Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: partitioning using dblink
- From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- To: Scara Maccai <m_lists(at)yahoo(dot)it>
- Cc: Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: partitioning using dblink
- Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:12:30 -0500
Scara Maccai <m_lists(at)yahoo(dot)it> writes: > I got that there should be no difference... plus, I don't get any > errors, You should have. The system enforces (or tries to) that a view can't be part of an inheritance hierarchy, but you seem to have managed to find a sequence of operations that avoids those checks. Turning a table into a view with a manual CREATE RULE operation has always been a kluge, and it's missing a check that the table isn't part of an inheritance tree. regards, tom lane
- References:
- Re: partitioning using dblink
- From: Scara Maccai
- Re: partitioning using dblink
- Prev by Date: issue with an assembled date field
- Next by Date: Re: issue with an assembled date field
- Previous by thread: Re: partitioning using dblink
- Next by thread: syntax errors at "line 1" when executing every command
- Indexes: