Re: PostgreSQL vs Firebird feature comparison finished
- From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- To: "Stephen Ince" <since(at)opendemand(dot)com>
- Cc: "Tony Caduto" <tony_caduto(at)amsoftwaredesign(dot)com>, "Greg Smith" <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs Firebird feature comparison finished
- Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 18:04:39 +0100
- Message-id: <200708271804400000(at)1426722598>
> ------- Original Message -------
> From: "Stephen Ince" <since(at)opendemand(dot)com>
> To: "Tony Caduto" <tony_caduto(at)amsoftwaredesign(dot)com>, "Greg Smith" <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Sent: 27/08/07, 17:02:21
> Subject: Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL vs Firebird feature comparison finished
>
> Postgres can't be embedded or serverless. Firebird has the embedded feature.
> Most of the databases have this capability (hsqldb, derby,oracle,mysql,
> firebird, and db2). Derby and hsqldb are the only free embedded databases
> for commercial use.
>
SQL Server CE is also free for commercial use iirc.
Regards, Dave
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index