Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
125 messages
25 February 2004
Re: Postmaster failed to start and/or accept connexion Joerg Hessdoerfer (11:22)
Re: Postmaster failed to start and/or accept connexion Laurent Ballester (10:56)
Re: Postmaster failed to start and/or accept connexion Joerg Hessdoerfer (08:09)
24 February 2004
Re: [HACKERS] Win32 regression test status George Weaver (15:33)
Re: Win32 regression test status Tom Lane (15:33)
Re: [HACKERS] Win32 regression test status Tom Lane (15:19)
Postmaster failed to start and/or accept connexion Laurent Ballester (15:01)
Re: [HACKERS] Win32 regression test status Claudio Natoli (14:19)
Re: [HACKERS] Win32 regression test status Claudio Natoli (12:52)
Re: [HACKERS] Win32 regression test status Andrew Dunstan (11:59)
Re: [HACKERS] Win32 regression test status Joerg Hessdoerfer (11:42)
Win32 regression test status Claudio Natoli (11:11)
18 February 2004
Re: [PATCHES] win32 setitimer implementation Bruce Momjian (16:25)
Re: Win32 mingw libpq.dll Dave Page (15:47)
Re: Win32 mingw libpq.dll Magnus Hagander (15:45)
Re: Win32 mingw libpq.dll Bruce Momjian (15:31)
Re: [HACKERS] Win32 development question Claudio Natoli (09:55)
Re: [HACKERS] Win32 development question Bruce Momjian (03:50)
17 February 2004
more info from the interix port Merlin Moncure (15:04)
Re: win32 setitimer implementation Magnus Hagander (14:34)
Re: win32 setitimer implementation Claudio Natoli (11:25)
Re: Updated win32 readdir patch Bruce Momjian (03:47)
13 February 2004
Re: Problem with win 32 libpq calls Merlin Moncure (19:33)
Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary Andrew Dunstan (15:04)
Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary Claudio Natoli (14:17)
Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary Magnus Hagander (13:35)
Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary Claudio Natoli (13:05)
Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary Magnus Hagander (12:11)
12 February 2004
Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary Claudio Natoli (22:53)
Re: Updated win32 readdir patch Bruce Momjian (20:30)
win32 setitimer implementation Magnus Hagander (20:22)
win32 patch: Signal delivery when blocking on semaphore Magnus Hagander (19:25)
Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary installer) Magnus Hagander (19:02)
Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary installer) Bruce Momjian (18:52)
Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary Magnus Hagander (18:41)
Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary installer) Magnus Hagander (18:39)
Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary Ronald Kuczek (18:37)
Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary Bruce Momjian (17:47)
Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary Andrew Dunstan (17:36)
Psql link succeded Ronald Kuczek (17:04)
Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary installer) Bruce Momjian (16:19)
11 February 2004
09 February 2004
Re: [PATCHES] Updated win32 readdir patch Bruce Momjian (16:53)
Re: [HACKERS] Sync vs. fsync during checkpoint Tom Lane (16:27)
Re: [HACKERS] Sync vs. fsync during checkpoint Jan Wieck (15:34)
08 February 2004
Re: [PATCHES] Updated win32 readdir patch Tom Lane (22:17)
Re: Installing postgresql on Windows question Magnus Hagander (21:33)
Re: [PATCHES] win32 signals, part 5 Magnus Hagander (21:32)
Updated win32 readdir patch Magnus Hagander (21:24)
Re: psql does not link with readline Bruce Momjian (01:53)
Re: [HACKERS] Sync vs. fsync during checkpoint Bruce Momjian (01:44)
07 February 2004
06 February 2004
Re: [PATCHES] win32 signals, part 5 Magnus Hagander (22:32)
Re: Installing postgresql on Windows question Magnus Hagander (22:22)
Re: [PATCHES] win32 signals, part 4 Magnus Hagander (22:14)
Installing postgresql on Windows question Wei Wang (22:03)
Re: [PATCHES] win32 signals, part 4 Neil Conway (21:24)
Re: [HACKERS] Sync vs. fsync during checkpoint Jan Wieck (16:09)
05 February 2004
Re: [HACKERS] Sync vs. fsync during checkpoint Tom Lane (14:54)
Re: win32 signals, part 4 Claudio Natoli (12:16)
Re: [HACKERS] Sync vs. fsync during checkpoint Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD (11:45)
Re: win32 signals, part 4 Magnus Hagander (09:08)
Re: Win32 regression tests Claudio Natoli (06:34)
Re: Win32 regression tests Andrew Dunstan (06:22)
Re: Win32 regression tests Tom Lane (03:50)
Win32 regression tests Claudio Natoli (03:00)
Re: [PATCHES] win32 signals, part 4 Claudio Natoli (02:34)
Re: [PATCHES] win32 signals, part 4 Jan Wieck (02:32)
Re: win32 signals, part 4 Claudio Natoli (01:17)
04 February 2004
Re: pqsignal - to be or (in this case) not to be Magnus Hagander (23:33)
Re: pqsignal - to be or (in this case) not to be Tom Lane (23:31)
Re: pqsignal - to be or (in this case) not to be Merlin Moncure (22:24)
pqsignal - to be or (in this case) not to be Magnus Hagander (22:16)
Re: win32 signals, part 4 Magnus Hagander (22:14)
win32 signals, part 4 Magnus Hagander (22:08)
psql does not link with readline Ronald Kuczek (22:00)
Re: Win32 sample service code Magnus Hagander (19:32)
Win32 sample service code Ronald Kuczek (19:15)
Re: Sync vs. fsync during checkpoint Bruce Momjian (18:41)
Re: New win32 signals patch (3) Magnus Hagander (16:27)
Re: New win32 signals patch (3) Tom Lane (16:18)
Re: New win32 signals patch (3) Magnus Hagander (15:45)
Re: New win32 signals patch (3) Tom Lane (15:36)
Re: interix port running... Merlin Moncure (14:35)
Re: New win32 signals patch (3) Claudio Natoli (11:01)
Re: New win32 signals patch (3) Claudio Natoli (09:55)
Re: New win32 signals patch (3) Magnus Hagander (09:02)
Re: New win32 signals patch (3) Claudio Natoli (03:32)
03 February 2004
interix port running... Merlin Moncure (20:32)
Re: pg_config.h on interix Merlin Moncure (13:43)
Re: pg_config.h on interix Sami Kuhmonen (12:48)
Re: [HACKERS] What's left? Jan Wieck (02:07)
02 February 2004
Re: [HACKERS] What's left? Andrew Dunstan (22:11)
Re: [PATCHES] Proposed dirmod.c fix for Win32 Bruce Momjian (22:04)
Win32 signals patch #2 Magnus Hagander (21:35)
Re: [HACKERS] What's left? Steve Tibbett (21:26)
Re: [HACKERS] What's left? Alvaro Herrera (21:19)
Re: CVS source win32 mingw some comile error Bruce Momjian (17:21)
Re: [HACKERS] What's left? Steve Tibbett (16:45)
Re: [HACKERS] What's left? Jan Wieck (16:35)
Re: [HACKERS] Pre-1970 dates under Win32 Tom Lane (08:08)
Re: [HACKERS] Pre-1970 dates under Win32 Kurt Roeckx (07:37)
Re: [HACKERS] Pre-1970 dates under Win32 Claudio Natoli (07:27)
Re: [HACKERS] Pre-1970 dates under Win32 Tom Lane (06:57)
Re: CVS source win32 mingw some comile err Claudio Natoli (06:17)
Re: CVS source win32 mingw some comile err Claudio Natoli (06:03)
CVS source win32 mingw some comile error Korea PostgreSQL Users' Group (05:58)
Pre-1970 dates under Win32 Claudio Natoli (05:55)
CVS source win32 mingw some comile error Korea PostgreSQL Users' Group (05:20)
Re: win32 patch: allows source to be compiled Bruce Momjian (00:12)
01 February 2004
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
pgsql-hackers-win32 2004-02 Chronological Index (1/1)
Last updated: Wed Jan 18 03:42:09 2012125 messages
- Thread Index
- [Prev Page]
- [Next Page]
- 26 February 2004
- Why not fork PHP.NET Jean-Michel POURE (22:11)
- win32 patch Bruce Momjian (20:01)
- Re: [HACKERS] Win32 regression test status Andrew Dunstan (15:43)
- Re: Win32 mingw libpq.dll Claudio Natoli (22:34)
- Re: win32 setitimer implementation Magnus Hagander (21:04)
- Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary Claudio Natoli (23:04)
- Re: registry vs. environment (was re:binary Ronald Kuczek (23:18)
- Problem with win 32 libpq calls Daniel Gerardo Lucero Baylon (23:11)
- Re: [PATCHES] win32 signals, part 5 Bruce Momjian (21:43)
- Re: [PATCHES] Updated win32 readdir patch Magnus Hagander (22:24)
- Psql linking Ronald Kuczek (00:10)
- Re: Installing postgresql on Windows question Wei Wang (23:01)
- Re: win32 signals, part 4 Magnus Hagander (15:34)
- Re: pqsignal - to be or (in this case) not to be Tom Lane (23:38)
- New win32 signals patch (3) Magnus Hagander (23:46)
- Re: Win32 signals patch #2 Magnus Hagander (22:36)
- Re: Sync vs. fsync during checkpoint Bruce Momjian (13:33)
- Thread Index
- [Prev Page]
- [Next Page]