Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: 8.3RC2 vs 8.2.6 testing results
- From: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
- To: PG-General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: 8.3RC2 vs 8.2.6 testing results
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 00:24:29 -0500 (EST)
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Tom Lane wrote:
I speculate that you're noticing the slightly slower/more complicated hash function that 8.3 uses for integers.
There was a similar slowdown in the Clodaldo case you tracked down recently. Is it worth considering an addition to the release notes warning about this class of problem? If there have been two of them so far just in the beta I wonder how many people are going to run into some variant of this in the future.
-- * Greg Smith gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD
- References:
- 8.3RC2 vs 8.2.6 testing results
- From: Vlad
- Re: 8.3RC2 vs 8.2.6 testing results
- From: Tom Lane
- 8.3RC2 vs 8.2.6 testing results
- Prev by Date: Re: 8.3RC2 vs 8.2.6 testing results
- Next by Date: Re: 8.3RC2 vs 8.2.6 testing results
- Previous by thread: Re: 8.3RC2 vs 8.2.6 testing results
- Next by thread: Re: 8.3RC2 vs 8.2.6 testing results
- Indexes: