Re: pg_ctl
- From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
- To: pgsql-hackers-win32 <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: pg_ctl
- Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 11:39:23 -0500
- Message-id: <4061B9BB(dot)9090703(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Tom Lane wrote:
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
Are we now in a state where it would make sense to look at doing pg_ctl
in C?
Why bother? I should think that Windows users want to run PG as a service.
Not unreasonable. Maybe someone who uses/distributes a commercial
Windows version can inform us about usage patterns. If that's what we
decide we should remove this from the Win32 page:
. Create C version of pg_ctl?
And while on the subject of that page, this issue should now be fixed
with the listen_addresses patch (which I hope someone can verify):
Postmaster must be started with -i flag, or with tcpip_socket = true in
postgresql.conf, else the postmaster will fail to start and issue the
following error:
|LOG: select() failed in postmaster: No such file or directory
cheers
andrew
|
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index