Re: Is PostGreSql's Data storage mechanism "inferior"?
- From: "Andrej Ricnik-Bay" <andrej(dot)groups(at)gmail(dot)com>
- To: "Tony Caduto" <tony_caduto(at)amsoftwaredesign(dot)com>
- Cc: "Postgres General List" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: Is PostGreSql's Data storage mechanism "inferior"?
- Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 10:04:53 +1300
- Message-id: <b35603930801311304i312e6ebfo9d401b38732644fb@mail.gmail.com> <text/plain>
On 01/02/2008, Tony Caduto <tony_caduto(at)amsoftwaredesign(dot)com> wrote:
> The part about the BSD license is bogus. A BSD license is the most
> desirable of any Open Source license and gives you the right to use
> PostgreSQL in your commercial apps without worry.
While I'm a big fan of the BSD license (for varied reasons) I think that
OpenSource hardliners like RMS would argue that the BSD license is *NOT*
in the true spirit of OpenSource *BECAUSE* of what you list as a bonus
of it ... the locking down of benefits reaped from OpenSource not getting
back into the stream.
Cheers,
Andrej
--
Please don't top post, and don't use HTML e-Mail :} Make your quotes concise.
http://www.american.edu/econ/notes/htmlmail.htm
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index