Re: [PATCHES] MinGW patch
- From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
- Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Win32 port list <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: [PATCHES] MinGW patch
- Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2003 09:58:23 -0400
- Message-id: <24380(dot)1062943103(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Why does configure need to see those files? Surely you don't need
> configure to test the capabilities of our own source tree?
Looking at the contents of src/include/port/win32, I would imagine the
problem is configure will decide we don't HAVE_SYS_SOCKET_H, etc.
regards, tom lane
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index