Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: greatest/least semantics different between oracle and postgres
- From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- To: "paul rivers" <rivers(dot)paul(at)gmail(dot)com>
- Cc: "'Ben'" <bench(at)silentmedia(dot)com>, "'PostgreSQL General \(\(EN\)\)'" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: greatest/least semantics different between oracle and postgres
- Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 01:44:41 -0400
"paul rivers" <rivers(dot)paul(at)gmail(dot)com> writes: > But I question the original poster's report of Oracle's behavior. I don't > have 9.2.0.8 to test, but on 9.2.0.7: Er ... your example doesn't actually seem to involve greatest() or least()? regards, tom lane
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: greatest/least semantics different between oracle and postgres
- From: paul rivers
- Re: greatest/least semantics different between oracle and postgres
- References:
- Re: greatest/least semantics different between oracle and postgres
- From: paul rivers
- Re: greatest/least semantics different between oracle and postgres
- Prev by Date: Re: greatest/least semantics different between oracle and postgres
- Next by Date: Re: greatest/least semantics different between oracle and postgres
- Previous by thread: Re: greatest/least semantics different between oracle and postgres
- Next by thread: Re: greatest/least semantics different between oracle and postgres
- Indexes: