Re: pg_restore question (-T and -t)
- From: Martin Gainty <mgainty(at)hotmail(dot)com>
- To: <tony_caduto(at)amsoftwaredesign(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: pg_restore question (-T and -t)
- Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 20:37:28 -0500
- Message-id: <BLU142-W1339EA463C45482F7CAB98AEE50@phx.gbl> <text/plain>
Tony-
pgdump version 8.3 will dump multiple tables (with multiple -t)
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/app-pgdump.html
but I dont see the same multiple table functionality with pgrestore
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/app-pgrestore.html
you may have found a bug..
Martin Gainty
______________________________________________
Disclaimer and confidentiality note
Everything in this e-mail and any attachments relates to the official business of Sender. This transmission is of a confidential nature and Sender does not endorse distribution to any party other than intended recipient. Sender does not necessarily endorse content contained within this transmission.
> Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2008 15:49:39 -0600
> From: tony_caduto(at)amsoftwaredesign(dot)com
> To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: [GENERAL] pg_restore question (-T and -t)
>
> Hi,
> does anyone know if you can do multiple
> -T or -t (restore named trigger, restore name table) switches?
>
> In the docs for pg_restore it does not specify if it will accept more
> than one, but in the pg_dump docs the -n and -t switches allow multiples.
>
> Thanks,
>
> tony
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
_________________________________________________________________
It’s the same Hotmail®. If by “same” you mean up to 70% faster.
http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_hotmail_acq_broad1_122008
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index