Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: pgpool redundancy question
- From: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>
- To: kevin(at)kevinkempterllc(dot)com
- Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: pgpool redundancy question
- Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 10:22:34 +0900 (JST)
> Hi List; > > It seems that in a replication scenario pgpool becomes the single point of > failure, i.e. if we loose the pgpool box were dead. Any thoughts, > suggestions, best practices, etc per creating redundancy in the pgpool layer? > > I've posted to the pgpool list as well but I wanted to get some thoughts on > how the postgresql community has dealt with this... Try pgpool-HA. http://pgfoundry.org/projects/pgpool/ -- Tatsuo Ishii SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
- References:
- pgpool redundancy question
- From: Kevin Kempter
- pgpool redundancy question
- Prev by Date: Re: removing a restriction
- Next by Date: Re: removing a restriction
- Previous by thread: pgpool redundancy question
- Next by thread: DRDB risk factors?
- Indexes: