Re: [PATCHES] GUC variables invisible to contrib/ modules
- From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- To: "Mark Cave-Ayland" <m(dot)cave-ayland(at)webbased(dot)co(dot)uk>
- Cc: "'Bruce Momjian'" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org, "'PostgreSQL-patches'" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: [PATCHES] GUC variables invisible to contrib/ modules
- Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 11:18:29 -0400
- Message-id: <4644(dot)1092755909(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
"Mark Cave-Ayland" <m(dot)cave-ayland(at)webbased(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> So I guess I was looking more for clarification that this was the
> "official" way to access GUC information?
It isn't, and isn't likely to become so, at least not for C code.
We generally think of the C code as being at a lower level than SQL.
If we rename a global variable that underlies a GUC variable, it's
probably because we *want* to break any C code that references it
--- perhaps the semantics are changing, or something like that.
regards, tom lane
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index