Re: Is PostGreSql's Data storage mechanism "inferior"?

["Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 10:04:53 +1300
"Andrej Ricnik-Bay" <andrej(dot)groups(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On 01/02/2008, Tony Caduto <tony_caduto(at)amsoftwaredesign(dot)com> wrote:
> > The part about the BSD license is bogus. A BSD license is the most
> > desirable of any Open Source license and gives you the right to use
> > PostgreSQL in your commercial apps without worry.

> While I'm a big fan of the BSD license (for varied reasons) I think
> that OpenSource hardliners like RMS would argue that the BSD license
> is *NOT* in the true spirit of OpenSource *BECAUSE* of what you list
> as a bonus of it ... the locking down of benefits reaped from
> OpenSource not getting back into the stream.

RMS wouldn't make any such argument at all. His argument would be
centered around FREE not OpenSource software.

Joshua D. Drake

> 
> 
> Cheers,
> Andrej
> 
> 


- -- 
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/ 
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL SPI Liaison | SPI Director |  PostgreSQL political pundit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHonjaATb/zqfZUUQRAjfrAKCZu2KZigaCrNT6c9nbuAFYImRhdQCeI4uT
2gdMn7CA9XExIynw5mFogBs=
=pqTR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----