Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Peripheral Links

Header And Logo

PostgreSQL
| The world's most advanced open source database.

Site Navigation

Search archives
  Advanced Search

Re: NOT IN (NULL) ?


  • From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
  • To: "Paul" <magamos(at)mail(dot)ru>
  • Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
  • Subject: Re: NOT IN (NULL) ?
  • Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 13:19:14 -0400
  • Message-id: <24334.1288545554@sss.pgh.pa.us> <text/plain>

"Paul" <magamos(at)mail(dot)ru> writes:
> But  there  is  not  such  thing  in PostgreSQL as empty set as "IN ()" that must be
> false, because nothing element may be found in empty set.
> And  I  thought that instead of "IN ()" I could use "IN (NULL)", but I
> was failed and result was NULL and not FALSE. :(

NULL is not an alternative spelling for an empty set.

You could get an empty IN set by using a sub-select yielding no rows,
for example

regression=# select 1 in (select 1 where false);
 ?column? 
----------
 f
(1 row)

regression=# select 1 not in (select 1 where false);
 ?column? 
----------
 t
(1 row)

			regards, tom lane



Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996 – 2012 PostgreSQL Global Development Group