Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: fork/exec
- From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
- To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- Cc: Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Win32 port list <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: fork/exec
- Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2003 16:42:10 -0500 (EST)
- Message-id: <200311282142(dot)hASLgAL13880(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes: > > Oh, good. I couldn't remember if it was the postmaster or child that > > validates that key. I now remember only the postmaster needs the secret > > because it sends the signal. > > However, the child process needs the secret for long enough to send it > off to the client at the completion of the authentication handshake. > So there is a problem to resolve here. Oh, yea, so they do both need it. Good point. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
- References:
- Re: fork/exec
- From: Tom Lane
- Re: fork/exec
- Prev by Date: Re: fork/exec
- Next by Date: Re: pg_ctl
- Previous by thread: Re: fork/exec
- Next by thread: Re: fork/exec
- Indexes: