Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary installer)
- From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
- To: Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
- Cc: Merlin Moncure <merlin(dot)moncure(at)rcsonline(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary installer)
- Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 13:51:51 -0500 (EST)
- Message-id: <200402121851(dot)i1CIppi02396(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >What additional things to we need to deal with if we go the
> >direction of
> >having the environment variables set from the registry and read-only in
> >the process?
>
> I still beleive this way of doing things will be the best. If you want
> it in the system environment, you can use that. If you put it in the
> registry (service specific, for example), that will override those
> settings and be used instead.
I was thinking we can allow the environment to override the registry to
allow multiple postmasters.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index