Re: greatest/least semantics different between oracle and postgres

[Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>]

Gregory Stark wrote:
> "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> 
> > GREATEST/LEAST aren't in the spec, so there's not much help there.
> >
> > Except ... if they ever do get added to the spec, what do you think
> > the spec will say?  The odds it'd contradict Oracle seem about nil.
> 
> Fwiw even in the min/max/sum case the spec is moving away from having
> aggregates ignore NULL values. You now get a warning in Oracle if your
> aggregate includes any NULL inputs.

How does Oracle's new behavior relate to the standard moving?

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>          http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                               http://www.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +