Skip site navigation
(1)
Skip section navigation
(2)
Search
Peripheral Links
Text Size:
Normal
/
Large
Donate
Contact
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Home
About
Downloads
Documentation
Community
Developers
Support
Section Navigation
Community
Contributors
Mailing Lists
Subscribe
User lists
Developer lists
Regional lists
Associations
User groups
Project lists
Inactive lists
pgsql-benchmarks
pgsql-chat
pgsql-cygwin
pgsql-hackers-pitr
pgsql-hackers-win32
pgsql-interfaces
pgsql-patches
pgsql-ports
IRC
Featured Users
International Sites
Propaganda
Resources
Weekly News
Community login
Profile
Lost password
Search archives
Advanced Search
pgsql-hackers-win32 2004-02 Thread Index (1/1)
Last updated: Wed Jan 18 03:42:09 2012
125 messages
Main Index
[Prev Page]
[Next Page]
Why not fork PHP.NET
Jean-Michel POURE (Thu 26 22:11)
win32 patch
Bruce Momjian (Wed 25 20:01)
Postmaster failed to start and/or accept connexion
Laurent Ballester (Tue 24 15:01)
Re: Postmaster failed to start and/or accept connexion
Joerg Hessdoerfer (Wed 25 08:09)
Re: Postmaster failed to start and/or accept connexion
Laurent Ballester (Wed 25 10:56)
Re: Postmaster failed to start and/or accept connexion
Joerg Hessdoerfer (Wed 25 11:22)
Re: [HACKERS] Win32 regression test status
Claudio Natoli (Tue 24 12:52)
Re: [HACKERS] Win32 regression test status
George Weaver (Tue 24 15:33)
Re: [HACKERS] Win32 regression test status
Andrew Dunstan (Tue 24 15:43)
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [HACKERS] Win32 regression test status
Claudio Natoli (Tue 24 14:19)
Win32 regression test status
Claudio Natoli (Tue 24 11:11)
Re: [HACKERS] Win32 regression test status
Joerg Hessdoerfer (Tue 24 11:42)
Re: [HACKERS] Win32 regression test status
Andrew Dunstan (Tue 24 11:59)
Re: [HACKERS] Win32 regression test status
Tom Lane (Tue 24 15:19)
Re: Win32 regression test status
Tom Lane (Tue 24 15:33)
Re: Win32 mingw libpq.dll
Bruce Momjian (Wed 18 15:31)
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Win32 mingw libpq.dll
Magnus Hagander (Wed 18 15:45)
Re: Win32 mingw libpq.dll
Dave Page (Wed 18 15:47)
Re: Win32 mingw libpq.dll
Claudio Natoli (Wed 18 22:34)
Re: [HACKERS] Win32 development question
Bruce Momjian (Wed 18 03:50)
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [HACKERS] Win32 development question
Claudio Natoli (Wed 18 09:55)
more info from the interix port
Merlin Moncure (Tue 17 15:04)
win32 setitimer implementation
Magnus Hagander (Thu 12 20:22)
Re: [PATCHES] win32 setitimer implementation
Bruce Momjian (Wed 18 16:25)
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: win32 setitimer implementation
Claudio Natoli (Tue 17 11:25)
Re: win32 setitimer implementation
Magnus Hagander (Tue 17 14:34)
Re: win32 setitimer implementation
Magnus Hagander (Tue 17 21:04)
win32 patch: Signal delivery when blocking on semaphore
Magnus Hagander (Thu 12 19:25)
Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary
Magnus Hagander (Thu 12 18:41)
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary
Claudio Natoli (Thu 12 22:53)
Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary
Magnus Hagander (Fri 13 12:11)
Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary
Claudio Natoli (Fri 13 13:05)
Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary
Magnus Hagander (Fri 13 13:35)
Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary
Claudio Natoli (Fri 13 14:17)
Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary
Andrew Dunstan (Fri 13 15:04)
Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary
Claudio Natoli (Fri 13 23:04)
Psql link succeded
Ronald Kuczek (Thu 12 17:04)
Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary installer)
Bruce Momjian (Thu 12 16:19)
Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary
Andrew Dunstan (Thu 12 17:36)
Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary
Bruce Momjian (Thu 12 17:47)
Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary
Ronald Kuczek (Thu 12 18:37)
Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary
Ronald Kuczek (Thu 12 23:18)
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary installer)
Magnus Hagander (Thu 12 18:39)
Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary installer)
Bruce Momjian (Thu 12 18:52)
Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary installer)
Magnus Hagander (Thu 12 19:02)
Problem with win 32 libpq calls
Daniel Gerardo Lucero Baylon (Wed 11 23:11)
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Problem with win 32 libpq calls
Merlin Moncure (Fri 13 19:33)
Re: [PATCHES] Updated win32 readdir patch
Magnus Hagander (Sun 08 22:24)
Re: [PATCHES] Updated win32 readdir patch
Bruce Momjian (Mon 09 16:53)
Updated win32 readdir patch
Magnus Hagander (Sun 08 21:24)
Re: [PATCHES] Updated win32 readdir patch
Tom Lane (Sun 08 22:17)
Re: Updated win32 readdir patch
Bruce Momjian (Thu 12 20:30)
Re: Updated win32 readdir patch
Bruce Momjian (Tue 17 03:47)
Psql linking
Ronald Kuczek (Sat 07 00:10)
Re: [PATCHES] win32 signals, part 5
Magnus Hagander (Fri 06 22:32)
Re: [PATCHES] win32 signals, part 5
Bruce Momjian (Mon 09 21:43)
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [PATCHES] win32 signals, part 5
Magnus Hagander (Sun 08 21:32)
Installing postgresql on Windows question
Wei Wang (Fri 06 22:03)
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Installing postgresql on Windows question
Magnus Hagander (Fri 06 22:22)
Re: Installing postgresql on Windows question
Wei Wang (Fri 06 23:01)
Re: Installing postgresql on Windows question
Magnus Hagander (Sun 08 21:33)
Re: [HACKERS] Sync vs. fsync during checkpoint
Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD (Thu 05 11:45)
Re: [HACKERS] Sync vs. fsync during checkpoint
Tom Lane (Thu 05 14:54)
Re: [HACKERS] Sync vs. fsync during checkpoint
Jan Wieck (Fri 06 16:09)
Re: [HACKERS] Sync vs. fsync during checkpoint
Bruce Momjian (Sun 08 01:44)
Re: [HACKERS] Sync vs. fsync during checkpoint
Jan Wieck (Mon 09 15:34)
Re: [HACKERS] Sync vs. fsync during checkpoint
Tom Lane (Mon 09 16:27)
Win32 regression tests
Claudio Natoli (Thu 05 03:00)
Re: Win32 regression tests
Tom Lane (Thu 05 03:50)
Re: Win32 regression tests
Andrew Dunstan (Thu 05 06:22)
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Win32 regression tests
Claudio Natoli (Thu 05 06:34)
Re: [PATCHES] win32 signals, part 4
Claudio Natoli (Thu 05 02:34)
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [PATCHES] win32 signals, part 4
Magnus Hagander (Fri 06 22:14)
pqsignal - to be or (in this case) not to be
Magnus Hagander (Wed 04 22:16)
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: pqsignal - to be or (in this case) not to be
Merlin Moncure (Wed 04 22:24)
Re: pqsignal - to be or (in this case) not to be
Tom Lane (Wed 04 23:31)
Re: pqsignal - to be or (in this case) not to be
Magnus Hagander (Wed 04 23:33)
Re: pqsignal - to be or (in this case) not to be
Tom Lane (Wed 04 23:38)
win32 signals, part 4
Magnus Hagander (Wed 04 22:08)
Re: [PATCHES] win32 signals, part 4
Jan Wieck (Thu 05 02:32)
Re: [PATCHES] win32 signals, part 4
Neil Conway (Fri 06 21:24)
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: win32 signals, part 4
Magnus Hagander (Wed 04 22:14)
Re: win32 signals, part 4
Claudio Natoli (Thu 05 01:17)
Re: win32 signals, part 4
Magnus Hagander (Thu 05 09:08)
Re: win32 signals, part 4
Claudio Natoli (Thu 05 12:16)
Re: win32 signals, part 4
Magnus Hagander (Thu 05 15:34)
psql does not link with readline
Ronald Kuczek (Wed 04 22:00)
Re: psql does not link with readline
Bruce Momjian (Sun 08 01:53)
Win32 sample service code
Ronald Kuczek (Wed 04 19:15)
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Win32 sample service code
Magnus Hagander (Wed 04 19:32)
New win32 signals patch (3)
Magnus Hagander (Tue 03 23:46)
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: New win32 signals patch (3)
Claudio Natoli (Wed 04 03:32)
Re: New win32 signals patch (3)
Magnus Hagander (Wed 04 09:02)
Re: New win32 signals patch (3)
Claudio Natoli (Wed 04 09:55)
Re: New win32 signals patch (3)
Tom Lane (Wed 04 15:36)
Re: New win32 signals patch (3)
Claudio Natoli (Wed 04 11:01)
Re: New win32 signals patch (3)
Magnus Hagander (Wed 04 15:45)
Re: New win32 signals patch (3)
Tom Lane (Wed 04 16:18)
Re: New win32 signals patch (3)
Magnus Hagander (Wed 04 16:27)
interix port running...
Merlin Moncure (Tue 03 20:32)
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: interix port running...
Merlin Moncure (Wed 04 14:35)
Re: pg_config.h on interix
Sami Kuhmonen (Tue 03 12:48)
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: pg_config.h on interix
Merlin Moncure (Tue 03 13:43)
Re: [PATCHES] Proposed dirmod.c fix for Win32
Bruce Momjian (Mon 02 22:04)
Win32 signals patch #2
Magnus Hagander (Mon 02 21:35)
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Win32 signals patch #2
Magnus Hagander (Mon 02 22:36)
Re: [HACKERS] What's left?
Jan Wieck (Mon 02 16:35)
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: [HACKERS] What's left?
Steve Tibbett (Mon 02 16:45)
Re: [HACKERS] What's left?
Alvaro Herrera (Mon 02 21:19)
Re: [HACKERS] What's left?
Jan Wieck (Tue 03 02:07)
Re: [HACKERS] What's left?
Steve Tibbett (Mon 02 21:26)
Re: [HACKERS] What's left?
Andrew Dunstan (Mon 02 22:11)
Re: [HACKERS] Pre-1970 dates under Win32
Claudio Natoli (Mon 02 07:27)
Re: CVS source win32 mingw some comile err
Claudio Natoli (Mon 02 06:03)
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: CVS source win32 mingw some comile err
Claudio Natoli (Mon 02 06:17)
Pre-1970 dates under Win32
Claudio Natoli (Mon 02 05:55)
Re: [HACKERS] Pre-1970 dates under Win32
Tom Lane (Mon 02 06:57)
Re: [HACKERS] Pre-1970 dates under Win32
Kurt Roeckx (Mon 02 07:37)
Re: [HACKERS] Pre-1970 dates under Win32
Tom Lane (Mon 02 08:08)
CVS source win32 mingw some comile error
Korea PostgreSQL Users' Group (Mon 02 05:20)
Re: CVS source win32 mingw some comile error
Bruce Momjian (Mon 02 17:21)
<Possible follow-ups>
CVS source win32 mingw some comile error
Korea PostgreSQL Users' Group (Mon 02 05:58)
Re: win32 patch: allows source to be compiled
Bruce Momjian (Mon 02 00:12)
Re: Sync vs. fsync during checkpoint
Bruce Momjian (Sun 01 13:33)
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Sync vs. fsync during checkpoint
Bruce Momjian (Wed 04 18:41)
Main Index
[Prev Page]
[Next Page]
Mail converted by
MHonArc
Privacy Policy
|
About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996 – 2012 PostgreSQL Global Development Group