Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
PL/Tcl implementation
- From: fschmidt <fschmidt(at)gmail(dot)com>
- To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: PL/Tcl implementation
- Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 13:41:41 -0800 (PST)
- Message-id: <15215251.post@talk.nabble.com> <text/plain>
Why doesn't the PL/Tcl (and PL/Python) implementation use the SPI functions? For example pltcl_set_tuple_values() calls NameStr() instead of SPI_fname() and heap_getattr() instead of SPI_getbinval(). Why? This makes the code impossible to follow for someone who is not familiar with the postgres source and has only read the online documentation. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/PL-Tcl-implementation-tp15215251p15215251.html Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: PL/Tcl implementation
- From: Alvaro Herrera
- Re: PL/Tcl implementation
- Prev by Date: Re: Is PostGreSql's Data storage mechanism "inferior"?
- Next by Date: Re: Oracle Analytical Functions
- Previous by thread: [UMN_MAPSERVER-USERS] query postgres AND oracle
- Next by thread: Re: PL/Tcl implementation
- Indexes: