• Text Size: Normal / Large
• Donate
• Contact

Section Navigation

• Community
• Contributors
• Mailing Lists
  • Subscribe
  • User lists
  • Developer lists
  • Regional lists
  • Project lists
  • User groups
  • Inactive lists
    • pgsql- benchmarks
    • pgsql-chat
    • pgsql-hackers- win32
• IRC
• Featured Users
• International Sites
• Propaganda
• Resources
• Weekly News
• Community login
  • Profile
  • Lost password

pgsql-hackers-win32 2004-02 Chronological Index (1/1)

• Thread Index
• [Prev Page]
• [Next Page]

• 26 February 2004
  • Why not fork PHP.NET Jean-Michel POURE
• 25 February 2004
  • win32 patch Bruce Momjian
  • Re: Postmaster failed to start and/or accept connexion Joerg Hessdoerfer
  • Re: Postmaster failed to start and/or accept connexion Laurent Ballester
  • Re: Postmaster failed to start and/or accept connexion Joerg Hessdoerfer
• 24 February 2004
  • Re: [HACKERS] Win32 regression test status Andrew Dunstan
  • Re: [HACKERS] Win32 regression test status George Weaver
  • Re: Win32 regression test status Tom Lane
  • Re: [HACKERS] Win32 regression test status Tom Lane
  • Postmaster failed to start and/or accept connexion Laurent Ballester
  • Re: [HACKERS] Win32 regression test status Claudio Natoli
  • Re: [HACKERS] Win32 regression test status Claudio Natoli
  • Re: [HACKERS] Win32 regression test status Andrew Dunstan
  • Re: [HACKERS] Win32 regression test status Joerg Hessdoerfer
  • Win32 regression test status Claudio Natoli
• 18 February 2004
  • Re: Win32 mingw libpq.dll Claudio Natoli
  • Re: [PATCHES] win32 setitimer implementation Bruce Momjian
  • Re: Win32 mingw libpq.dll Dave Page
  • Re: Win32 mingw libpq.dll Magnus Hagander
  • Re: Win32 mingw libpq.dll Bruce Momjian
  • Re: [HACKERS] Win32 development question Claudio Natoli
  • Re: [HACKERS] Win32 development question Bruce Momjian
• 17 February 2004
  • Re: win32 setitimer implementation Magnus Hagander
  • more info from the interix port Merlin Moncure
  • Re: win32 setitimer implementation Magnus Hagander
  • Re: win32 setitimer implementation Claudio Natoli
  • Re: Updated win32 readdir patch Bruce Momjian
• 13 February 2004
  • Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary Claudio Natoli
  • Re: Problem with win 32 libpq calls Merlin Moncure
  • Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary Andrew Dunstan
  • Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary Claudio Natoli
  • Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary Magnus Hagander
  • Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary Claudio Natoli
  • Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary Magnus Hagander
• 12 February 2004
  • Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary Ronald Kuczek
  • Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary Claudio Natoli
  • Re: Updated win32 readdir patch Bruce Momjian
  • win32 setitimer implementation Magnus Hagander
  • win32 patch: Signal delivery when blocking on semaphore Magnus Hagander
  • Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary installer) Magnus Hagander
  • Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary installer) Bruce Momjian
  • Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary Magnus Hagander
  • Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary installer) Magnus Hagander
  • Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary Ronald Kuczek
  • Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary Bruce Momjian
  • Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary Andrew Dunstan
  • Psql link succeded Ronald Kuczek
  • Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary installer) Bruce Momjian
• 11 February 2004
  • Problem with win 32 libpq calls Daniel Gerardo Lucero Baylon
• 09 February 2004
  • Re: [PATCHES] win32 signals, part 5 Bruce Momjian
  • Re: [PATCHES] Updated win32 readdir patch Bruce Momjian
  • Re: [HACKERS] Sync vs. fsync during checkpoint Tom Lane
  • Re: [HACKERS] Sync vs. fsync during checkpoint Jan Wieck
• 08 February 2004
  • Re: [PATCHES] Updated win32 readdir patch Magnus Hagander
  • Re: [PATCHES] Updated win32 readdir patch Tom Lane
  • Re: Installing postgresql on Windows question Magnus Hagander
  • Re: [PATCHES] win32 signals, part 5 Magnus Hagander
  • Updated win32 readdir patch Magnus Hagander
  • Re: psql does not link with readline Bruce Momjian
  • Re: [HACKERS] Sync vs. fsync during checkpoint Bruce Momjian
• 07 February 2004
  • Psql linking Ronald Kuczek
• 06 February 2004
  • Re: Installing postgresql on Windows question Wei Wang
  • Re: [PATCHES] win32 signals, part 5 Magnus Hagander
  • Re: Installing postgresql on Windows question Magnus Hagander
  • Re: [PATCHES] win32 signals, part 4 Magnus Hagander
  • Installing postgresql on Windows question Wei Wang
  • Re: [PATCHES] win32 signals, part 4 Neil Conway
  • Re: [HACKERS] Sync vs. fsync during checkpoint Jan Wieck
• 05 February 2004
  • Re: win32 signals, part 4 Magnus Hagander
  • Re: [HACKERS] Sync vs. fsync during checkpoint Tom Lane
  • Re: win32 signals, part 4 Claudio Natoli
  • Re: [HACKERS] Sync vs. fsync during checkpoint Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD
  • Re: win32 signals, part 4 Magnus Hagander
  • Re: Win32 regression tests Claudio Natoli
  • Re: Win32 regression tests Andrew Dunstan
  • Re: Win32 regression tests Tom Lane
  • Win32 regression tests Claudio Natoli
  • Re: [PATCHES] win32 signals, part 4 Claudio Natoli
  • Re: [PATCHES] win32 signals, part 4 Jan Wieck
  • Re: win32 signals, part 4 Claudio Natoli
• 04 February 2004
  • Re: pqsignal - to be or (in this case) not to be Tom Lane
  • Re: pqsignal - to be or (in this case) not to be Magnus Hagander
  • Re: pqsignal - to be or (in this case) not to be Tom Lane
  • Re: pqsignal - to be or (in this case) not to be Merlin Moncure
  • pqsignal - to be or (in this case) not to be Magnus Hagander
  • Re: win32 signals, part 4 Magnus Hagander
  • win32 signals, part 4 Magnus Hagander
  • psql does not link with readline Ronald Kuczek
  • Re: Win32 sample service code Magnus Hagander
  • Win32 sample service code Ronald Kuczek
  • Re: Sync vs. fsync during checkpoint Bruce Momjian
  • Re: New win32 signals patch (3) Magnus Hagander
  • Re: New win32 signals patch (3) Tom Lane
  • Re: New win32 signals patch (3) Magnus Hagander
  • Re: New win32 signals patch (3) Tom Lane
  • Re: interix port running... Merlin Moncure
  • Re: New win32 signals patch (3) Claudio Natoli
  • Re: New win32 signals patch (3) Claudio Natoli
  • Re: New win32 signals patch (3) Magnus Hagander
  • Re: New win32 signals patch (3) Claudio Natoli
• 03 February 2004
  • New win32 signals patch (3) Magnus Hagander
  • interix port running... Merlin Moncure
  • Re: pg_config.h on interix Merlin Moncure
  • Re: pg_config.h on interix Sami Kuhmonen
  • Re: [HACKERS] What's left? Jan Wieck
• 02 February 2004
  • Re: Win32 signals patch #2 Magnus Hagander
  • Re: [HACKERS] What's left? Andrew Dunstan
  • Re: [PATCHES] Proposed dirmod.c fix for Win32 Bruce Momjian
  • Win32 signals patch #2 Magnus Hagander
  • Re: [HACKERS] What's left? Steve Tibbett
  • Re: [HACKERS] What's left? Alvaro Herrera
  • Re: CVS source win32 mingw some comile error Bruce Momjian
  • Re: [HACKERS] What's left? Steve Tibbett
  • Re: [HACKERS] What's left? Jan Wieck
  • Re: [HACKERS] Pre-1970 dates under Win32 Tom Lane
  • Re: [HACKERS] Pre-1970 dates under Win32 Kurt Roeckx
  • Re: [HACKERS] Pre-1970 dates under Win32 Claudio Natoli
  • Re: [HACKERS] Pre-1970 dates under Win32 Tom Lane
  • Re: CVS source win32 mingw some comile err Claudio Natoli
  • Re: CVS source win32 mingw some comile err Claudio Natoli
  • CVS source win32 mingw some comile error Korea PostgreSQL Users' Group
  • Pre-1970 dates under Win32 Claudio Natoli
  • CVS source win32 mingw some comile error Korea PostgreSQL Users' Group
  • Re: win32 patch: allows source to be compiled Bruce Momjian
• 01 February 2004
  • Re: Sync vs. fsync during checkpoint Bruce Momjian

• Thread Index
• [Prev Page]
• [Next Page]