Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: why postgresql over other RDBMS
- From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
- To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: why postgresql over other RDBMS
- Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 20:39:11 -0400
- Message-id: <20070525003911(dot)GF30806(at)phlogiston(dot)dyndns(dot)org>
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 03:25:52PM -0400, A.M. wrote: > Wouldn't it be a cool feature to persists transaction states > across connections so that a new connection could get access to a sub- > transaction state? You could do this using an incredibly evil, carefully implemented hack in a connection pool. I'm shuddering at the thought of it, to be honest, so details are left as an exervisse for the reader. A -- Andrew Sullivan | ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca A certain description of men are for getting out of debt, yet are against all taxes for raising money to pay it off. --Alexander Hamilton
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: why postgresql over other RDBMS
- From: A.M.
- Re: why postgresql over other RDBMS
- References:
- why postgresql over other RDBMS
- From: Jasbinder Singh Bali
- Re: why postgresql over other RDBMS
- From: Tom Allison
- Re: why postgresql over other RDBMS
- From: Richard Huxton
- Re: why postgresql over other RDBMS
- From: Alexander Staubo
- Re: why postgresql over other RDBMS
- From: Wiebe Cazemier
- Re: why postgresql over other RDBMS
- From: A.M.
- why postgresql over other RDBMS
- Prev by Date: Re: Delete with subquery deleting all records
- Next by Date: Inheritance question
- Previous by thread: Re: why postgresql over other RDBMS
- Next by thread: Re: why postgresql over other RDBMS
- Indexes: