Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
On Fri, 2007-12-28 at 12:33 -0300, marcelo Cortez wrote:
Does this happen to be on Novell SLES/SLED 10? I saw this bug sporadically and in several applications 6-9 months ago. I don't think I ever knew the cause or even what specifically tickled this problem, but my recollection is that a Novell patch set fixed it.
I remember that I saw a log of these in /var/log/messages (assuming you're logging locally). Consider looking there to see if you have other instances of this bug with other applications.
-Reece
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: double free corruption?
- From: Reece Hart <reece(at)harts(dot)net>
- To: marcelo Cortez <jmdc_marcelo(at)yahoo(dot)com(dot)ar>
- Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: double free corruption?
- Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 10:29:04 -0800
On Fri, 2007-12-28 at 12:33 -0300, marcelo Cortez wrote:
i received the follow message from backend ,it's this...
a bug?
*** glibc detected *** postgres: postgres richelet
201.235.11.133(2504) SELECT: double free or corruption
(!prev): 0x0845d7e8 ***
======= Backtrace: =========
Does this happen to be on Novell SLES/SLED 10? I saw this bug sporadically and in several applications 6-9 months ago. I don't think I ever knew the cause or even what specifically tickled this problem, but my recollection is that a Novell patch set fixed it.
I remember that I saw a log of these in /var/log/messages (assuming you're logging locally). Consider looking there to see if you have other instances of this bug with other applications.
-Reece
-- Reece Hart, http://harts.net/reece/, GPG:0x25EC91A0 |
- References:
- double free corruption?
- From: marcelo Cortez
- double free corruption?
- Prev by Date: Re: [TLM] Re: batch insert/update
- Next by Date: basic questions: Postgres with yum on CentOS 5.1
- Previous by thread: Re: double free corruption?
- Next by thread: Re: double free corruption?
- Indexes: