing needed for recent
- Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2004 09:44:37 +1200
- Message-id: <1093988677(dot)60f89c3865d0c(at)mail(dot)coretech(dot)co(dot)nz>
Quoting Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>: > > Yep, related. There was a typo in win32.h for lstat that was exposed by > the new tablespace changes. I also added the proper parameters rather > than just redefining the symbol. > > Attached is the patch. Do we need to repackage beta2 for this? Tom did > ask for Win32 testers two days ago and it is just being tested now. > Apologies for the awful timing - cpu on my windows box died on Saturday, and only got a replacement going yesterday (I know it sounds a bit like 'the dog ate my homework'...) regards Mark
- References:
- Re: Testing needed for recent tablespace
- From: Bruce Momjian
- Re: Testing needed for recent tablespace
- Prev by Date: initdb error
- Next by Date: [no subject]
- Previous by thread: Re: Testing needed for recent tablespace
- Next by thread: Re: Testing needed for recent tablespace hacking
- Indexes: