Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Peripheral Links

Header And Logo

PostgreSQL
| The world's most advanced open source database.

Site Navigation

Search for
  Advanced Search

Re: Is this a bug? (changing sequences in default value)



En un mensaje anterior, Merlin Moncure escribió:
> On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 8:50 AM, Fernando Schapachnik
> <fernando(at)mecon(dot)gov(dot)ar> wrote:
> >  > > ALTER SEQUENCE name [ INCREMENT [ BY ] increment ]
> >  > >    [ MINVALUE minvalue | NO MINVALUE ] [ MAXVALUE maxvalue | NO
> >  > > MAXVALUE ]
> >  > >    [ RESTART [ WITH ] start ] [ CACHE cache ] [ [ NO ] CYCLE ]
> >  >
> >  > oop, you are using 8.1 :-).  This was added in a later version.  drop
> >  > sequence ... cascade should probably work.  you can try it out in a
> >  > transaction to be sure.
> >
> >  Thanks for your help, but cascade doesn't make a difference.
> 
> What do you mean? PostgreSQL 8.1 has 'drop sequence cascade':
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/interactive/sql-dropsequence.html
> 
> If this isn't working, can you paste the text of the error message?

Sorry I wasn't clear. I mean to say that the error message is the same 
with or without cascade:

sso=# drop SEQUENCE table1_id_seq cascade;
ERROR:  cannot drop sequence table1_id_seq because table 
ambitos column id requires it
HINT:  You may drop table table1 column id instead.

Thanks.

Fernando.



Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Privacy Policy | PostgreSQL Archives hosted by Command Prompt, Inc. | Designed by tinysofa
Copyright © 1996 – 2008 PostgreSQL Global Development Group