Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: Numeric performances
- From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
- To: Vincenzo Romano <vincenzo(dot)romano(at)gmail(dot)com>
- Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: Numeric performances
- Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 13:42:20 -0400
Vincenzo Romano escribió: > Hi all. > I'd like to know whether there is any "real world" evaluation (aka test) on > performances of the NUMERIC data type when compared to FLOAT8 and FLOAT4. > The documentation simply says that the former is "much slower" than the latter > ones. It is. But why do you care? You either have the correctness that NUMERIC gives, or you don't. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
- References:
- Numeric performances
- From: Vincenzo Romano
- Numeric performances
- Prev by Date: Re: Design Table & Search Question
- Next by Date: Re: Design Table & Search Question
- Previous by thread: Numeric performances
- Next by thread: how to use array with "holes" ?
- Indexes: