Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: ranked subqueries vs distinct question
- From: Karsten Hilbert <Karsten(dot)Hilbert(at)gmx(dot)net>
- To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: ranked subqueries vs distinct question
- Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 16:14:19 +0200
- Message-id: <20080520141418(dot)GC4249(at)merkur(dot)hilbert(dot)loc>
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 10:36:31AM -0500, David McNett wrote: > If the view is limited as you describe, don't use is. Ah, of course, that was the best advice amongst all :-) Karsten -- GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346
- References:
- ranked subqueries vs distinct question
- From: Karsten Hilbert
- Re: ranked subqueries vs distinct question
- From: David McNett
- Re: ranked subqueries vs distinct question
- From: Karsten Hilbert
- Re: ranked subqueries vs distinct question
- From: Decibel!
- Re: ranked subqueries vs distinct question
- From: Karsten Hilbert
- Re: ranked subqueries vs distinct question
- From: David McNett
- ranked subqueries vs distinct question
- Prev by Date: Server Configuration
- Next by Date: Re: rounding problems
- Previous by thread: Re: ranked subqueries vs distinct question
- Next by thread: Re: ranked subqueries vs distinct question
- Indexes: