Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Peripheral Links

Header And Logo

PostgreSQL
| The world's most advanced open source database.

Site Navigation

Search archives
  Advanced Search

Re: Performance evaluation of PostgreSQL's historic releases


  • From: György Vilmos <vilmos(dot)gyorgy(at)gmail(dot)com>
  • To: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
  • Cc: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
  • Subject: Re: Performance evaluation of PostgreSQL's historic releases
  • Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 20:21:54 +0200
  • Message-id: <dac6660e0909301121v4f48a0a2tfe99d8d563c5f785@mail.gmail.com> <text/plain>

2009/9/30 Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>

> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com> wrote:
> > P.S. On your write-heavy tests, increasing checkpoint_segments a lot
> should
> > improve overall performance, if you re-test at some point.
>
> Just wanted to add that in order to really test a db, you need a
> benchmark that runs a lot longer than a few minutes.  I routinely use
> tests that run for hours to get an idea how things like write ahead
> logging and such affect the db under heavy, long term load.
>

Agreed, but even with 5x1 minutes of test runs for each threads it took a
week to do all the tests.

I've once heard that a company have spent three man years for performance
testing one of its products...

-- 
http://suckit.blog.hu/


Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996 – 2012 PostgreSQL Global Development Group