Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: No PL/PHP ? Any reason?
- From: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>
- To: jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com
- Cc: John DeSoi <desoi(at)pgedit(dot)com>, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>, Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, Shoaib Mir <shoaibmir(at)gmail(dot)com>, Carlo Stonebanks <stonec(dot)register(at)sympatico(dot)ca>, "pgsql-general\(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: No PL/PHP ? Any reason?
- Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 10:49:39 +0200
- Message-id: <87hbksu864.fsf@hi-media-techno.com> <text/plain>
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes: >> Any chance that the Parrot runtime could be used for PHP and other languages? I read that some folks are working on PL/Parrot. I'd really like to have PHP and Lisp for PL languages :). > > http://plscheme.projects.postgresql.org/ > > Not exactly lisp, but.... But it's using gnu guile, version 2 of which should support multiple languages. It's expected to get released with scheme, javascript and lua support last I checked, and maybe with Emacs Lisp support too. http://www.gnu.org/software/soc-projects/ideas-2010.html#guile So who want to open bets for Parrot versus Guile2? More seriously though, it could be that our best bet to have pl/js is plscheme and guile2. Regards, -- dim
- References:
- No PL/PHP ? Any reason?
- From: Carlo Stonebanks
- Re: No PL/PHP ? Any reason?
- From: Shoaib Mir
- Re: No PL/PHP ? Any reason?
- From: Devrim GUNDUZ
- Re: No PL/PHP ? Any reason?
- From: Scott Marlowe
- Re: No PL/PHP ? Any reason?
- From: John DeSoi
- Re: No PL/PHP ? Any reason?
- From: Joshua D. Drake
- No PL/PHP ? Any reason?
- Prev by Date: Re: unexpected effect of FOREIGN KEY ON CASCADE DELETE
- Next by Date: Bad query performance with more conditions?
- Previous by thread: Re: No PL/PHP ? Any reason?
- Next by thread: Re: No PL/PHP ? Any reason?
- Indexes: