Re: Win32 question: getppid() with no parent?
- From: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
- To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- Cc: "PgSql-Win32" <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: Win32 question: getppid() with no parent?
- Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 20:14:37 +0200
- Message-id: <6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE1716A5(at)algol(dot)sollentuna(dot)se>
>> Question though - we keep a PostmasterPid variable, right?
>
>Yeah we do; we must have it to signal the postmaster from the children.
>
>> (If we can't rely on that variable, we could do a win32 specific hack
>> that passes the HANDLE of the postmaster down to the child on exec, I
>> guess.)
>
>Is this just like passing a variable value, or is there some more
>protection involved?
It is passing a variable. *Before* you parse it, you have to make it
inheritable by doing something along the line of:
DuplicateHandle(GetCurrentProcess(), GetCurrentProcess(),
GetCurrentProcess(), &targetHandle, 0, TRUE, DUPLICATE_SAME_ACCESS);
(If you just do GetCurrentProcess() it will return a hard-coded
pseudohandle. So if you use that handle in the child process, it will
point to the child process. DuplicateHandle will turn it into a real
handle)
//Magnus
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index