Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: index vs. seq scan choice?
- From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
- To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- Cc: George Pavlov <gpavlov(at)mynewplace(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: index vs. seq scan choice?
- Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 22:39:22 -0400
- Message-id: <20070525023922(dot)GV4320(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Tom Lane wrote: > (The default statistics target is 10, which is widely considered too > low --- you might find 100 more suitable.) Does this mean that we should look into raising the default a bit? -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: index vs. seq scan choice?
- From: Tom Lane
- Re: index vs. seq scan choice?
- References:
- index vs. seq scan choice?
- From: George Pavlov
- Re: index vs. seq scan choice?
- From: Tom Lane
- index vs. seq scan choice?
- Prev by Date: Cannot get autovacuum configured
- Next by Date: Re: index vs. seq scan choice?
- Previous by thread: Re: index vs. seq scan choice?
- Next by thread: Re: index vs. seq scan choice?
- Indexes: