Re: WAL to RAW devices ?
- From: Alex Vinogradovs <AVinogradovs(at)Clearpathnet(dot)com>
- To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: WAL to RAW devices ?
- Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2007 17:18:13 -0700
- Message-id: <1188605893.6082.51.camel@localhost> <text/plain>
But would it be a problem to have only 1 active segment at all times ?
My inspiration pretty much comes from Oracle, where redo logs are
pre-configured and can be switched by a command issued to the instance.
> Just because you'd like that to be true doesn't make it true. We have
> to manage a variable number of active segments; track whether a given
> segment is waiting for future use, active, waiting to be archived, etc;
> manage status signaling to the archiver process; and so on. Now I'll
> freely admit that using a filesystem is only one of the ways that those
> problems could be attacked, but that's how they've been attacked in
> Postgres. If you want to not have that functionality present then
> you'd need to rewrite all that code and provide some other
> infrastructure for it to use.
>
> regards, tom lane
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index